Prophphylactic bilateral salpingngectomy: why is it worthwhile?

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed

Abstract

Malignant tumors of the ovary are characterized by late detection which is the chief factor responsible for their poor prognosis. Almost 70% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at clinical stage III or IV. At present, effective methods for early detection of ovarian cancer are lacking. One accepted approach to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer is bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. However, it is increasingly widely believed that even a more limited surgery of bilateral salpingectomy may be also used prophylactically as an effective means to reduce cancer risk. The procedure is based on extensive anatomopathological research on the origins of malignant cells in ovarian cancer. There is already ample scientific evidence that in a high proportion of cases the primary site of neoplastic transformation is the distal segment of the fallopian tube, from which malignant cells migrate to the ovary. However, long-term studies demonstrating the effectiveness of prophylactic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer are required. This article summarizes the benefits and disadvantages of the procedure based on currently available literature.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-08T06:14:57.058073+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC