Cognitive Warfare as a Strategic Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Model of Censorship and Distrust

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Cognitive warfare is an area of increased scrutiny and concern worldwide. This paper argues that States that are increasingly employing censorship under the guise of combating "misinformation" may inadvertently replicate the cognitive warfare tactics they seek to defeat, to their own detriment. An iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma framework is proposed here to model such self-defeating strategies, where fear and anger drive societies toward distrust of their own government as well as an irrational acceptance of non-aligned information and propaganda. We formalize the role of the discount factor ( δ ) in determining whether states prioritize short-term control or long-term trust and analyze how censorship, in practice, fuels conspiracy theories, exemplified by the COVID-19 suppression of lab-leak hypotheses, later suggested by evidence. The model demonstrates that pluralistic discourse, not restrictive measures, is the dominant strategy for increasing δ and, ultimately, democratic resilience.
Full text 11,892 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Cognitive Warfare as a Strategic Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Model of Censorship and Distrust | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Cognitive Warfare as a Strategic Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Model of Censorship and Distrust Roberto Dillon, K. Thirumaran This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Cognitive warfare is an area of increased scrutiny and concern worldwide. This paper argues that States that are increasingly employing censorship under the guise of combating "misinformation" may inadvertently replicate the cognitive warfare tactics they seek to defeat, to their own detriment. An iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma framework is proposed here to model such self-defeating strategies, where fear and anger drive societies toward distrust of their own government as well as an irrational acceptance of non-aligned information and propaganda. We formalize the role of the discount factor ( δ ) in determining whether states prioritize short-term control or long-term trust and analyze how censorship, in practice, fuels conspiracy theories, exemplified by the COVID-19 suppression of lab-leak hypotheses, later suggested by evidence. The model demonstrates that pluralistic discourse, not restrictive measures, is the dominant strategy for increasing δ and, ultimately, democratic resilience. Social science/Politics and international relations Biological sciences/Psychology Social science/Psychology Prisoner’s Dilemma Covid-19 Cognitive Warfare Censorship Cooperation Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7874553","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":559922883,"identity":"7b4356cb-8b2f-424c-a642-40fa3b98da93","order_by":0,"name":"Roberto Dillon","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"James Cook University Singapore","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Roberto","middleName":"","lastName":"Dillon","suffix":""},{"id":559922884,"identity":"778f2cbb-5389-40a6-b371-d0d514e196d0","order_by":1,"name":"K. Thirumaran","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"James Cook University Singapore","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"K.","middleName":"","lastName":"Thirumaran","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-16 07:23:20","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":98623045,"identity":"7e4cf4da-8542-4361-887b-c791f4046429","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:04:16","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":49917,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CognitiveWarfareasaStrategicDilemmaanonymized.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1/13bc88d4d618fc16c5d5fe7d.docx"},{"id":98467165,"identity":"235114ba-be50-4a9e-98d0-36693b91d289","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-17 23:45:25","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3648,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ff53e2bbc34c4c829b3994ebf3fb1661.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1/a887fcbbc7383beac3859659.json"},{"id":98623618,"identity":"fbb5efb8-20a7-4fa4-a17a-25340e26d9c1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-19 17:07:04","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":69173,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ff53e2bbc34c4c829b3994ebf3fb16611enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1/62786143e7b75b7119d8937b.xml"},{"id":98467162,"identity":"810f8b93-8c47-4f13-b965-bbb953b10efd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-17 23:45:25","extension":"xml","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":68059,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ff53e2bbc34c4c829b3994ebf3fb16611structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1/42f13c6dfcccacd5948d5fe6.xml"},{"id":98467167,"identity":"999ad72b-c187-4ff2-bd22-ddc005f011e8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-17 23:45:25","extension":"html","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":78302,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1/703470f0437c20bc66445f1c.html"},{"id":101743103,"identity":"ce3edc21-bfc9-4e42-8662-f5c85dfb00db","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-03 08:42:45","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":350460,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"CognitiveWarfareasaStrategicDilemmaanonymized.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7874553/v1_covered_4d65c5ea-3190-428c-9dcb-c397fafd3459.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Cognitive Warfare as a Strategic Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Model of Censorship and Distrust","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Prisoner’s Dilemma, Covid-19, Cognitive Warfare, Censorship, Cooperation","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eCognitive warfare is an area of increased scrutiny and concern worldwide. This paper argues that States that are increasingly employing censorship under the guise of combating \"misinformation\" may inadvertently replicate the cognitive warfare tactics they seek to defeat, to their own detriment. An iterated Prisoner\u0026rsquo;s Dilemma framework is proposed here to model such self-defeating strategies, where fear and anger drive societies toward distrust of their own government as well as an irrational acceptance of non-aligned information and propaganda. We formalize the role of the discount factor (\u003cem\u003eδ\u003c/em\u003e) in determining whether states prioritize short-term control or long-term trust and analyze how censorship, in practice, fuels conspiracy theories, exemplified by the COVID-19 suppression of lab-leak hypotheses, later suggested by evidence. The model demonstrates that pluralistic discourse, not restrictive measures, is the dominant strategy for increasing \u003cem\u003eδ\u003c/em\u003e and, ultimately, democratic resilience.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Cognitive Warfare as a Strategic Dilemma: A Game-Theoretic Model of Censorship and Distrust","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-17 23:45:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7874553/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7df0f747-48ff-47f6-9403-e76cceee2940","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 17th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":59610247,"name":"Social science/Politics and international relations"},{"id":59610248,"name":"Biological sciences/Psychology"},{"id":59610249,"name":"Social science/Psychology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-03T08:41:52+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-17 23:45:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7874553","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7874553","identity":"rs-7874553","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0