Endometriosis-associated infertility alters the microRNA signatures of cumulus cells with a particularly pronounced effect in oocytes that failed fertilization
Almiñana Brines, Carmen,
Sofia Makieva,
Stefan Bauersachs,
Saenz-de-Juano, Mara D,
Xie, Min,
Velasco, Ana,
Cervantes, Natalia,
Spalinger, Marianne R,
Ulbrich, Susanne E,
Brigitte Leeners
article
OA: green
CC0
⚙
AI-generated summary
by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-13
ⓘ
Endometriosis patients display altered microRNA signatures in cumulus cells, with distinct profiles observed between fertilized and unfertilized oocytes, suggesting compromised oocyte competence.
⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13
· read from full text
ⓘ
I can’t access the paper content because the provided text is blocked by an anti-scraping page (Anubis), so I’m unable to determine what the study analyzed, the methods used, the results reported, or any stated limitations. If you paste the abstract and/or the main results and limitations sections, I can produce a 3–5 sentence biomedical summary as requested. The paper is explicitly titled about endometriosis-associated infertility, so it would be directly relevant to endometriosis, but I cannot verify the specific findings without the actual text. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — microRNA signature changes in cumulus cells linked to endometriosis-associated infertility and failed fertilization.
Abstract
Endometriosis (E) is multifactorial disease affecting around 10% of women worldwide. The association between E and infertility is clinically well recognized. For E patients to achieve a successful pregnancy, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are considered as a treatment option. However, the impact of E on oocyte quality, its potential to be fertilized as well as pregnancy rates, is still under debate and with very few molecular clues explaining the clinical data. Alterations in protein-coding RNAs in cumulus cells (CCs), cells surrounding the oocytes and contributing to oocyte maturation, have been reported in E patients. But there is a lack of information regarding microRNAs (miRNAs), which control protein translation. Thus, we aimed: (1) to identify altered miRNA expression in CCs of E patients versus patients without the disease (control, C); and (2) to unveil if in E patients, CCs from fertilized oocytes display a different miRNA profile versus oocytes that failed fertilization. Small RNA-sequencing was performed on CCs from patients undergoing ART. A total of 85 differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs were identified in E versus C patients (FDR < 0.05). In E patients, 25 DE miRNAs were found between fertilized oocytes and oocytes that failed fertilization, while 13 DE miRNAs in C patients (FDR < 0.05). Comparisons among DE miRNAs highlighted three notable miRNA sets: Set (1) 35 DE miRNAs specific to E; Set (2) 27 DE miRNAs affected by both E and the potential to be fertilized; and Set (3) 6 DE miRNAs characteristic of a competent oocyte successfully fertilized despite the disease. Target gene analysis of DE miRNAs unveiled genes involved in oocyte meiosis, progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation pathway, embryo development, mitochondria and spindle alterations, calcium signaling, and oxidative stress. This study identified for the first time an altered miRNA signature in CCs of E patients, pointing towards compromised oocyte competence. Besides, in E patients, a characteristic CCs miRNA footprint for oocytes that can be successfully fertilized despite the disease has been revealed. The study charts new territory for non-invasive diagnosis and personalized treatments based on miRNAs to improve oocyte competence in E patients under ART treatments.
Full text
1,068 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot!
Loading...
You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone.
Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive.
Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate.
Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙
Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-html
ⓘ
Condition tags
endometriosisinfertility
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
This is a recent paper (2025) — citers
typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference
graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK