Codon decoding by split-tRNA: revisiting the tRNA selection mechanism

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The paper studied how codon–anticodon decoding occurs in translation, focusing on whether tRNA’s structural strain and intramolecular cooperativity actively drive selection kinetics and GTP hydrolysis. Using engineered functional split-tRNAs with a dangling anticodon loop (replacing the anticodon loop), the authors showed that split-tRNA supports in vitro translation nearly as efficiently as intact synthetic tRNA, which challenges the idea that tRNA strain is required for triggering GTP hydrolysis upon codon recognition. They further found that codon–anticodon stability is likely influenced by the dipole moments of adjacent nucleobases, and kinetic modeling supported a conformational selection model in which correct codon–anticodon minihelices allosterically promote closure and stabilization of the decoding site. A key caveat is that these conclusions are drawn from in vitro split-tRNA experiments and the associated modeling rather than direct in vivo measurements. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract The translation machinery is required to process all codon triplets without exception while maintaining high speed and accuracy, despite orders-of-magnitude differences in cognate pairing stability. For stability-based selection to be efficient, the range of pairing stabilities must be narrowed by raising the lower bound and lowering the upper bound. The constrained structure and intramolecular cooperativity of tRNA complicate understanding of how it modulates codon–anticodon stability and whether it affects selection kinetics beyond codon recognition. To address these questions, we engineered functional split-tRNAs bearing a dangling anticodon in place of the anticodon loop. Our results demonstrate that split-tRNA supports in vitro translation nearly as efficiently as intact synthetic tRNA, challenging the notion that tRNA strain is essential for triggering GTP hydrolysis in response to codon recognition. Using split-tRNA architecture, we found that codon–anticodon stability is likely modulated by the dipole moments of adjacent nucleobases. Our kinetic modeling aligns with a conformational selection mechanism, where the decoding site fluctuates between open and closed states, and the correct codon–anticodon minihelix acts as an allosteric effector that permits its spontaneous closure and stabilizes the closed state. Overall, our data challenge the notion that tRNA is an active player in the selection process.
Full text 11,418 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Codon decoding by split-tRNA: revisiting the tRNA selection mechanism | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Codon decoding by split-tRNA: revisiting the tRNA selection mechanism Sergey Mureev, Kirill Alexandrov, Yue Wu, Zhen-ling Cui This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The translation machinery is required to process all codon triplets without exception while maintaining high speed and accuracy, despite orders-of-magnitude differences in cognate pairing stability. For stability-based selection to be efficient, the range of pairing stabilities must be narrowed by raising the lower bound and lowering the upper bound. The constrained structure and intramolecular cooperativity of tRNA complicate understanding of how it modulates codon–anticodon stability and whether it affects selection kinetics beyond codon recognition. To address these questions, we engineered functional split-tRNAs bearing a dangling anticodon in place of the anticodon loop. Our results demonstrate that split-tRNA supports in vitro translation nearly as efficiently as intact synthetic tRNA, challenging the notion that tRNA strain is essential for triggering GTP hydrolysis in response to codon recognition. Using split-tRNA architecture, we found that codon–anticodon stability is likely modulated by the dipole moments of adjacent nucleobases. Our kinetic modeling aligns with a conformational selection mechanism, where the decoding site fluctuates between open and closed states, and the correct codon–anticodon minihelix acts as an allosteric effector that permits its spontaneous closure and stabilizes the closed state. Overall, our data challenge the notion that tRNA is an active player in the selection process. Biological sciences/Biochemistry/RNA Biological sciences/Molecular biology/Translation Full Text Additional Declarations There is NO Competing Interest. Supplementary Files Supplementaryncbv8.pdf Supplementary notes, figures and tables Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6894815","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":479410174,"identity":"b1c18699-d7a4-4f41-a212-2ba44e49c273","order_by":0,"name":"Sergey Mureev","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Queensland University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sergey","middleName":"","lastName":"Mureev","suffix":""},{"id":479410175,"identity":"7074aff5-be58-47bb-812d-ad26e64a714c","order_by":1,"name":"Kirill Alexandrov","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-6511","institution":"Queensland University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kirill","middleName":"","lastName":"Alexandrov","suffix":""},{"id":479410176,"identity":"6ee34d4a-5d5f-454e-9380-87ebf41bb1b1","order_by":2,"name":"Yue Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yue","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""},{"id":479410177,"identity":"98f25601-d494-41ea-8682-8c1b8dcbd677","order_by":3,"name":"Zhen-ling Cui","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Queensland University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhen-ling","middleName":"","lastName":"Cui","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-14 15:40:08","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":86488497,"identity":"afa8df1f-5d40-4194-82bf-694e21c580bf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-11 08:38:52","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1151845,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Article File","description":"","filename":"ArticleContentncbv10.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6894815/v1_covered_40ae60bd-6dfe-4b2f-bf24-2c2b42d6a923.pdf"},{"id":86487529,"identity":"581d04f7-7017-47c3-9be6-8db3e82a6a1b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-11 08:30:50","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2336688,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary notes, figures and tables","description":"","filename":"Supplementaryncbv8.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6894815/v1/ce9858a8e283e061d2535a87.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is \u003cb\u003eNO\u003c/b\u003e Competing Interest.","formattedTitle":"Codon decoding by split-tRNA: revisiting the tRNA selection mechanism","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-portfolio","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Nature Portfolio","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":false,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"The translation machinery is required to process all codon triplets without exception while maintaining high speed and accuracy, despite orders-of-magnitude differences in cognate pairing stability. For stability-based selection to be efficient, the range of pairing stabilities must be narrowed by raising the lower bound and lowering the upper bound. The constrained structure and intramolecular cooperativity of tRNA complicate understanding of how it modulates codon–anticodon stability and whether it affects selection kinetics beyond codon recognition. To address these questions, we engineered functional split-tRNAs bearing a dangling anticodon in place of the anticodon loop. Our results demonstrate that split-tRNA supports in vitro translation nearly as efficiently as intact synthetic tRNA, challenging the notion that tRNA strain is essential for triggering GTP hydrolysis in response to codon recognition. Using split-tRNA architecture, we found that codon–anticodon stability is likely modulated by the dipole moments of adjacent nucleobases. Our kinetic modeling aligns with a conformational selection mechanism, where the decoding site fluctuates between open and closed states, and the correct codon–anticodon minihelix acts as an allosteric effector that permits its spontaneous closure and stabilizes the closed state. Overall, our data challenge the notion that tRNA is an active player in the selection process.","manuscriptTitle":"Codon decoding by split-tRNA: revisiting the tRNA selection mechanism","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-11 08:30:45","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6894815/v1","editorialEvents":[],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"nature-communications","isNatureJournal":true,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"NCOMMS","sideBox":"Learn more about [Nature Communications](http://www.nature.com/ncomms/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://mts-ncomms.nature.com/","title":"Nature Communications","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature Communications","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"8e6b2876-c821-4a65-b0d4-a45b6f3a0de0","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":50904135,"name":"Biological sciences/Biochemistry/RNA"},{"id":50904136,"name":"Biological sciences/Molecular biology/Translation"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-11T08:30:45+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-11 08:30:45","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6894815","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6894815","identity":"rs-6894815","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0