DNA polymerase beta expression in head & neck cancer modulates the poly(ADP-ribose)-mediated replication checkpoint

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) imposes a significant health burden, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies to enhance treatment efficacy. Current treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have limited effectiveness and yield severe side effects, emphasizing the need for targeted therapies. We have focused on DNA polymerase beta (Polβ) and its roles in replication stress, cellular responses to DNA damaging therapies, and DNA damage response modifiers. Our investigations reveal a regulatory role for base excision repair (BER) proteins, including Polβ, in the cellular response to inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), an enzyme involved in poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) degradation. The inhibition of PARG, in HNSCC cells, elicits replication stress. Further, this activates the PAR-induced S-phase/ATR checkpoint, leading to a block to replication, cell cycle arrest, and the onset of apoptosis. However, Polβ overexpression mitigates this response, reducing replication-stress induced PAR foci formation, suggesting a modulation of replication checkpoint activation. We found that PARG inhibitor treatment is ineffective on HNSCC cells that overexpress Polβ, implying that the PARG inhibitor-induced PAR and apoptotic response is dependent on the level of Polβ. Further, our in vitro experiments demonstrate that combining PARG and ATR/CHK1 inhibitors overcomes Polβ-mediated treatment resistance in HNSCC cells, producing enhanced effects as compared to the individual treatment conditions. Our findings suggest a possible treatment paradigm for HNSCC, employing ATR or CHK1 inhibitors in combination with PARG inhibitors. This strategy offers a promising path for more effective HNSCC treatments, potentially overcoming Polβ-related resistance.
Full text 1,886 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) imposes a significant health burden, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies to enhance treatment efficacy. Current treatments such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have limited effectiveness and yield severe side effects, emphasizing the need for targeted therapies. We have focused on DNA polymerase beta (Polβ) and its roles in replication stress, cellular responses to DNA damaging therapies, and DNA damage response modifiers. Our investigations reveal a regulatory role for base excision repair (BER) proteins, including Polβ, in the cellular response to inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), an enzyme involved in poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) degradation. The inhibition of PARG, in HNSCC cells, elicits replication stress. Further, this activates the PAR-induced S-phase/ATR checkpoint, leading to a block to replication, cell cycle arrest, and the onset of apoptosis. However, Polβ overexpression mitigates this response, reducing replication-stress induced PAR foci formation, suggesting a modulation of replication checkpoint activation. We found that PARG inhibitor treatment is ineffective on HNSCC cells that overexpress Polβ, implying that the PARG inhibitor-induced PAR and apoptotic response is dependent on the level of Polβ. Further, our in vitro experiments demonstrate that combining PARG and ATR/CHK1 inhibitors overcomes Polβ-mediated treatment resistance in HNSCC cells, producing enhanced effects as compared to the individual treatment conditions. Our findings suggest a possible treatment paradigm for HNSCC, employing ATR or CHK1 inhibitors in combination with PARG inhibitors. This strategy offers a promising path for more effective HNSCC treatments, potentially overcoming Polβ-related resistance. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00