Abstract
Artificial intelligence is being touted more and more as something that will supplant human labor, something that inspires some but terrifies most. Giant tech giants are driving this, presenting automation as something inevitable and even desirable. But one would still like to know: can one really dispense with human effort in maintaining the tempo of civilization? This essay contends that while AI can boost productivity and reshape markets, substituting fully for human labor is not feasible or desirable on ethical bases. The analysis is a mix of three arguments. At the labor economies level, the analysis looks at how automation destroys forms of employment, especially in informal and gig economies where dignity and stability are already weak. At the market level, it asks if AI creates truly new demand or only redistributes value, raising questions about the possibility of limitless growth by means of automatization. At the moral level, it considers dignity, autonomy, and value of service, knowing that work is not merely a way of making a living but also a path of meaning and continuity. The implications are that human labor is more than a production factor but the foundation of civilization. Care, ritual, and creativity are key to advancement in ways that are not replicable by machines. To turn a blind eye to facts is to risk hollowing out economies and societies. The paper ends by advocating for a balanced way where AI arrives as a tool that supplements and does not substitute human work.
Full text
6,447 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
AI and the Irreplaceability of Human Effort: An Inquiry into Labor Economies and Ethics | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 29 September 2025 V1 Latest version Share on AI and the Irreplaceability of Human Effort: An Inquiry into Labor Economies and Ethics Author : PARTHA ROY 0009-0002-1893-3637 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175915665.53415049/v1 193 views 111 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Artificial intelligence is being touted more and more as something that will supplant human labor, something that inspires some but terrifies most. Giant tech giants are driving this, presenting automation as something inevitable and even desirable. But one would still like to know: can one really dispense with human effort in maintaining the tempo of civilization? This essay contends that while AI can boost productivity and reshape markets, substituting fully for human labor is not feasible or desirable on ethical bases. The analysis is a mix of three arguments. At the labor economies level, the analysis looks at how automation destroys forms of employment, especially in informal and gig economies where dignity and stability are already weak. At the market level, it asks if AI creates truly new demand or only redistributes value, raising questions about the possibility of limitless growth by means of automatization. At the moral level, it considers dignity, autonomy, and value of service, knowing that work is not merely a way of making a living but also a path of meaning and continuity. The implications are that human labor is more than a production factor but the foundation of civilization. Care, ritual, and creativity are key to advancement in ways that are not replicable by machines. To turn a blind eye to facts is to risk hollowing out economies and societies. The paper ends by advocating for a balanced way where AI arrives as a tool that supplements and does not substitute human work. Supplementary Material File (ai_and_human_effort_labor_ethics.pdf) Download 848.17 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 29 September 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Keywords artificial intellgence human labor labor economics Authors Affiliations PARTHA ROY 0009-0002-1893-3637 [email protected] View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 193 views 111 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation PARTHA ROY. AI and the Irreplaceability of Human Effort: An Inquiry into Labor Economies and Ethics. Authorea . 29 September 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175915665.53415049/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.175915665.53415049/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fea3f4fef6409d6',t:'MTc3OTI2ODYzNg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.