Musculoskeletal Insights and Team-based Solutions for Chronic Pelvic Pain

Other OA: closed CC0
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

This paper highlights the prevalence of musculoskeletal issues in chronic pelvic pain, advocating for comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary physical therapy while addressing barriers to wider implementation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-26 · read from full text ⓘ

This review highlights that musculoskeletal dysfunction is a prevalent but frequently overlooked contributor to chronic pelvic pain in women. It emphasizes the necessity of comprehensive assessments, including movement pattern analysis and pelvic floor examinations, alongside first-line treatments like physical therapy. The authors note that while multidisciplinary care optimizes outcomes, implementation is hindered by insurance gaps and limited specialist availability. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects up to 24% of women worldwide, with musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction present in most cases yet often overlooked in traditional organ-focused approaches. Comprehensive musculoskeletal assessment, including movement pattern analysis, pelvic floor examination, and evaluation of hip, spine, and abdominal wall pathology is essential for accurate diagnosis. First-line treatment with pelvic floor physical therapy demonstrates significant efficacy, though multidisciplinary team-based care optimizes outcomes through coordinated treatment plans. Despite evidence supporting this integrated approach, barriers including insurance coverage gaps, limited specialists, and insufficient musculoskeletal education prevent widespread implementation, necessitating advocacy, curriculum expansion, and systematic changes prioritizing comprehensive patient-centered care.
Full text 1,119 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Musculoskeletal Insights and Team-based Solutions for Chronic Pelvic Pain - Erin T. Carey* - Christine M. Chu† - Lauren D. Schiff* - Asha McClurg* - Noor Dasouki Abu-Alnadi* - Ingrid Harm-Ernandes† - Colleen M. Fitzgerald‡,§ Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects up to 24% of women worldwide, with musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction present in most cases yet often overlooked in traditional organ-focused approaches. Comprehensive musculoskeletal assessment, including movement pattern analysis, pelvic floor examination, and evaluation of hip, spine, and abdominal wall pathology is essential for accurate diagnosis. First-line treatment with pelvic floor physical therapy demonstrates significant efficacy, though multidisciplinary team-based care optimizes outcomes through coordinated treatment plans. Despite evidence supporting this integrated approach, barriers including insurance coverage gaps, limited specialists, and insufficient musculoskeletal education prevent widespread implementation, necessitating advocacy, curriculum expansion, and systematic changes prioritizing comprehensive patient-centered care.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (41)

SciLite annotations

organisms 1
noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-09-08T06:07:36.077809+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:55:40.749282+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-06-21T06:47:03.627287+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-04T06:24:41.714486+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK