Independence of Visuomotor Functions Engaged in Visual Pursuit and Rapid Responses to Reach Errors

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0

Abstract

ABSTRACT When reaching to a foveated target, peripheral vision of the hand can be used to make rapid, automatic adjustments to the ongoing reach movement, with the feedback gain being sensitive to features of the task and environment. These rapid corrective responses are also observed when gaze is directed to a stationary ‘gaze’ target located away from the reach target. In everyday contexts, reaching often occurs concurrently with other visual or visuomotor tasks, such as tracking a moving target. Yet it remains unclear whether engaging in such tasks affects the use of peripheral vision for hand guidance. Here, we compare rapid visuomotor corrective responses to visual perturbations during fixation and smooth pursuit, and test whether pursuit-related and reach-related visuomotor processes operate independently or compete for shared visual resources. Participants either fixated a stationary target or tracked a moving target while reaching toward a spatially dissociated reach target. During the reach, the visual representation of the hand was perturbed, requiring rapid corrective responses. We found that neither the onset nor the gain of reach corrections was modulated by gaze-task demands. Moreover, response gains were strongly correlated across tasks, indicating consistent individual response profiles that were independent of the gaze condition. Despite modest increases in position error and decreases in gain, participants largely sustained engagement with the visual tasks during target reaching. These findings demonstrate that smooth pursuit and reach-related visuomotor processing can operate in parallel without mutual interference, suggesting a functional independence between them. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In everyday life, reaching to an object can occur while the eyes are engaged in competing visual tasks. We show that engaging in smooth pursuit eye movements does not disrupt rapid visuomotor corrections during reaching. The onset and gain of corrective responses following perturbation were unchanged by gaze-task demands and were consistent across individuals. These findings demonstrate that pursuit and reach-related visuomotor processes can operate in parallel, supporting functional independence between these systems.
Full text 2,333 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
ABSTRACT When reaching to a foveated target, peripheral vision of the hand can be used to make rapid, automatic adjustments to the ongoing reach movement, with the feedback gain being sensitive to features of the task and environment. These rapid corrective responses are also observed when gaze is directed to a stationary ‘gaze’ target located away from the reach target. In everyday contexts, reaching often occurs concurrently with other visual or visuomotor tasks, such as tracking a moving target. Yet it remains unclear whether engaging in such tasks affects the use of peripheral vision for hand guidance. Here, we compare rapid visuomotor corrective responses to visual perturbations during fixation and smooth pursuit, and test whether pursuit-related and reach-related visuomotor processes operate independently or compete for shared visual resources. Participants either fixated a stationary target or tracked a moving target while reaching toward a spatially dissociated reach target. During the reach, the visual representation of the hand was perturbed, requiring rapid corrective responses. We found that neither the onset nor the gain of reach corrections was modulated by gaze-task demands. Moreover, response gains were strongly correlated across tasks, indicating consistent individual response profiles that were independent of the gaze condition. Despite modest increases in position error and decreases in gain, participants largely sustained engagement with the visual tasks during target reaching. These findings demonstrate that smooth pursuit and reach-related visuomotor processing can operate in parallel without mutual interference, suggesting a functional independence between them. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In everyday life, reaching to an object can occur while the eyes are engaged in competing visual tasks. We show that engaging in smooth pursuit eye movements does not disrupt rapid visuomotor corrections during reaching. The onset and gain of corrective responses following perturbation were unchanged by gaze-task demands and were consistent across individuals. These findings demonstrate that pursuit and reach-related visuomotor processes can operate in parallel, supporting functional independence between these systems. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0