Abstract
The in vitro transformation of plants, or the delivery of foreign genetic material that is incorporated into their genomes, represents a powerful tool both for elucidating genotype-phenotype relationships and for generating plant cultivars which have desirable traits for agriculture and/or biotechnological applications. However, outside of a few model species, the processes involved in transformation are often inefficient and can take months to perform for many plant species, with several bottlenecks occurring at the different stages of calli induction, genetic transfection, and plant regeneration. While duckweeds – aquatic monocots whose species include some of the smallest and fastest-growing flowering plants on the planet – have distinguished themselves with several emerging biotechnological applications, they too are the subject of conflicting reports regarding their transformation potential and ability to be genetically manipulated. Here, we synthesized and optimized the protocols for in vitro transformation of duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza (Greater Duckweed) from start-to-finish: achieving >90% - 100% efficiencies for each of calli induction; transient and stable genetic transformation; visual marker-free selection of transformants; and regeneration of genetically modified plants with stable transgene expression for over 100 generations – and which in S. polyrhiza can be achieved over the course of weeks instead of months. The integrated, streamlined approaches for all stages of in vitro transformation overcome many bottlenecks and can help to pave the way for high-throughput functional genomics studies and synthetic biology applications in this biotechnologically-important species.
Full text
2,189 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
The in vitro transformation of plants, or the delivery of foreign genetic material that is incorporated into their genomes, represents a powerful tool both for elucidating genotype-phenotype relationships and for generating plant cultivars which have desirable traits for agriculture and/or biotechnological applications. However, outside of a few model species, the processes involved in transformation are often inefficient and can take months to perform for many plant species, with several bottlenecks occurring at the different stages of calli induction, genetic transfection, and plant regeneration. While duckweeds – aquatic monocots whose species include some of the smallest and fastest-growing flowering plants on the planet – have distinguished themselves with several emerging biotechnological applications, they too are the subject of conflicting reports regarding their transformation potential and ability to be genetically manipulated. Here, we synthesized and optimized the protocols for in vitro transformation of duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza (Greater Duckweed) from start-to-finish: achieving >90% - 100% efficiencies for each of calli induction; transient and stable genetic transformation; visual marker-free selection of transformants; and regeneration of genetically modified plants with stable transgene expression for over 100 generations – and which in S. polyrhiza can be achieved over the course of weeks instead of months. The integrated, streamlined approaches for all stages of in vitro transformation overcome many bottlenecks and can help to pave the way for high-throughput functional genomics studies and synthetic biology applications in this biotechnologically-important species.
Competing Interest Statement
Authors have no interests to declare. Corteva Agriscience provided Agrobacterium strain LBA4404-Thy-with helper plasmid and the binary vector PHP81858.
Abbreviations
- MS
- Murashige and Skoog
- SH
- Schenk and Hildebrandt
- 2,4-D
- 2,4 Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
- TDZ
- Thidiazuron
- 6-BA
- 6-Benzylaminopurine
- ABA
- Abscisic acid
- NAA
- 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid
- AS
- Acetosyringone
- MES
- 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.