Dualsteric and dual-acting modulation of muscarinic receptors by antagonist KH-5

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background and purpose Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are key therapeutic targets, and ligands engaging both orthosteric and allosteric sites may offer improved selectivity and efficacy. The muscarinic antagonist KH-5 displays functional antagonistic potency exceeding its binding affinity, suggesting a non-classical mechanism of action. Here, we investigated whether KH-5 acts as a dualsteric antagonist and defined its mode of interaction with muscarinic receptors. Experimental approach Functional responses at human M 1 and M 2 receptors expressed in CHO cells were assessed using inositol phosphate accumulation and [ 35 S]GTPγS binding, respectively. Radioligand binding studies employed orthosteric antagonists and agonists in combination with KH-5 and classical allosteric modulators. Data were analysed using competitive, allosteric, and dualsteric binding and operational models. Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis were used to identify structural determinants of KH-5 binding. Key results KH-5 antagonised responses to multiple agonists in a saturable and probe-dependent manner consistent with an allosteric interaction. However, KH-5 did not decrease maximal response to agonists, contradicting simple allosteric antagonism. At M 2 receptors, antagonism was largely competitive. Binding studies revealed transient enhancement of agonist binding at M 1 receptors at nanomolar concentrations of KH-5, best described by a dualsteric binding model involving independent orthosteric and ectopic site interactions. KH-5 did not bind to the classical muscarinic allosteric site at the second extracellular loop but interacted with an extracellular vestibule site, supported by molecular modelling and mutation of key residues. Conclusions and implications At M 1 receptors, the most parsimonious model among those tested combines orthosteric competition with an ectopic/allosteric component. At M 2 receptors, KH-5 behaves predominantly as an orthosteric antagonist under the present conditions, although a weak or probe-specific allosteric component cannot be excluded. Summary What is already known Muscarinic receptors are therapeutic targets with conserved orthosteric binding sites. Allosteric or dualsteric ligands may improve receptor-subtype selectivity. What this study adds KH-5 shows dualsteric, dual-acting modulation at M 1 receptors. At M 2 receptors, KH-5 behaves mainly as a competitive antagonist. Clinical significance Dualsteric muscarinic antagonists may enable subtype-selective anticholinergic drug development. KH-5 provides a framework for designing mixed orthosteric/allosteric ligands.
Full text 2,773 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background and purpose Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are key therapeutic targets, and ligands engaging both orthosteric and allosteric sites may offer improved selectivity and efficacy. The muscarinic antagonist KH-5 displays functional antagonistic potency exceeding its binding affinity, suggesting a non-classical mechanism of action. Here, we investigated whether KH-5 acts as a dualsteric antagonist and defined its mode of interaction with muscarinic receptors. Experimental approach Functional responses at human M1 and M2 receptors expressed in CHO cells were assessed using inositol phosphate accumulation and [35S]GTPγS binding, respectively. Radioligand binding studies employed orthosteric antagonists and agonists in combination with KH-5 and classical allosteric modulators. Data were analysed using competitive, allosteric, and dualsteric binding and operational models. Molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and site-directed mutagenesis were used to identify structural determinants of KH-5 binding. Key results KH-5 antagonised responses to multiple agonists in a saturable and probe-dependent manner consistent with an allosteric interaction. However, KH-5 did not decrease maximal response to agonists, contradicting simple allosteric antagonism. At M2 receptors, antagonism was largely competitive. Binding studies revealed transient enhancement of agonist binding at M1 receptors at nanomolar concentrations of KH-5, best described by a dualsteric binding model involving independent orthosteric and ectopic site interactions. KH-5 did not bind to the classical muscarinic allosteric site at the second extracellular loop but interacted with an extracellular vestibule site, supported by molecular modelling and mutation of key residues.

Conclusions

and implications The simplest model explaining the KH-5 mechanism of action at muscarinic receptors combines two concurrent modes of interaction. From the allosteric site, it positively modulates functional responses to agonists. From the orthosteric site, it exerts competitive antagonism of functional responses. Additionally, molecules of KH-5 bound to allosteric and orthosteric sites exert positive cooperativity. Highlights KH-5 antagonises muscarinic receptors with a potency exceeding its orthosteric binding affinity Functional antagonism shows probe dependence, indicating an allosteric component Binding studies support independent interaction of KH-5 with orthosteric and ectopic sites KH-5 does not bind the classical muscarinic allosteric site Except for xanomeline, the operational model of dualsterically modulated agonism explains the complex pharmacology of KH-5 at M1 receptors Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0