Abstract
Introduction Stereological estimates of villous membrane thickness and surface area are widely used to infer the diffusive exchange capacity of the human placenta. A key geometric determinant of exchange capacity can be expressed as an effective diffusive length scale. Here we combine virtual histological sections with computational modelling in realistic villous geometries to assess the accuracy of classical stereological estimates of this diffusive length scale.
Methods
Two terminal villi, reconstructed from three-dimensional imaging, were digitally sectioned to generate random two-dimensional geometries containing fetal capillaries and surrounding villous tissue. For each section, we simulated steady diffusive transport between the fetal-capillary and intervillous-space boundaries to obtain a physics-based diffusive length scale as a reference case. Using the same geometries, we applied standard line–intercept stereology to measure harmonic-mean barrier thickness and boundary–length densities, from which a stereological estimate of diffusive length scale was derived.
Results
Across both villi, stereology systematically overestimated the diffusive length scale by approximately 15−25%, depending on villus and section. We identified sources of this discrepancy, including interface curvature and assumptions underpinning the stereological correction factors, using idealised models of villous structure.
Conclusion
These findings highlight the need for stereological approaches that account for curvature when interpreting placental structure–function relationships.
Competing Interest Statement
This work was partly supported by the Wellcome Leap "In Utero" programme.
Footnotes
The manuscript has been updated to include changes requested by peer-reviewers for the journal Placenta. The current manuscript has been accepted for publication in that journal. The revised manuscript has a new figure 1 which is a schematic for the errors encountered in stererological approximation of diffusive capacity. The message of the paper has been refined to include a wider discussion of possible sources of error in stereological approximations. The text has been refined to help a wider readership follow our methods and message.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.