Coherence and Uniqueness in Risk Capital Allocation: Linking Exposure Curves, Expected Shortfall, and Aumann–Shapley Values

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

This paper develops a unified framework for risk capital allocation, centered on Ex-pected Shortfall (ES). We establish the structural equivalence between Complementary Risk Exposure (CRE) and ES, showing that CRE is not an independent risk measure but a distributional representation of ES. Under continuous differentiability, ES ensures analytical uniqueness: capital allocation is uniquely determined via Euler decomposi-tion and strictly coincides with the Aumann–Shapley allocation. Incorporating Denault’s (2001) axioms further secures axiomatic uniqueness, demonstrating that ES-based allocation is stable both mathematically and institutionally. For non-smooth or atomic distributions, Rockafellar–Uryasev optimization and subgradient methods are applied, with portfolio-based CRE proposed as a canonical selection, preserving uniqueness in practice. The paper’s contribution is twofold: it is the first to integrate coherent risk measures with the dual uniqueness of capital allocation (analytical and axiomatic) within a sin-gle framework, and it positions the CRE–ES equivalence as the key nexus. This result provides both mathematical rigor and practical applicability, offering a robust foun-dation for theory, regulation, and practice in risk capital allocation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-26T02:00:01.498150+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0