Viability Of Machine-Learning Strategies To Solve Psychometric Problems

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Validating scales for clinical purposes is a common process in medicine and psychology. Using machine-learning and statistics, we revalidated the Fenigstein & Vanable Paranoia Scale and showed that these kinds of approaches could be used both to achieve construct validity and criterion validity and could thus add an additional layer of evidence to traditional validation approaches. However, there is still a lot of work needed in order to evaluate the whole range of applications, disadvantages, and potential limitations of these approaches when applied for psychometric purposes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0