A commentary on the 'sentence superiority effect': Almost certainly guessing, not parallel interactive activation
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
This brief commentary addresses the question of what reading researchers and psycholinguists should make of the 'sentence superiority effect' (SSE) first reported by Snell and Grainger (2017), and explored in additional papers by the same group (Massol & Grainger, 2021; Massol, Mirault, & Grainger, 2021; Wen, Snell, & Grainger, 2019). The main conclusion is that Snell and Grainger's results from a 2AFC version of their task, reported in a footnote, tell us that the SSE is most likely due to a simple guessing strategy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0