Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for large benign adnexal tumors: one surgeon's experience over one-year period.

OA: closed
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text

This study evaluated the feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for removing large benign adnexal tumors by comparing operative efficiency against conventional laparoscopy. Ten patients underwent LESS procedures using a modified open Hasson technique and a single-port device inserted trans-umbilically, with specimens suctioned and removed via LapBag. The results indicated that specimen removal time was significantly shorter in the LESS group, averaging three to ten minutes compared to ten to seventeen minutes for conventional methods. This paper is centrally about benign adnexal tumor management; it does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis, but such conditions are common indications for the surgical interventions described.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo present the authors' experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) surgery for large benign adnexal tumors and to compare the removal time of resected specimen with that of conventional laparoscopy.Study designTen consecutive patients underwent LESS for huge adnexal tumors at Myongjil Hospital, Korea between March 2011 and July 2012. A modified open Hasson technique was used to gain access to the abdominal cavity. The single-port device was inserted trans-umbilically into the wound opening. After suction of large amount of fluid content, LESS salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The resected adnexal specimen was placed into a LapBag for removal out of the abdominal cavity. The authors compared the removal time of resected specimen between LESS and previously performed conventional laparoscopy for large benign adnexal tumors.ResultsThe adnexal tumors in this study were all very large cystic tumors reaching near or over the umbilicus. It took less than ten minutes for the removal of the resected adnexal tumors in all LESS cases (three to ten minutes), much less time than that of the conventional laparoscopy (usually ten to 17 minutes).ConclusionLESS for large benign adnexal tumors is feasible and removal of resected adnexal tumor is easier than conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Full text 2,075 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective: To present the authors’ experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) surgery for large benign adnexal tumors and to compare the removal time of resected specimen with that of conventional laparoscopy. Study Design: Ten consecutive patients underwent LESS for huge adnexal tumors at Myongjil Hospital, Korea between March 2011 and July 2012. A modified open Hasson technique was used to gain access to the abdominal cavity. The single-port device was inserted trans-umbilically into the wound opening. After suction of large amount of fluid content, LESS salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The resected adnexal specimen was placed into a LapBag for removal out of the abdominal cavity. The authors compared the removal time of resected specimen between LESS and previously performed conventional laparoscopy for large benign adnexal tumors. Results: The adnexal tumors in this study were all very large cystic tumors reaching near or over the umbilicus. It took less than ten minutes for the removal of the resected adnexal tumors in all LESS cases (three to ten minutes), much less time than that of the conventional laparoscopy (usually ten to 17 minutes). Conclusion: LESS for large benign adnexal tumors is feasible and removal of resected adnexal tumor is easier than conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords

- LESS - Large benign adnexal tumor - Removal time

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-23T09:30:01.253652+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-28T06:28:33.284919+00:00