Incidence of menstrual symptoms suggestive of possible endometriosis in adolescents: and variance in these by ethnicity and socio-economic status
This study analyzed GP records for over 2.8 million adolescent females, finding a 3.48% incidence of coded dysmenorrhea and 0.07% of endometriosis, with symptom coding varying by ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study used the QResearch English primary care database to estimate the incidence of endometriosis and dysmenorrhoea-related symptoms in adolescent females aged 10–19 years from 2011 to mid-2021, reporting descriptive statistics and examining variation by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Among 2,843,347 adolescents, 98,887 (3.48%) had coded dysmenorrhoea and 1,994 (0.07%) had documented endometriosis, with cumulative incidence by age 10–19 for those turning 10 in 2011 of 7.2% for dysmenorrhoea and 0.12% for endometriosis. Period prevalence of codes potentially associated with endometriosis included heavy menstrual bleeding (3.73%), irregular bleeding (2.21%), pelvic pain (0.63%), dyspareunia (0.40%), PMS/PMDD (0.22%), and IBS (1.00%), and the authors observed disparities in coding across demographics and differences in prescribed hormonal medication by ethnicity. The paper’s main caveat is that GP-record prevalence/incidence (especially dysmenorrhoea) is significantly lower than community survey estimates, suggesting under-coding or differences in documentation, and therefore may not fully reflect true symptom burden. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it documents incidence of endometriosis and symptom codes suggestive of possible endometriosis in adolescents using GP records.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,536 characters
· extracted from
oa-pdf
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Background
Method
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-28T06:11:45.309088+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine