h-Index Determination
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
The h-index is probably the more popular method of evaluation of the impact of academic research-ers, and several modifications, related indexes or criticisms have been proposed. Also, h-indexes should only be compared for researchers in a same research field, but it is frequently used for com-paring researchers in different fields, greatly in private situations. Here I show in a simple way that when considering the deep significance of individual citation weight, the h-index is self-inconsistent. The calculation procedure for the h-index does not consider the true weight of individual citations, nor the change in the number of published documents and citations per year with time. Thus, an im-portant way of evaluating academic researchers is greatly relying on a index with a inaccurate defini-tion. On the other hand, the relative value of the h-indexes of two researchers working in different science fields is proportional to the square root of the ratio of respective field sizes, and therefore they should not be directly compared.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0