Niche-Based Priority Effects Predict Microbe Resistance toErwinia amylovorain Pear Nectar

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fire blight is a devastating disease affecting pome fruit trees that is caused by Erwinia amylovora and leads to substantial annual losses worldwide. While antibiotic-based management approaches like streptomycin can be effective, there are concerns over evolved resistance of the pathogen and non-target effects on beneficial microbes and insects. Using microbial biological control agents (mBCAs) to combat fire blight has promise, but variable performance necessitates the discovery of more effective solutions. Here we used a niche-based predictive framework to assess the strength of priority effects exerted by prospective mBCAs, and the mechanisms behind growth suppression in floral nectar. Through in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that antagonist impacts on nectar pH and sucrose concentration were the primary predictors of priority effects. Surprisingly, overlap in amino acid use, and the degree of phylogenetic relatedness between mBCA and Erwinia did not significantly predict pathogen suppression in vitro , suggesting that competition for limited shared resources played a lesser role than alterations in the chemical environment created by the initial colonizing species. We also failed to detect an association between our measures of in vitro and in vivo Erwinia suppression, suggesting other mechanisms may dictate mBCA establishment and efficacy in flowers, including priming of host defenses.
Full text 2,121 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
ABSTRACT Fire blight is a devastating disease affecting pome fruit trees that is caused by Erwinia amylovora and leads to substantial annual losses worldwide. While antibiotic-based management approaches like streptomycin can be effective, there are concerns over evolved resistance of the pathogen and non-target effects on beneficial microbes and insects. Using microbial biological control agents (mBCAs) to combat fire blight has promise, but variable performance necessitates the discovery of more effective solutions. Here we used a niche-based predictive framework to assess the strength of priority effects exerted by prospective mBCAs, and the mechanisms behind growth suppression in floral nectar. Through in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that antagonist impacts on nectar pH and sucrose concentration were the primary predictors of priority effects. Surprisingly, overlap in amino acid use, and the degree of phylogenetic relatedness between mBCA and Erwinia did not significantly predict pathogen suppression in vitro, suggesting that competition for limited shared resources played a lesser role than alterations in the chemical environment created by the initial colonizing species. We also failed to detect an association between our measures of in vitro and in vivo Erwinia suppression, suggesting other mechanisms may dictate mBCA establishment and efficacy in flowers, including priming of host defenses. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Funding: This work was supported by grants from the California Pear Advisory Board (RV), USDA (2017-67012-26104 and NE1501; RS and RV, respectively), University of California Davis (Start-up; RV), and Washington State University BIOAg Program (Proj. 168; RS and DC). AAF was supported through an NSF REU site award (DBI-1950299). RS also acknowledges support from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (Proj. 1466) and Utah State University. This manuscript has been approved as journal paper number 9680. e-Xtra: Supplementary material is available online. The author(s) declare no conflict of interest

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0