Pooled results for Mirena versus second-generation endometrial destruction
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper examines how spare receptors modify the dose-response relationship and antagonism of receptor-mediated drug actions, as proposed by the receptor reserve phenomenon.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
According to the original receptor occupancy theory proposed by Clark in the 1930s, the percent occupancy of total available receptors by an agonist is linearly related to the response (or effect). However, the first recognition of "receptor reserve" or "spare receptors" mainly by Furchgott and Stephenson in separate studies about two decades ago has profoundly modified the original receptor occupancy theory, that is, the receptor occupancy is not directly proportional to the responses, and the ED50 (or EC50) could be much lower than the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd). To date, the receptor reserve phenomenon has been characterized in an increasing number of receptor systems. In theory, spare receptors may influence the profile of dose-response (D-R) relationship as well as that of the competitive or noncompetitive antagonism of receptor-mediated drug actions.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK