Detecting authorities that manipulate public procurement
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Abstract Manipulative authorities can bunch tenders just below thresholds to implement noncompetitive procurement practices in public procurement. Here, I use regression discontinuity manipulation tests to identify this bunching manipulation scheme. I investigate the European Union public procurement data set that covers more than two million contracts. The results show that 10-13% of the examined authorities have high probabilities of bunching manipulation. I study the impact of manipulation by authorities on public procurement. I find that manipulative authorities are less likely to employ competitive procurement procedures. Local firms are more likely to win contracts from a manipulative authority. The bunching scheme increases the probability that the same firm wins contracts repeatedly. Empirical results suggest that policy makers can effectively employ regression discontinuity tests to determine manipulative authorities.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0