Mitonuclear divergence predicts gradual speciation in animal hybrid zones

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0

Abstract

The core of speciation is the genetic incompatibilities underlying the evolution of reproductive isolation. Hybrid zones provide unique opportunities to unravel the evolutionary rate of reproductive isolation in the origin of species. The selection against hybrids accrues with increased genetic incompatibilities and drives the evolution of reproductive isolation in the face of gene flow. There have been decades of debates over the relationship between the selection against hybrids and the genetic divergence between parental lineages. The debates occur primarily among three models: (1) the Additive Effect Model predicts a linear growth of selection against hybrids with the divergence of parental lineages; (2) the Snowball Effect Model predicts exponential growth of selection; whereas (3) the Slowdown Effect Model predicts a logarithmic growth of selection. Here, we tested the three models with animal hybrid zones worldwide. The Slowdown Effect Model (3) is best supported with the full dataset. We refined the three models to consider independent and interactive effects of mitochondrial (mtDNA) and nuclear genetic (nDNA) divergence on the selection against hybrids. The refined Snowball Model (2) was best supported by the data, revealing a significant effect of nuclear genetic distance and its interaction with mtDNA distance on the selection against hybrid DNA in the hybrid zones. Collectively, this data synthesis in the early stage of animal speciation reveals a gradual development of reproductive isolation with mitonuclear genetic divergence.
Full text 2,296 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. The core of speciation is the genetic incompatibilities underlying the evolution of reproductive isolation. Hybrid zones provide unique opportunities to unravel the evolutionary rate of reproductive isolation in the origin of species. The selection against hybrids accrues with increased genetic incompatibilities and drives the evolution of reproductive isolation in the face of gene flow. There have been decades of debates over the relationship between the selection against hybrids and the genetic divergence between parental lineages. The debates occur primarily among three models: (1) the Additive Effect Model predicts a linear growth of selection against hybrids with the divergence of parental lineages; (2) the Snowball Effect Model predicts exponential growth of selection; whereas (3) the Slowdown Effect Model predicts a logarithmic growth of selection. Here, we tested the three models with animal hybrid zones worldwide. The Slowdown Effect Model (3) is best supported with the full dataset. We refined the three models to consider independent and interactive effects of mitochondrial (mtDNA) and nuclear genetic (nDNA) divergence on the selection against hybrids. The refined Snowball Model (2) was best supported by the data, revealing a significant effect of nuclear genetic distance and its interaction with mtDNA distance on the selection against hybrid DNA in the hybrid zones. Collectively, this data synthesis in the early stage of animal speciation reveals a gradual development of reproductive isolation with mitonuclear genetic divergence. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z357 Life Sciences, Medicine and Health Sciences Speciation rate, Hybrid zone, Snowball Effect, Genetic incompatibility, speciation, hybridization, Cline Published: 2025-08-11 08:39 Last Updated: 2025-08-11 08:39 CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0