Accurate Variant Classification in Tumour-Only Genomic Data Using Interpretable Tabular Models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Recent work has shown that machine learning can provide a reliable tool to classify somatic and rare germline variants in cancer studies where matched-normal samples are not available. Here, we present a workflow that combines an opensource pipeline with three machine-learning models, XGBoost, LightGBM, and TabNet, trained on eight types of features. Our approach substantially enhances the accuracy across all tested models providing accurate results irrespective of sample ancestry and tumour type. We build a parsimonious model and demonstrate that training on low-coverage data retains high accuracy when applied to high-coverage data and vice versa. In contrast to previous findings, our results indicate that XGBoost slightly outperforms LightGBM, achieving high classification accuracy even in the absence of copy-number information and allowing for the ancestry-unbiased calculation of the tumour mutational burden for different types of cancer.
Full text 1,042 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Recent work has shown that machine learning can provide a reliable tool to classify somatic and rare germline variants in cancer studies where matched-normal samples are not available. Here, we present a workflow that combines an opensource pipeline with three machine-learning models, XGBoost, LightGBM, and TabNet, trained on eight types of features. Our approach substantially enhances the accuracy across all tested models providing accurate results irrespective of sample ancestry and tumour type. We build a parsimonious model and demonstrate that training on low-coverage data retains high accuracy when applied to high-coverage data and vice versa. In contrast to previous findings, our results indicate that XGBoost slightly outperforms LightGBM, achieving high classification accuracy even in the absence of copy-number information and allowing for the ancestry-unbiased calculation of the tumour mutational burden for different types of cancer. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0