Robotic and AI Enabled Waste Segregation A Systematic Review of Methods Benchmarks and Challenges

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 10,399 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Robotic and AI Enabled Waste Segregation A Systematic Review of Methods Benchmarks and Challenges | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Robotic and AI Enabled Waste Segregation A Systematic Review of Methods Benchmarks and Challenges Manish Saini, Rashmi Chawla, Amit Kulshreshtha This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Robotic and AI-based waste sorting has advanced rapidly over the last decade, yet deployment beyond laboratory settings remains limited. This survey systematically synthesizes 192 peer-reviewed studies (2010--2025) spanning (i) machine and deep learning perception, (ii) hybrid systems integrating optimization, fuzzy logic, and IoT fusion, (iii) robotic implementations, and (iv) process-oriented approaches. Using a PRISMA-guided protocol, we detail the search strategy, screening criteria, and quality assessment, and compare methods across accuracy (Accuracy/F1, mAP), efficiency (latency, throughput, energy), and deployment readiness Technology Readiness Level(TRL), safety. The analysis reveals strong performance on small, curated datasets (e.g., YOLO-family detectors and EfficientNet classifiers), but generalization degrades under clutter, occlusion, and dataset shift; benchmarks remain small and inconsistent, and reporting often omits system-level metrics. We propose a unified taxonomy, a minimal reporting checklist, and a multimodal benchmarking agenda (RGB-D, weight, RFID) to enhance reproducibility and comparability. Finally, we outline future research directions in explainable perception, adaptive grasping, and privacy-preserving or federated learning for municipal-scale deployments. Waste sorting Robotic manipulation Object detection Sensor fusion Edge AI Federated learning Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8474173","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":603884161,"identity":"881957eb-9d4d-4593-9bf6-b2abfc83e9b1","order_by":0,"name":"Manish Saini","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Delhi","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Manish","middleName":"","lastName":"Saini","suffix":""},{"id":603884162,"identity":"5fb6947b-1dc0-4395-bd20-557ecd3c2032","order_by":1,"name":"Rashmi Chawla","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"J.C. Bose University of Science \u0026 Technology, YMCA","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rashmi","middleName":"","lastName":"Chawla","suffix":""},{"id":603884163,"identity":"c8d7025f-c261-4db7-b5b5-1e4de3b5e701","order_by":2,"name":"Amit Kulshreshtha","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"NTPC Consultancy (India)","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Amit","middleName":"","lastName":"Kulshreshtha","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-29 15:08:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":105361831,"identity":"90aa90a9-27d8-4cad-af9d-e4ccd04b3591","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-25 07:58:26","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":567860,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"RobotWasteManagementv066.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8474173/v1_covered_dadca378-39d5-49dd-8105-7ea36905dc0c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eRobotic and AI Enabled Waste Segregation A Systematic Review of Methods Benchmarks and Challenges\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Waste sorting, Robotic manipulation, Object detection, Sensor fusion, Edge AI, Federated learning","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Robotic and AI-based waste sorting has advanced rapidly over the last decade, yet deployment beyond laboratory settings remains limited. This survey systematically synthesizes 192 peer-reviewed studies (2010--2025) spanning (i) machine and deep learning perception, (ii) hybrid systems integrating optimization, fuzzy logic, and IoT fusion, (iii) robotic implementations, and (iv) process-oriented approaches. Using a PRISMA-guided protocol, we detail the search strategy, screening criteria, and quality assessment, and compare methods across accuracy (Accuracy/F1, mAP), efficiency (latency, throughput, energy), and deployment readiness Technology Readiness Level(TRL), safety. The analysis reveals strong performance on small, curated datasets (e.g., YOLO-family detectors and EfficientNet classifiers), but generalization degrades under clutter, occlusion, and dataset shift; benchmarks remain small and inconsistent, and reporting often omits system-level metrics. We propose a unified taxonomy, a minimal reporting checklist, and a multimodal benchmarking agenda (RGB-D, weight, RFID) to enhance reproducibility and comparability. Finally, we outline future research directions in explainable perception, adaptive grasping, and privacy-preserving or federated learning for municipal-scale deployments.","manuscriptTitle":"Robotic and AI Enabled Waste Segregation A Systematic Review of Methods Benchmarks and Challenges","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-13 08:04:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8474173/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"f5a18bbe-9029-460e-a803-040bbe147ce5","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 13th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-25T07:57:20+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-13 08:04:03","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8474173","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8474173","identity":"rs-8474173","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0