Beyond accuracy: A Kernel-level Comparative Analysis of Quantum and Classical Support Vector Machines

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This preprint studies kernel-level representational behavior of classical support vector machines with radial basis function kernels versus quantum support vector classifiers using ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap fidelity kernels, evaluated on two synthetic and two real-world 2D datasets. Using centred kernel alignment, Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion, eigenvalue spectrum analysis, spectral entropy, and effective rank, the authors find that shallow quantum kernels show moderate, fairly stable alignment with RBF (CKA ~0.41→0.57), while deeper circuits with two repetitions largely reduce both alignment and accuracy (e.g., Iris cross-validation accuracy 0.920→0.670, p=0.0004). They also report that depolarising noise increases quantum-classical kernel alignment, and note that the conditions producing the largest apparent quantum-classical divergence are exactly those often used to benchmark quantum kernel advantage. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Quantum kernel approaches have been touted as a possible way to gain representational advantages over classical machine learning techniques however most comparative work only looks at classification accuracy leaving the geometric structure of the kernels unexplored. We carry out a comprehensive kernel-level comparison between classical support vector machines (SVMs) with radial basis function (RBF) kernels and quantum support vector classifiers that use ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap fidelity kernels, tested on two synthetic and two real-world two-dimensional datasets. After applying centred kernel alignment(CKA), the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), eigenvalue spectrum analysis, spectral entropy, and effective rank. Firstly, shallow quantum kernels form a moderately aligned band with RBF across all datasets and conditions that is quite stable (CKA : 0.41 → 0.57), whereas going deeper in the circuit to two repetitions largely mismatches both alignment and accuracy with no representational gain (e.g. Iris cross-validation accuracy: 0.920 → 0.670, p = 0.0004). Secondly, depolarising noise surprisingly increases the quantum-classical kernel alignment, which means that near-term hardware kernels are structurally closer to RBF than noiseless simulations suggest. Thirdly, the scenarios that lead to maximum apparent quantum-classical divergence, small sample sizes and low noise, are precisely those most used to benchmark quantum kernel advantage. Kernel-level structural analysis is essential for meaningful evaluation of quantum machine learning methods.
Full text 11,582 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Beyond accuracy: A Kernel-level Comparative Analysis of Quantum and Classical Support Vector Machines | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Beyond accuracy: A Kernel-level Comparative Analysis of Quantum and Classical Support Vector Machines Shahryar Rza This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 7 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Quantum kernel approaches have been touted as a possible way to gain representational advantages over classical machine learning techniques however most comparative work only looks at classification accuracy leaving the geometric structure of the kernels unexplored. We carry out a comprehensive kernel-level comparison between classical support vector machines (SVMs) with radial basis function (RBF) kernels and quantum support vector classifiers that use ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap fidelity kernels, tested on two synthetic and two real-world two-dimensional datasets. After applying centred kernel alignment(CKA), the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), eigenvalue spectrum analysis, spectral entropy, and effective rank. Firstly, shallow quantum kernels form a moderately aligned band with RBF across all datasets and conditions that is quite stable (CKA : 0.41 → 0.57), whereas going deeper in the circuit to two repetitions largely mismatches both alignment and accuracy with no representational gain (e.g. Iris cross-validation accuracy: 0.920 → 0.670, p = 0.0004). Secondly, depolarising noise surprisingly increases the quantum-classical kernel alignment, which means that near-term hardware kernels are structurally closer to RBF than noiseless simulations suggest. Thirdly, the scenarios that lead to maximum apparent quantum-classical divergence, small sample sizes and low noise, are precisely those most used to benchmark quantum kernel advantage. Kernel-level structural analysis is essential for meaningful evaluation of quantum machine learning methods. Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing Physical sciences/Physics Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviews received at journal 12 Apr, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Apr, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 01 Apr, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 25 Mar, 2026 Editor invited by journal 24 Mar, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 18 Mar, 2026 First submitted to journal 18 Mar, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9057443","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":612065653,"identity":"7952c9ad-fa6e-492d-b494-0dc65ae274b9","order_by":0,"name":"Shahryar Rza","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Hyderabad","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shahryar","middleName":"","lastName":"Rza","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-07 09:56:41","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":105527945,"identity":"220f847a-b3e6-4926-acfa-cb9871786794","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-27 04:55:20","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2337741,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Revision1BeyondAccuracyAKernelLevelComparativeAnalysisofQuantumandClassicalSupportVectorMachines.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9057443/v1_covered_f740f499-7596-4a4d-999b-735a0782d580.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Beyond accuracy: A Kernel-level Comparative Analysis of Quantum and Classical Support Vector Machines","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Quantum kernel approaches have been touted as a possible way to gain representational advantages over classical machine learning techniques however most comparative work only looks at classification accuracy leaving the geometric structure of the kernels unexplored. We carry out a comprehensive kernel-level comparison between classical support vector machines (SVMs) with radial basis function (RBF) kernels and quantum support vector classifiers that use ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap fidelity kernels, tested on two synthetic and two real-world two-dimensional datasets. After applying centred kernel alignment(CKA), the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), eigenvalue spectrum analysis, spectral entropy, and effective rank. Firstly, shallow quantum kernels form a moderately aligned band with RBF across all datasets and conditions that is quite stable (CKA : 0.41 → 0.57), whereas going deeper in the circuit to two repetitions largely mismatches both alignment and accuracy with no representational gain (e.g. Iris cross-validation accuracy: 0.920 → 0.670, p = 0.0004). Secondly, depolarising noise surprisingly increases the quantum-classical kernel alignment, which means that near-term hardware kernels are structurally closer to RBF than noiseless simulations suggest. Thirdly, the scenarios that lead to maximum apparent quantum-classical divergence, small sample sizes and low noise, are precisely those most used to benchmark quantum kernel advantage. Kernel-level structural analysis is essential for meaningful evaluation of quantum machine learning methods.","manuscriptTitle":"Beyond accuracy: A Kernel-level Comparative Analysis of Quantum and Classical Support Vector Machines","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-27 04:53:43","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057443/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-04-12T09:19:25+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"210057382850223598651298072546294741988","date":"2026-04-03T07:04:22+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-01T05:33:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-03-25T13:46:08+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-03-24T07:08:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-03-18T06:51:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2026-03-18T05:44:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7c17736e-9ec8-4d6f-88ba-5c59bb3e5435","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 27th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":65124587,"name":"Physical sciences/Mathematics and computing"},{"id":65124588,"name":"Physical sciences/Physics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-01T05:40:03+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-27 04:53:43","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9057443","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9057443","identity":"rs-9057443","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0