Comparative analysis of RAN translation from CAG repeats within the Huntingtin coding sequence

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Repeat associated non-AUG (RAN) translation is a non-canonical initiation event that occurs in the absence of a start codon in repeat expansion disorders, generating aggregation-prone proteins which may contribute to pathogenicity. The mechanism by which repeats trigger RAN translation is not completely understood, with most prior work focused on how repeats might elicit initiation when placed within a 5’ leader in reporter plasmids. However, RAN translation is also reported to generate out-of-frame proteins in Huntington disease (HD), where a CAG repeat expansion in exon 1 of the Huntingtin gene ( HTT) resides within the coding sequence of the gene. To explore this process, we generated a series of RAN translation-specific reporter constructs that include the 5’ leader and first exon of HTT and compared their translation to CGG and GGGGCC repeats. CAG repeats support RAN translation in both the alanine (GCA) and glutamine (CAG) frames in both the presence and absence of upstream start codons or near-AUG cognate codons. HTT RAN translation in the alanine frame is comparable in efficiency to polyalanine RAN translation from CGG repeats and exhibits cap-dependence and selective enhancement by activation of the integrated stress response. Importantly, this translation was readily detectable from in vitro transcribed RNAs transfected into neurons or cellular lysates, suggesting that plasmid based aberrant splicing into CAG repeats does not explain the observed phenomena. CAG repeats in the context of HTT exon 1 elicit neuronal toxicity in the absence of any AUG initiation codons. Taken together, these data suggest that RAN translation shares key mechanistic parameters across different repeat sequences and surrounding RNA contexts with implications for therapy development.
Full text 1,884 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Repeat associated non-AUG (RAN) translation is a non-canonical initiation event that occurs in the absence of a start codon in repeat expansion disorders, generating aggregation-prone proteins which may contribute to pathogenicity. The mechanism by which repeats trigger RAN translation is not completely understood, with most prior work focused on how repeats might elicit initiation when placed within a 5’ leader in reporter plasmids. However, RAN translation is also reported to generate out-of-frame proteins in Huntington disease (HD), where a CAG repeat expansion in exon 1 of the Huntingtin gene (HTT) resides within the coding sequence of the gene. To explore this process, we generated a series of RAN translation-specific reporter constructs that include the 5’ leader and first exon of HTT and compared their translation to CGG and GGGGCC repeats. CAG repeats support RAN translation in both the alanine (GCA) and glutamine (CAG) frames in both the presence and absence of upstream start codons or near-AUG cognate codons. HTT RAN translation in the alanine frame is comparable in efficiency to polyalanine RAN translation from CGG repeats and exhibits cap-dependence and selective enhancement by activation of the integrated stress response. Importantly, this translation was readily detectable from in vitro transcribed RNAs transfected into neurons or cellular lysates, suggesting that plasmid based aberrant splicing into CAG repeats does not explain the observed phenomena. CAG repeats in the context of HTT exon 1 elicit neuronal toxicity in the absence of any AUG initiation codons. Taken together, these data suggest that RAN translation shares key mechanistic parameters across different repeat sequences and surrounding RNA contexts with implications for therapy development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0