Hierarchical and non-hierarchical network flows generate complementary representational dynamics in human visual cortex

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The study examined how hierarchical versus direct (non-hierarchical) region-to-region pathways contribute to visual cortical function, using high-resolution 7T MRI to measure direct resting-state functional connectivity and parameterize empirical neural network (ENN) models. Across the visual system, the authors recovered the classic V1-to-V4 hierarchy by combining network distance from V1 along the direct connectome with representational transformation distance in task-related representational dissimilarity. ENN lesion experiments then showed that hierarchical pathways (V1↔V2↔V3↔V4) reduced the dimensionality of neural representations, whereas direct pathways (e.g., V1↔V4) supported more rapid and higher-dimensional representational dynamics. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Hierarchy is considered a fundamental organizing principle of visual cortex, but its functional implications remain debated given the presence of direct (non-hierarchical) connections. Building on recent advances in measuring direct region-to-region functional connectivity in the human brain, and in using that connectivity (rather than, e.g., visual classification training) to construct deep neural network models, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchical and direct connectivity pathways make distinct contributions to the generation of visual functionality. Detailed measurement of visual functionality, connectivity, and their interaction was achieved using 7T MRI and empirical neural network (ENN) models parameterized by empirical connectivity estimates. The classic V1 to V4 hierarchy was recovered in terms of (i) network distance from V1 along the human brain’s direct region-to-region resting-state functional connectome and (ii) on-task representational transformation distance (visual representation dissimilarity) from V1. In silico ENN lesion experiments revealed that hierarchical pathways (V1↔V2↔V3↔V4) reduce the dimensionality of neural representations relative to more rapid and high-dimensional representational contributions from direct pathways (e.g., V1↔V4). These findings reveal distinct but complementary roles of hierarchical and direct pathways in generating cortical functionality. Significance Statement Hierarchy is a foundational organizing principle of cortex, yet its functional consequences remain unclear because of direct, non-hierarchical connections. The visual system, often portrayed as the clearest example of cortical hierarchy, provides a testbed for dissociating hierarchical and non-hierarchical contributions. Using high-resolution 7T MRI with recent advances in measuring direct region-to-region functional connectivity, we mapped the classic V1 to V4 hierarchy in the human brain. Using empirical neural network (ENN) models parameterized by these empirical connections, we determined that hierarchical pathways (V1↔V2↔V3↔V4) reduce representational dimensionality relative to more rapid, high-dimensional contributions from direct pathways (e.g., V1↔V4). These results reveal complementary hierarchical and direct contributions and establish ENN modeling as a general approach for determining pathway-specific functions throughout the brain.
Full text 2,483 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Hierarchy is considered a fundamental organizing principle of visual cortex, but its functional implications remain debated given the presence of direct (non-hierarchical) connections. Building on recent advances in measuring direct region-to-region functional connectivity in the human brain, and in using that connectivity (rather than, e.g., visual classification training) to construct deep neural network models, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchical and direct connectivity pathways make distinct contributions to the generation of visual functionality. Detailed measurement of visual functionality, connectivity, and their interaction was achieved using 7T MRI and empirical neural network (ENN) models parameterized by empirical connectivity estimates. The classic V1 to V4 hierarchy was recovered in terms of (i) network distance from V1 along the human brain’s direct region-to-region resting-state functional connectome and (ii) on-task representational transformation distance (visual representation dissimilarity) from V1. In silico ENN lesion experiments revealed that hierarchical pathways (V1↔V2↔V3↔V4) reduce the dimensionality of neural representations relative to more rapid and high-dimensional representational contributions from direct pathways (e.g., V1↔V4). These findings reveal distinct but complementary roles of hierarchical and direct pathways in generating cortical functionality. Significance Statement Hierarchy is a foundational organizing principle of cortex, yet its functional consequences remain unclear because of direct, non-hierarchical connections. The visual system, often portrayed as the clearest example of cortical hierarchy, provides a testbed for dissociating hierarchical and non-hierarchical contributions. Using high-resolution 7T MRI with recent advances in measuring direct region-to-region functional connectivity, we mapped the classic V1 to V4 hierarchy in the human brain. Using empirical neural network (ENN) models parameterized by these empirical connections, we determined that hierarchical pathways (V1↔V2↔V3↔V4) reduce representational dimensionality relative to more rapid, high-dimensional contributions from direct pathways (e.g., V1↔V4). These results reveal complementary hierarchical and direct contributions and establish ENN modeling as a general approach for determining pathway-specific functions throughout the brain. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0