Satellite observations reveal positive relationship between trait-based diversity and drought response in temperate forests

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships are increasingly recognized as an important aspect of ecosystem research and management thanks to knowledge gained from long-term grassland and, more recently, forest experiments. However, to what extent the behavior of non-experimental systems corresponds to the relationships discovered in BEF experiments remains controversial. We investigated the relationship between trait-based diversity and drought response using data from forests in northern Switzerland, which experienced an extremely hot and dry summer in 2018. We used Sentinel-2 satellite data to assess trait diversity and quantified drought response in terms of resistance, recovery, and resilience from 2017 to 2020. We then analyzed the BEF relationship between trait-based diversity and drought response for different aggregation levels of richness and evenness. Forests with greater richness were more resistant and resilient to the drought event, and the relationship of evenness with resistance or resilience was hump-shaped or negative, respectively. These results suggest that trait-based diversity supported forest drought response via a mixture of complementarity and dominance effects, the first indicated by positive richness effects and the second by negative evenness effects. Our results link ecosystem functioning and biodiversity at large scales and provide new insights into the BEF relationships in real-world forest ecosystems.
Full text 2,712 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Climate extremes such as droughts are expected to increase in frequency and intensity with global change. Therefore, it is important to map and predict ecosystem responses to such extreme events to maintain ecosystem functions and services. Alongside abiotic factors, biotic factors such as the proportion of needle and broadleaf trees were found to affect forest drought responses, corroborating results from biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) experiments. Yet it remains unclear to what extent the behavior of non-experimental systems at large scales corresponds to the relationships discovered in BEF experiments. Using remote sensing, the trait-based functional diversity of forest ecosystems can be directly quantified. We investigated the relationship between remotely sensed functional richness and evenness and forest drought responses using data from temperate mixed forests in Switzerland, which experienced an extremely hot and dry summer in 2018. We used Sentinel-2 satellite data to assess aspects of functional diversity and quantified drought response in terms of resistance, recovery, and resilience from 2017 to 2020 in a scalable approach. We then analyzed the BEF relationship between functional diversity measures and drought response for different aggregation levels of richness and evenness of three physiological canopy traits (chlorophyll, carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio, and equivalent water thickness). Forest stands with greater trait richness were more resistant and resilient to the drought event, and the relationship of trait evenness with resistance or resilience was hump-shaped or negative, respectively. These results suggest forest functional diversity can support forests in such drought responses via a mixture of complementarity and dominance effects, the first indicated by positive richness effects and the second by negative evenness effects. Our results link ecosystem functioning and biodiversity at large scales and provide new insights into the BEF relationships in non-experimental forest ecosystems. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X24619 Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF), functional diversity, plant traits, Remote Sensing, conservation, ecological monitoring, forest drought response, functional diversity, plant traits, remote sensing, conservation, ecological monitoring, forest drought response Dates Published: 2024-01-30 13:22 Last Updated: 2025-02-21 06:23 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0