Serological autoimmune profile of systemic lupus erythematosus in deep and non-deep endometriosis patients
Deep endometriosis patients showed significantly higher antinuclear antibody positivity and more arthralgia and asthenia compared to non-deep endometriosis patients and healthy controls.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The study evaluated the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) serological autoimmune antibody profile in four groups of premenopausal participants: deep endometriosis (DE, n=50), non-deep endometriosis with ovarian endometriomas (Non-DE, n=50), healthy controls without endometriosis (C, n=45), and SLE patients without endometriosis (SLE group, n=46). Using blood samples and the standard SLE antibody profile, the authors found that the DE group had a statistically significant higher proportion of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity (20%) compared with Non-DE (4%) and controls (2.2%); complement reductions were more frequent in both DE and Non-DE but were not statistically significant, and anti-dsDNA and anticoagulant lupus were more frequent in DE without reaching statistical significance. DE participants also reported more arthralgia and asthenia than Non-DE and controls. The paper therefore identifies increased ANA positivity and generalized pain symptoms in DE but does not establish statistically significant differences for several other SLE markers, limiting conclusions about a broader autoimmune shift. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it compares SLE autoantibody profiles between deep and non-deep endometriosis patients.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,297 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:34:07.146298+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine