Fertility after conservative treatment of endometriosis.

Kable WT 3rd, Warren T. Kable, W T Kable, Marvin A. Yussman, M A Yussman, Yussman MA
The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1985 · vol. 30(11) , pp. 857–63 · PMID:2934549 · W2411863302
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 10 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-28 ⓘ

This study reviewed 128 infertile patients with endometriosis, finding that 52% of those who declined therapy conceived spontaneously and 48% of those with poor postcoital tests conceived after treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The charts of 128 infertile patients with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis for the seven years ending in June 1980 were reviewed. The patients were staged according to the American Fertility Society classification. All couples underwent semen analysis, endometrial biopsy, postcoital testing and hysterosalpingography. Life-table analysis was used to evaluate the different treatment modalities. An unexpected finding was that 9 of 17 patients (52%) who declined therapy after laparoscopy conceived, for a monthly fecundity of 0.03. The most common associated infertility factor was a poor postcoital test (in 23%). Fourteen of the 29 patients with a poor postcoital test (48%) conceived after treatment of their endometriosis, for a monthly fecundity of 0.02.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Infertility, Female Uterine Neoplasms Adult Danazol Danazol Endometriosis Ethinyl Estradiol Ethinyl Estradiol Ethinyl Estradiol-Norgestrel Combination Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Norgestrel Norgestrel Pregnancy Prognosis Uterine Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:40.384591+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK