Links between cognition and functioning: Examining the role of mental health in clinically ascertained and population-based samples

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The study examined how cognitive performance relates to functioning and whether common mental health symptoms account for this relationship, using two cohorts: an online population sample (HealthWise Wales, N=3,679) and a psychiatric cohort (NCMH, N=1,036). Participants completed a cognitive battery and the WHODAS disability measure, with additional functioning indicators including current employment/education and cohabitation with a partner, and analyses tested associations in linear and logistic regression while considering mood, education, and health/lifestyle factors. Higher cognitive performance was associated with fewer functional difficulties and greater likelihood of employment/education, and higher depression and anxiety symptoms were consistently linked to reduced functioning, attenuating but not eliminating the cognition–functioning association. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Cognitive function is a significant predictor of health and mortality in the population. Common mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, are associated with both cognitive impairments and increased functional impairment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between cognition, mental health and functioning across two cohorts. Methods Participants were recruited from an online population cohort, HealthWise Wales (N=3,679), and a psychiatric cohort, the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH, N=1,036), to complete a cognitive battery and the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). We assessed the associations between cognitive performance and the WHODAS, as well as two measures of life functioning: current employment and cohabitation with a partner. We examined the role of current mood, education and health/lifestyle factors using linear and logistic regression. Results Higher cognitive performance was associated with fewer functional difficulties on the WHODAS (HealthWise Wales: B=-0.12, 95%CI[-0.15,-0.09], P<0.001; NCMH: B=-0.1, 95%CI[-0.13,-0.08], P<0.001), being in employment or education (HealthWise Wales: OR=1.22, 95%CI[1.11,1.34], P<0.001; NCMH: OR=1.31, 95%CI[1.19,1.46], P<0.001) and living with a partner (HealthWise Wales only: OR=1.19, 95%CI[1.06,1.32], P=0.003). Higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms were consistently associated with reduced functioning across all analyses. The relationship between cognition and functioning remained significant but attenuated after accounting for these symptoms. Conclusions Cognitive function was associated with functioning in both samples. This association may be partially explained by current symptoms of depression and anxiety. Both cognitive function and common mental health problems may be potential intervention targets to alleviate daily difficulties.
Full text 4,715 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Cognitive function is a significant predictor of health and mortality in the population. Common mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, are associated with both cognitive impairments and increased functional impairment. This study aimed to examine the relationship between cognition, mental health and functioning across two cohorts.

Methods

Participants were recruited from an online population cohort, HealthWise Wales (N=3,679), and a psychiatric cohort, the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH, N=1,036), to complete a cognitive battery and the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). We assessed the associations between cognitive performance and the WHODAS, as well as two measures of life functioning: current employment and cohabitation with a partner. We examined the role of current mood, education and health/lifestyle factors using linear and logistic regression.

Results

Higher cognitive performance was associated with fewer functional difficulties on the WHODAS (HealthWise Wales: B=-0.12, 95%CI[-0.15,-0.09], P<0.001; NCMH: B=-0.1, 95%CI[-0.13,-0.08], P<0.001), being in employment or education (HealthWise Wales: OR=1.22, 95%CI[1.11,1.34], P<0.001; NCMH: OR=1.31, 95%CI[1.19,1.46], P<0.001) and living with a partner (HealthWise Wales only: OR=1.19, 95%CI[1.06,1.32], P=0.003). Higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms were consistently associated with reduced functioning across all analyses. The relationship between cognition and functioning remained significant but attenuated after accounting for these symptoms.

Conclusions

Cognitive function was associated with functioning in both samples. This association may be partially explained by current symptoms of depression and anxiety. Both cognitive function and common mental health problems may be potential intervention targets to alleviate daily difficulties. Competing Interest Statement JTRW has received funding from Takeda Pharmaceuticals for research unrelated to this study. JTRW and IRJ have received funding from Akrivia Health for research unrelated to this study. AJL, JTRW and IRJ designed and developed the cognitive assessment (CONCA) used in this study. Funding Statement This study was funded by the National Centre for Mental Health (NCMH), a collaboration between Cardiff, Swansea and Bangor Universities The development of the CONCA battery was supported by two MRC grants (MC PC 17212 and MC PC 17170) and the Wellcome Trust (214601/Z/18/Z) Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee of Cardiff University gave ethical approval for this work (reference 15/64). Wales Research Ethics Committee 2 gave ethical approval for the National Centre for Mental Health (reference 16/WA/0323). Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 gave ethical approval for HealthWise Wales (reference 15/WA/0076). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability CONCA data on NCMH participants are available online in the MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics Walters Group Data Repository at https://walters.psycm.cf.ac.uk. Authors are not able to share data from the NCMH or HealthWise Wales cohorts directly due to restrictions. Data on the wider NCMH sample are available through direct application to NCMH (see https://www.ncmh.info for contact details). The HealthWise Wales dataset is available through HealthWise Wales on reasonable request (https://www.healthwisewales.gov.wales/for-researchers/).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0