Diving dinosaurs? Caveats on the use of bone compactness and pFDA for inferring lifestyle
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This paper identifies methodological flaws in a study using bone compactness to infer the diving habits of spinosaurid dinosaurs, concluding that the evidence for avid diving is undermined.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Measures of bone compactness in amniote tetrapods of varying lifestyle were used to infer that two spinosaurid dinosaurs ( Spinosaurus aegyptiacus , Baryonyx walkeri ) were diving “subaqueous foragers,” whereas a third spinosaurid ( Suchomimus tenerensis ) and other sampled nonavian dinosaurs were non-diving terrestrial feeders entering water only as waders. We outline shortcomings in this analysis that involve bone compactness sampling and measurement, lifestyle categorization, the inclusion and exclusion of taxa in the dataset, and flawed statistical methods and inferences. These many shortcomings undermine the evidence used to conclude that two spinosaurid taxa were avid divers. Bone compactness indices remain a valuable tool for interpretation of lifestyle in extinct species when based on sound dataset composition, robust statistical analysis, and consilience with evidence from functional, biomechanical, or paleoenvironmental considerations.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00