The Effects of Rewards on Trial-and-Error Learning in School-Aged Children

preprint OA: closed
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study used computerized games to show that negative rewards improve trial-and-error learning in school-aged children, leading to higher success rates and more efficient strategies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Humans’ ability to rapidly identify appropriate actions in new situations is critical for functional behavior. This skill develops through trial-and-error where humans learn to choose the optimal actions through rewards from previous acts. Here, we used computerised games to test developmental changes in how rewards affect trial-and-error learning. School-aged children (5- to 15-year-olds) played online games while receiving either positive rewards, negative rewards, or no rewards. We tested how the groups differed in performance and play strategy. Children who received negative rewards had higher success rates, fewer attempts, and more efficient strategies. They also showed significant improvement with age, similar to the controls but in contrast to children who received positive rewards. Our findings demonstrate a developmental shift in how rewards affect trial-and-error and suggest that negative rewards emerge as a powerful cognitive reinforcer during late childhood.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00