Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background Silicosis is a lethal occupational disease caused by long-term exposure to respirable silica dust. Pulmonary macrophages play a crucial role in mediating the initiation of silicosis. However, the phenotypic and functional heterogeneities of pulmonary macrophages in silicosis have not been well-studied. Methods The silicosis mouse model was established by intratracheal administration of silica suspension. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) of mice were collected for the multiplex cytokine analysis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics were performed to reveal the heterogeneity and spatial localization of macrophages in the lung tissues. The formation of the fibrotic nodules was characterized by histology, hydroxyproline assay, and immunohistochemical staining, respectively. The expression of the pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic genes was investigated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Results We found that the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines is significantly increased in the BALFs of silicosis mice. Apparent collagen deposition can also be observed in the silicotic lung tissues. By scRNA-seq, we have identified a subpopulation of Mmp12 hi macrophages significantly expanding in the lung tissues of mice with silicosis. Spatial transcriptomics analysis further confirmed that the Mmp12 hi macrophages are mainly enriched in silicosis nodules. Pseudotime trajectory showed that these Mmp12 hi macrophages, highly expressing both pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic genes are derived from Ly6c + monocytes. Additionally, 4-octyl itaconate (4-OI) treatment, which can alleviate pulmonary fibrosis in silicosis mice, also reduces the enrichment of the Mmp12 hi macrophages. Moreover, we found a subset of macrophages in BALFs derived from patients with silicosis exhibited similar characteristics of Mmp12 hi macrophages in silicosis mice models. Conclusions Our study suggested that a group of Mmp12 hi macrophages highly express both pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic factors in silicosis mice, and thus may contribute to the progression of fibrosis. The findings have proposed new insights for understanding the heterogeneity of lung macrophages in silicosis, suggesting that the subset of Mmp12 hi macrophages may be a potential therapy target to further halt the progression of silicosis.
Full text 73,718 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis Hanyujie Kang , Xueqing Gu , Siyu Cao , Zhaohui Tong , Nan Song doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.580775 Hanyujie Kang 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Xueqing Gu 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Siyu Cao 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zhaohui Tong 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: tongzhaohuicy{at}sina.com nsong{at}ccmu.edu.cn Nan Song 1 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 2 Medical Research Center, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China , 100020 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: tongzhaohuicy{at}sina.com nsong{at}ccmu.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF Abstract Background Silicosis is a lethal occupational disease caused by long-term exposure to respirable silica dust. Pulmonary macrophages play a crucial role in mediating the initiation of silicosis. However, the phenotypic and functional heterogeneities of pulmonary macrophages in silicosis have not been well-studied. Methods The silicosis mouse model was established by intratracheal administration of silica suspension. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) of mice were collected for the multiplex cytokine analysis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics were performed to reveal the heterogeneity and spatial localization of macrophages in the lung tissues. The formation of the fibrotic nodules was characterized by histology, hydroxyproline assay, and immunohistochemical staining, respectively. The expression of the pro-inflammatory or pro-fibrotic genes was investigated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Results We found that the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines is significantly increased in the BALFs of silicosis mice. Apparent collagen deposition can also be observed in the silicotic lung tissues. By scRNA-seq, we have identified a subpopulation of Mmp12 hi macrophages significantly expanding in the lung tissues of mice with silicosis. Spatial transcriptomics analysis further confirmed that the Mmp12 hi macrophages are mainly enriched in silicosis nodules. Pseudotime trajectory showed that these Mmp12 hi macrophages, highly expressing both pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic genes are derived from Ly6c + monocytes. Additionally, 4-octyl itaconate (4-OI) treatment, which can alleviate pulmonary fibrosis in silicosis mice, also reduces the enrichment of the Mmp12 hi macrophages. Moreover, we found a subset of macrophages in BALFs derived from patients with silicosis exhibited similar characteristics of Mmp12 hi macrophages in silicosis mice models. Conclusions Our study suggested that a group of Mmp12 hi macrophages highly express both pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic factors in silicosis mice, and thus may contribute to the progression of fibrosis. The findings have proposed new insights for understanding the heterogeneity of lung macrophages in silicosis, suggesting that the subset of Mmp12 hi macrophages may be a potential therapy target to further halt the progression of silicosis. 1. Introduction Silicosis, an occupational disease with relatively high morbidity and mortality, is caused by long-term exposure to silica particles, characterized by the formation of silicotic nodules and progressive pulmonary fibrosis 1 . Recently, the incidence of silicosis gradually increases due to the development of emerging industries, such as artificial stone countertop cutting, jewelry polishing, etc. 2 . However, there is still no effective therapy for treating silicosis. Generally, lung transplantation is still the only treatment option for terminal silicosis. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the pathogenesis of silicosis to further find effective intervention targets. Unlike idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), caused by recurrent alveolar epithelial cell injury, silicosis has its unique development process 3 . Alveolar macrophages, which phagocytose silica dust, play a crucial role in the occurrence and development of silicosis 2 . Current studies indicated that an excessive inflammation triggered by silica-engulfed macrophage is the initiating factor in fibrosis 2 . Because these phagocytes cannot eliminate silica particles from the pulmonary tissue, the inflammatory damage persistently exists, followed by excessive injury repair, finally leading to the formation of silicosis nodules 3 . Thus, exploring the functions of pulmonary macrophages can help us better understand the progression of silicosis. Conventional research on macrophage function in silicosis mainly focused on the M1/M2 polarization 4 . However, recent studies have revealed the dichotomous approach is not inadequate to present the complexity of macrophages 5 . Regarding pulmonary macrophages, these cells can be classified as alveolar macrophages (AMs) or interstitial macrophages (IMs), depending on their localization in the alveolar spaces or the lung parenchyma 6 . According to the origin, lung macrophages can be divided into resident macrophages and monocyte-derived macrophages 6 . Our group previously also explored the heterogeneity of macrophages in Pneumocystis -infected mice, and found a population of monocyte-derived macrophages may contribute to the clearance of infected pathogens 7 . With the development of new technologies such as single-cell-based spatial transcriptomics, the heterogeneity and spatial localization of macrophages in silicosis can be better resolved, and several subsets of macrophages have been identified as pro-fibrotic cell populations. For example, Ramachandran et al. revealed the function of TREM2 + macrophages in triggering fibrosis in injured liver tissue 8 . Morse et al. revealed that SPP1 hi macrophages contribute to lung fibrosis by activating myofibroblasts 9 . However, it is not yet known whether some specific macrophage populations are also involved in the silicosis microenvironment. In the present study, we employed scRNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics, and multiplex cytokine analysis to discover the critical subset of pulmonary macrophages. We explored the potential contributions of disease-related macrophages in the progression of silicosis, and provided new insights into designing therapeutic therapies for silicosis by targeting specific macrophage subsets. 2. Methods 2.1. Mouse models Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from the Vital River Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free facilities. The silicosis mouse model was constructed by silica suspension administration as previously reported 10 . Briefly, each mouse was intratracheally instilled 12 mg silica (Sigma, S5631) suspended in 40 uL sterile PBS, while control mice received the same volume of sterile PBS. These mice were sacrificed in 42 days after silica exposure. The Capital Medical University Animal Care and Use Committee approved this study. 2.2. In vivo treatment To establish the 4-octyl itaconate (4-OI) therapeutic model, we randomly divided mice into three groups: PBS control group, silicosis model group, and 4-OI intervention group. The method of establishing the silica-induced lung fibrosis model is the same as above. The 4-OI intervention group was administered 4-OI (50 mg/kg) (MedChemExpress, HY-112675) dissolved in sterile corn oil (MedChemExpress, HY-Y1888) by intraperitoneal injection once other days after intratracheal instillation of silica. The silicosis model group was given an equal amount of corn oil simultaneously. They were euthanized on day 42 after PBS or silica instillation. 2.3. Hydroxyproline assay The contents of hydroxyproline (HYP) in the lung tissues of mice exposed to silica were measured by the Hydroxyproline Assay Kit (A030-2-1, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The lobe of the left lung was harvested from each mouse for detection. The absorbance of the sample was measured at 550 nm; the HYP concentration was described in the ug/left lobe. 2.4. Lung tissue histology First, we fixed the mouse lung with 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by dehydrated and paraffin-embedded. Then, lung tissue sections with a thickness of 4 um were taken and incubated at 60 ℃ for 4 hours, and subsequent Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Masson staining were performed. 2.5. Immunohistochemistry For immunohistochemistry, lung tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and blocked endogenous peroxidase activity. The slides underwent antigen retrieval with citrate buffer pH 6.0 or tris-EDTA buffer pH 9.0. The goat serum was used in sections for blocking, followed by incubation with primary antibodies (anti-type I collagen, ABclonal; anti-Cd68, Proteintech; anti-Ly6g, ABclonal). After incubation of the secondary antibody Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (HRP) (Abcam), DAB staining and hematoxylin counterstain were done before microscopic observation. 2.6. Determination of cytokines levels in BALFs Mice were sacrificed after being anesthetized with pentobarbital. Lungs underwent lavage with sterile PBS to obtain bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected for the cytokines and chemokines levels measurement by ProcartaPlex Multiplex Immunoassay (ThermoFisher) based on the Luminex platform according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 2.7. Quantitative real-time PCR Total RNAs were extracted from the homogenized lung tissue via TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA by PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (RR047A, Takara). The qPCR was performed with LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche). Then, the gene expression was calculated via the 2 −ΔΔCT method after normalization to β-actin. Related primers’ sequences are available on request. 2.8. Tissue collection for scRNA-seq and spatial sequencing For scRNA-seq, mice were sacrificed under anesthetization and lung tissues were collected. The lung tissues were cut into fine pieces and digested at 37°C for 30 min with shaking using the Lung Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech) in combination with the gentleMACS Dissociators (Miltenyi Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The lung homogenate was filtered with 70 µm cell strainers. Then, cell suspensions were centrifuged at 400 g for 6 min, and the red blood cells were removed by RBC lysing buffer. Finally, cells were centrifuged, cell counted, and viability determined. For spatial transcriptomics, mice were euthanized and fresh lungs were harvested. The lung tissues were embedded in OCT on dry ice as quickly as possible. 2.9. Downloading scRNA-Seq data of human BALF Single-cell RNA-Seq data of human BALF from two exposure miners and three patients with silicosis were downloaded from the GEO database (GSE174725). 2.10. ScRNA-seq and data analysis The 10×Genomics Single Cell 3’ Library & Gel Bead Kit v3 (10×Genomics) and 10×Genomics Chromium Controller (10×Genomics) were used to generate single-cell libraries. Agilent 4200 was used to assess the quality of libraries. Then, the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The Cell Ranger (v.4.0.0) was applied to produce raw gene expression matrices (mouse GRCm38/mm10 using as reference genome). Further analysis, including quality control and cell clustering, was performed in R software (v.4.2.2) using the Seurat 11 package (v.4.1.1). For mouse scRNA-seq data if the cells were detected with less than 400 genes, more than 6,000 genes or 25000 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), and more than 10% mitochondrial genes, then the cells were excluded from the final analysis. As for scRNA-seq data from human BALF, cells with less than 200 genes (all samples), more than 6,000 genes, or more than 10% mitochondrial genes were removed d from the final analysis. Subsequently, the NormalizeData function was used to normalize gene expression levels, and the top 2,000 variable genes were calculated by the FindVariableFeatures function. To reduce the dimensions, the scaled data was used to perform principal component analysis and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) projections. Clusters were annotated according to the expressions of known canonical markers genes. Differentially expressed genes and pathway enrichment Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by the FindMarkers function. Genes expressed in > 25% of cells and with the logFC > 0.25 were selected as differentially expressed genes. The pathway enrichment analyses were implemented by the clusterProfiler R package and visualized with the ggplot2 R package. Gene Ontology gene sets were used to perform biological process (BP) analysis. In order to compare the group 2 macrophages in human data and Mmp12 hi macrophages in mouse data, we produced the signatures of the two groups of macrophages based on the scRNA-seq data. The transcriptomic comparison was then performed by GSEA. 2.11. Scores according to inflammation and fibrosis-related gene sets Inflammation and fibrosis-related Gene set scoring were performed using Seurat’s AddModuleScore function. The Hallmark Inflammatory Response gene set and the WP Lung Fibrosis gene set were both downloaded from the Molecular Signatures Database ( http://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp ). 2.12. Trajectory analysis, receptor-ligand analysis, and SCENIC analysis To infer the cell lineage developmental trajectories of macrophages and monocytes, trajectory analysis was conducted by the Monocle2 12 R package. We used CellChat 13 to model the receptor-ligand interaction network between cells. The pySCENIC was used for the single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SCENIC) analysis 14 . AUCell was used to evaluate the activity of each regulon in each cell. 2.13. Spatial transcriptomics data analysis The spatial transcriptomics (ST) slide was printed with one capture area from a mouse with silicosis. Gene expression information for the ST slide was captured by the Visium Spatial platform from 10x Genomics using spatially barcoded mRNA-binding oligonucleotides in the standard protocol. Then, Space Ranger was used to quality-check and map the raw sequencing reads of spatial transcriptomics. The Seurat R package was used to analyze the gene-spot matrices produced after ST data processing from ST and the Visium sample. Spots with less than 500 genes or 1500 UMIs, and more than 25% mitochondrial genes were removed from the further analysis. The genes expressed in fewer than three spots were filtered. Normalization across spots was performed using the SCTransform function, followed by dimensionality reduction and clustering. The multimodal intersection analysis (MIA) 15 integrated the scRNA-seq and ST data to explore the distribution of a certain cell type in the spatial region. The MIA method is based on the hypergeometric test of the overlap between the cell type-specific genes of single-cell data and the tissue region-specific genes of ST data to assess the cell type enrichment degrees. The SpatialFeaturePlot function in Seurat generated spatial feature expression plots. DEGs of the spatial domains were identified by the FindAllMarkers function, and enrichment analysis was performed using the clusterProfiler package based on the Gene Ontology gene sets. Gene set scoring was performed using the gene set variation analysis (GSVA) package (V.1.46.0) for spatial transcriptomics data based on the gene sets in the Molecular Signatures Database. 2.14. Statistics Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 9.0. Two groups of comparisons were evaluated by unpaired Student’s t-test. When multiple groups were compared, one-way ANOVA analysis was applied. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3. Results 3.1. Lung inflammation and fibrosis are the major hallmarks of silicosis in mouse models To explore the complexity of cell components in the silicotic pulmonary microenvironment, we first constructed the silica-induced silicosis mouse model ( Figure 1A ). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining ( Figure 1B ) of lung tissues showed obvious silicotic nodules in the silicosis mice. Masson staining further indicated the collagen deposition in the fibrotic nodules ( Figure 1B ). Consistently, the measurement of hydroxyproline (HYP) contents confirmed that these silica-treated mice developed robust fibrosis 42 days post-administration ( Figure 1C ). The above results suggest the silica-induced lung fibrosis model exhibits the similar lung pathological features of silicotic lesions observed in patients with silicosis 1 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Silica-induced silicosis is characterized by significant pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis (A) Schematic of the experimental design. (B) HE staining and Masson staining of the lung tissue of mice exposed to PBS or silica (n = 8 per group). Representative images were shown (scale bars=100 µm). (C) The hydroxyproline contents in lung tissues of mice exposed to PBS or silica (n = 8 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical testing was performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (D) Heatmap for multiplex analysis of cytokines in BALFs for indicated groups of mice (n = 4 per group). (E) Bar plots showing selected differentially expressed cytokines in BALFs from (D) (n = 4 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. Unpaired Student’s t-test evaluated comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. The phagocytosis of silica particles by alveolar macrophages leads to persistent lung inflammation, which may trigger fibrosis 1 . By the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), we found that a series of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-6 are markedly increased in the lung tissues of silicosis group (Supplemental Figure 1), suggesting the role of these cytokines in driving the development of lung silicosis 3 . To fully characterize the altered pro-fibrotic factors in the silicosis mice, we next determined the secretion of cytokines and chemokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs) of control and silicosis mice by cytokine multiplex analysis ( Figure 1D , E). Many canonical pro-inflammatory factors, including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl7, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl10, etc. , were significantly elevated in mice with silicosis. Since these factors may compensate each other in triggering an excessive immune response, our results demonstrate that targeting one single factor may be insufficient for treating silicosis. We thus focus on deciphering the important cell components that contribute to the formation of the complex microenvironment. 3.2. Overview of Single Cells Derived from Lung Tissues of Mice with or without Silicosis To identify the cell component(s) that may contribute to the secretion of these pro-inflammatory factors, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on cell suspensions of lung tissues from the silicosis mice (n=3) and normal lung samples from the control mice (n=2). After quality filtering and batch effects removal, we obtained a total of 46,006 cells for further analysis. Nine major cell clusters, including immune cells and non-immune cells, have been identified and visualized by clustering analysis (Supplemental Figure 2A, B). The distinct clusters were annotated by canonical cell type-specific genes (Supplemental Figure 2C). The atlas of immune cells demonstrated altered proportions of several cell types, including myeloid cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, etc. (Supplemental Figure 2D). We next explored the important cell components that contribute to the formation of silicosis nodules. Among the major cell clusters, the proportion of myeloid cells markedly increased in the silica exposure group, compared to those in the control group (Supplemental Figure 2D). According to the expression of marker genes (Supplemental Figure 3C), we further clustered all myeloid cells into 7 subpopulations representing macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells, respectively (Supplemental Figure 3A, B). Macrophages, as the most abundant population in the myeloid lineage, showed a slight increase in silicosis lung tissue (Supplemental Figure 3D). After curating the data, we found that pro-inflammatory genes (Il6, Il18, Il1b, Il1a, Tnf) 16 , 17 , differentially expressed chemokines (Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl7, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl5) detected in BALFs ( Figure 1 ), and profibrotic genes (Il10, Mmp12, Igf1, Pdgfa, Pdgfb, Spp1, Tgfb1, Tgfbi, Lgmn, Mmp9, Mmp14, Timp1) 16 , 18 , 19 are predominantly highly expressed in macrophages (Supplemental Figure 3E). The finding suggests that silicosis-associated pulmonary macrophages contribute to silica-induced inflammation and fibrosis. 3.3. Mmp12 hi macrophages are significantly expanded in silica-induced fibrosis lung tissue We next explored the heterogeneity of macrophages in the silica-induced fibrotic lung tissues. The aforementioned macrophages (Supplemental Figure 3) were further divided into three clusters, including Mmp12 hi macrophages, Fabp4 hi macrophages, and proliferating macrophages, based on the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively ( Figure 2A-C ). Among these populations, Fabp4 hi macrophages represent the resident alveolar macrophages (AMs), and highly express many AM-specific genes including Siglecf, Marco, Mrc1, Fabp4, Pparg, Il18, Car4, Ear2, and Ear1. Of note, the proportion of these Fabp4 hi macrophages within the total macrophage population in silica-exposed mice was significantly reduced, probably caused by silica particles-induced pyroptosis via activating NLRP3 inflammasome 20 ( Figure 2D ). Proliferating macrophages expressed both AM-related genes (Siglecf, Marco, Mrc1, Pparg, Il18, Car4, Ear2, and Ear1) and cell proliferation signature genes (Mki67 and Top2a). The proportion of this cluster was slightly increased in silica-exposed lung tissues, indicating the recovery of the resident population following the silica-induced inflammatory response ( Figure 2D ). Notably, the subpopulation of Mmp12 hi macrophages, characterized by the high expression of the marker genes Mmp12, Fabp5, Spp1, Trem2, and Gpnmb, is predominantly enriched in silicosis lung tissues compared with normal lung tissues ( Figure 2D ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Mmp12 hi macrophages are enriched in silica-induced lung tissue. (A) t-SNE plot for macrophages, color-coded by cell types (A) (B) t-SNE plot for macrophages, color-coded by groups (n = 3 in silicosis mice group and n =2 in control mice group). (B) Dot plot of the average expression of highly expressed genes for each subpopulation. The dot size shows the fraction of expressing cells, and the dots are colored based on the expression levels. (C) Bar plots showing the average proportion of each macrophage cell type from each group. (D) The GO pathway enrichment analysis using DEGs of Mmp12 hi macrophages versus other macrophages to explore the functions of Mmp12 hi macrophages. (E) Heatmap of gene expression of pro-inflammatory genes (Il6, Il18, Il1b, Il1a, Tnf), selected differentially expressed chemokines detected in BALFs in Figure 1 (Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl7, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl5), and profibrotic genes (Il10, Mmp12, Igf1, Pdgfa, Pdgfb, Spp1, Tgfb1, Tgfbi, Lgmn, Mmp9, Mmp14, Timp1) for each macrophage subtype from all samples. (F) Violin plot showing module scores of the Hallmark Inflammatory Response gene set in each macrophage subtype from all samples. (G) Violin plot showing module scores of the WP Lung Fibrosis gene set in each macrophage subtype from all samples. Then, Monocle2 was utilized to infer cell trajectories for investigating the cell fate transition of these macrophage subsets (Supplemental Figure 4A). The results of pseudotime analysis showed that Mmp12 hi macrophages are derived from Ly6c + monocytes, and then differentiated into the resident macrophages (Supplemental Figure 4A). We hypothesized that inhaled silica particles drive monocytes toward this signature of the Mmp12 hi macrophages. We further applied pySCENIC to assess which transcription factors underlie differences in gene expression between different macrophage subsets. We found that the transcription factor MafB is one of the top five differential transcription factors dominantly expressed in the subtype of Mmp12 hi macrophages (Supplemental Figure 4B). Since MafB has been known as a transcription factor that controls monocyte differentiation into monocyte-derived macrophages 21 , these analyses further supported that the Mmp12 hi macrophages originate from monocytes. We then investigated the functional characteristics of Mmp12 hi macrophages, as these cells are significantly increased in the silicosis group. The GO pathway enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs of Mmp12 hi macrophages were mainly enriched in positive regulation of response to external stimulus, regulation of cell migration or chemotaxis, and cytokine-mediated signaling pathway ( Figure 2E ). Besides, these Mmp12 hi macrophages also highly expressed pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and pro-fibrotic genes ( Figure 2F ). Moreover, we validated these findings by using the AddmoduleScore function, and confirmed that the inflammatory response-related and lung fibrosis-related scores of Mmp12 hi macrophages are much higher than other subpopulations of macrophages ( Figure 2G , H). These results indicated that these Mmp12 hi macrophages play a crucial role in the formation of silicosis nodules by triggering the pro-inflammation responses after differentiation into a pro-fibrotic phase. 3.4. Mmp12 hi macrophages are predominantly enriched in silicotic nodule lesions Given the central role of fibroblasts in silicosis 22 , we also clustered fibroblasts into resting fibroblasts and myofibroblasts according to their characteristic genes (Supplemental Figure 5A-C). However, the proportion of myofibroblasts only showed a mild increase in the lung tissue of the silicosis group (Supplemental Figure 5D), inconsistent with previous results that the proportion of activated myofibroblasts is significantly increased in the bleomycin model of pulmonary fibrosis 23 . These data suggested that the process of digesting lung tissue for preparing single-cell suspensions may result in the loss of some specific cell populations, including myofibroblasts. To solve this problem, we further performed spatial transcriptomics to reveal the spatial localization of different types of cells in silicosis nodules. To clarify the microenvironment of the silicotic nodules and the spatial localization of Mmp12 hi macrophages, we collected lung tissue from the mouse with silicosis and applied for parallel spatial transcriptomics and scRNA-seq analysis. The spatial region was first divided into two clusters by principal component analysis (PCA), consistent with the distribution of silicotic nodules and relatively normal areas in HE. Accordingly, we annotated the spatial region as “nodules of lesion” and “non-nodular area” ( Figure 3A ). The scRNA-seq defined similar cell populations as mentioned above ( Figure 2 , Supplemental Figure 2, Supplemental Figure 3). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Spatial sequencing revealed the spatial localization of Mmp12 hi macrophages (A) HE staining of one representative silicosis mouse lung section for spatial transcriptomics analysis (top); the spatial region was annotated as “nodules of lesion” and “non-nodular area” (bottom). (B) Spatial feature plots showing scores across lung sections of the Hallmark Inflammatory Response gene set (left) and the WP Lung Fibrosis gene set (right). (C) The silicosis MIA map of all scRNA-seq-identified cell types and ST-defined regions. The numbers of cell type- and tissue region-specific genes used in the calculation are shown. Red indicates enrichment (significantly high overlap); blue indicates depletion (significantly low overlap). (D-H) Spatially resolved gene expression of Mmp12 hi macrophage-associated signature genes, including Mmp12, Trem2, Spp1, Gpnmb, and Fabp5, in silicosis lung sections. To investigate the areas of inflammation and fibrosis in the lung tissue section, we visualized module scores of the Hallmark Inflammatory Response gene set and the WP Lung Fibrosis gene set in the spatial sequencing data ( Figure 3B ). We found that the nodule lesion region scored highly for both inflammatory response and lung fibrosis gene sets, demonstrating higher inflammation and fibrosis activity in these regions. The results are similar to recent findings that showed a strong positive association between inflammation and fibrosis module scores in aged mice lungs post-influenza infection 24 , suggesting that the chronic inflammation is closely related with the development of fibrosis in the lung tissue with silicosis. Previous studies have shown that inflammation influences cell-cell communications within the niche of fibrosis 25 . Thus, we performed the multimodal intersection analysis (MIA) to integrate the scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics data, aiming to identify the main cell population(s) enriched in the lesion niches of the lung. We found that the nodules lesion region was mainly composed of macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and fibroblasts ( Figure 3C ), confirmed by immunohistochemical staining of lung tissue from mice with silicosis for the macrophage marker Cd68, the fibroblasts marker Col1a1, and the neutrophils marker Ly6g (Supplemental Figure 5E). As expected, tissue mapping revealed that the Mmp12 hi macrophages localize almost exclusively to the nodule lesion area ( Figure 3C ). Similarly, Mmp12 hi macrophage-associated signature genes, such as Mmp12, Trem2, Spp1, Gpnmb, and Fabp5, are basically all relatively highly expressed in the nodule lesion region ( Figure 3D-H ). This result reinforced our earlier finding that these genes define a core signature for this subset of silicosis-related macrophages in the lungs. We further investigated the spatial DEGs between “nodules of lesion” and “non-nodular area”. The GO pathway enrichment analysis suggested that many enriched pathways, such as positive regulation of response to external stimulus, cell chemotaxis, regulation of leukocyte migration, and cytokine-mediated signaling pathway, in the nodules lesion region are similar to those found previously in Mmp12 hi macrophages (Supplemental Figure 5F). In conclusion, these results suggested that Mmp12 hi macrophages are mainly enriched in the silicotic nodules region, and may contribute to promoting the formation of pro-fibrotic microenvironment. 3.5. Cell-cell interactions between Mmp12 hi macrophages with neutrophils and fibroblasts may play a critical role in silicosis To further infer the role of Mmp12 hi macrophages in fibrotic nodules, we used the ligand-receptor interaction tool CellChat to identify potential cell-cell communication as described 13 . Circle plots showed the number and strength of outgoing signals from Mmp12 hi macrophages to neutrophils or fibroblasts, both increased in the silicosis group compared with the control group ( Figure 4A , B). Information flow analysis showed that several signaling pathways associated with pro-fibrosis activity, such as FN1 and SPP1, are upregulated under silicosis conditions ( Figure 4C ). Signaling pathways involving cytokines and chemokines, including CCLs and CXCLs, were also markedly upregulated in silica-induced lung tissue. We further inferred the ligand-receptor interactions between macrophages and other cells (monocytes, neutrophils, and fibroblasts) in silicosis and normal lung tissues. In particular, the ligand-receptor interactions related to cytokine and chemokine pathways between Mmp12 hi macrophages and neutrophils are significantly enhanced in the silicosis model group ( Figure 4D ). Of note, the ligand-receptor interactions associated with pro-fibrosis, such as SPP1-CD44 and FN1-ITGAV/ITGB1, which are absent between Mmp12 hi macrophages and fibroblasts in the control group, are highly activated in silicosis group ( Figure 4E ). Taken together, these results indicate the interactions of Mmp12 hi macrophages with neutrophils and fibroblasts, are critical event that modulates the inflammatory damage and shapes a pro-fibrotic environment. 3.6. Group 2 macrophages in silicosis patients have similar gene expression features to Mmp12 hi macrophages in mice To further validate the above findings in human samples, we reanalyzed published scRNA-seq data for the BALFs derived from three patients with silicosis and two co-workers without silicosis 26 . A total of 22601 cells from five samples were obtained for subsequent analysis. Based on the canonical signature genes, we identified several major clusters including myeloid cells, neutrophils, T cells, B cells, megakaryocytes, and epithelial cells (Supplemental Figure 6A, B). Macrophages were further extracted from the myeloid lineage (Supplemental Figure 6C, D) and re-clustered to evaluate the heterogeneity. According to the characteristic genes, we divided these macrophages into three groups, including group 1 macrophages (Mac.Group1), group 2 macrophages (Mac.Group2), and proliferative macrophages, respectively ( Figure 5A-C ). We found that similar to Mmp12 hi macrophages in mice, the group 2 macrophage in the BALFs of human subjects exhibited characteristic signatures including MMP12, SPP1, FABP5, GPNMB, and TREM2. Moreover, the group 2 macrophages are also significantly enriched in the BALFs of silicosis patients ( Figure 5D ). The GO pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs of group 2 macrophages revealed that pathways enriched in these cells highly resemble those of Mmp12 hi macrophages in mice (Supplemental Figure 6E). By comparing the transcriptomic features, we found that human group 2 macrophages show similar signatures with Mmp12 hi macrophages in mice, and express high levels of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic related genes ( Figure 5E-G ), suggesting the functional similarity of the subset of macrophages in human and mice. These results suggested the potential pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic role of the group 2 macrophages in the pathogenesis of silicosis patients, which is consistent with the role of Mmp12 hi macrophages in mice. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Cellchat analysis of the communication between cells in the control and silicosis group. (A) Visualization and analysis of cell-cell communication in control and silicosis group using CellChat. Circle plots placing Mmp12 hi macrophage subsets as the central nodes of analysis. An interaction between a pair of cell types is depicted by a line connecting two cell types. The thickness of the line represents the number of that interaction. (B) Visualization and analysis of cell-cell communication in control and silicosis group using CellChat. Circle plots placing Mmp12 hi macrophage subsets as the central nodes of analysis. An interaction between a pair of cell types is depicted by a line connecting two cell types. The thickness of the line represents the strength of that interaction. (C) Signaling pathways ranked by differential overall information flow of inferred interactions in control (red) and silicosis (blue) samples. (D) Dot plot showing predicted interactions between CCL and CXCL chemokine ligands produced by Mmp12 hi macrophages and receptors on neutrophils or monocytes at the control or silicosis mice group. Color denotes communication probability; size denotes p-value. (E) Dot plot showing predicted interactions between fibrosis-related FN1, SPP1, and TGFb ligands produced by Mmp12 hi macrophages and receptors on fibroblasts at the control or silicosis mice group. Color denotes communication probability; size denotes p-value. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Group 2 macrophages in patients with silicosis resemble Mmp12 hi macrophages in silica-induced mice models. (A) t-SNE plot for macrophages and monocytes, color-coded by cell types. (B) t-SNE plot for macrophages and monocytes, color-coded by groups (n = 3 in silicosis patients group and n =2 in control group of exposure miners). (C) Dot plot of the average expression of highly expressed genes for each subpopulation. The dot size shows the fraction of expressing cells, and the dots are colored based on the expression levels. (D) Bar plots showing the average proportion of each cell type from each group. (E) GSEA analysis of DEGs of human Group 2 macrophages versus other macrophages using signatures of Mmp12 hi macrophages in mouse dataset. (F) GSEA analysis of DEGs of mouse Mmp12 hi macrophages versus other macrophages using signatures of Group 2 macrophages in human dataset. (G) Heatmap of gene expression of pro-inflammatory genes (IL6, IL18, IL1B, IL1A, TNF), selected differentially expressed chemokines detected in BALFs in Figure 1 (CCL2, CCL3, CCL7, CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL5), and profibrotic genes (IL10, MMP12, IGF1, PDGFA, PDGFB, SPP1, TGFB1, TGFBI, LGMN, MMP9, MMP14, TIMP1) for each macrophage subtype from all samples. 3.7. 4–OI may ameliorate silicosis-related inflammation and lung fibrosis by affecting Mmp12 hi macrophages In addition to the expression of Mmp12, Spp1, Gpnmb, Fabp5, and Trem2, immune responsive gene 1 (Irg1) is also markedly increased in the Mmp12 hi macrophages of silicosis mice ( Figure 6A ). Irg1, highly expressed in activated macrophages, can mediate itaconate production in response to inflammation 27 . Ogger et al. have reported the role of itaconate in controlling the severity of pulmonary fibrosis 28 . As the cell-permeable derivative of itaconate, 4-OI has been widely investigated due to the anti-inflammatory activity 29 , 30 . The anti-fibrotic effect of 4-OI has also been documented in the bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis model 31 . Some studies have revealed that 4-OI can significantly reduce macrophage infiltration in lung tissue during inflammatory diseases 32 , 33 . We thus designed in vivo studies to determine the therapeutic effect of 4-OI in silicosis. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. 4-OI treatment may partially rescue the pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice with silicosis by reducing the subset of Mmp12 hi macrophages. (A) Volcano plot showing the DEGs for Mmp12 hi macrophages in silicosis mice versus control mice. (B) Schematic plot for the 4-OI treatment schedule and study design. (C) The hydroxyproline contents in mice lung tissues of different groups (n = 4-6 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA evaluated comparisons for multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (D) HE staining and Masson staining of the mice lung tissues of different groups (n = 4-6 per group). Representative images were shown (scale bars=100 µm). (E) mRNA expression of Col1a1, Il-1β, Tnf-α, and Il6 in mice lung tissues from the indicated group of mice in (B) was detected by qPCR (n = 4-6 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA evaluated comparisons for multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. (F) mRNA expression of Mmp12 hi macrophage-associated signature genes in mice lung tissues from the indicated group of mice in (B) was detected by qPCR (n = 4-6 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA evaluated comparisons for multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Mice were intratracheally administered sterile PBS or silica suspension at day 0. Solvent or 4-OI was intraperitoneally injected every other day for treatments ( Figure 6B ). Silicosis mice were sacrificed at 42 days after PBS or silica instillation, and analyzed with histology and hydroxyproline detection kit ( Figure 6B-D ). We found silicosis-related pathological changes in H&E staining are obviously alleviated after 4-OI treatment ( Figure 6D ). Moreover, 4-OI therapeutically inhibited the mRNA expression levels of pro-inflammatory factors, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, in lung tissues ( Figure 6E ). The severity of pulmonary fibrosis, as evaluated by the Masson staining, the hydroxyproline test, and Col1a1 mRNA levels, was also attenuated by the 4-OI treatment ( Figure 6C-E ). More importantly, the mRNA expression levels of characteristic genes associated with Mmp12 hi macrophages in lung tissues were significantly reduced in the 4-OI treatment group ( Figure 6F ). Taken together, our results indicated that 4-OI may attenuate the lung inflammatory response and fibrosis in the silicosis mouse model by reducing the infiltration of Mmp12 hi macrophages. Targeting these Mmp12 hi macrophages is expected to become a potential way to treat silicosis. 4. Discussion Silicosis is a potentially fatal occupational disease characterized by lung inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis, and impaired lung function, but current therapeutic strategies are limited, probably due to unclear molecular mechanism 1 . Though activated fibroblasts are the major component in fibrotic lesions, the role of macrophages has been highlighted in inflammation, tissue remodeling, and fibrosis 6 . Therefore, it is essential to identify disease-associated macrophage subpopulations in silicosis to guide precision therapy. In this study, we used multiplex cytokine analysis, scRNA-seq, and spatial transcriptomics to reveal the silicosis microenvironment. We found the levels of many canonical pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were significantly increased in the BALFs derived from mice with silicosis. We further identified a population of monocytes-derived Mmp12 hi macrophages that expand markedly in silica-induced fibrosis lung tissue. These Mmp12 hi macrophages are mainly localized to silicotic nodule lesions and highly express inflammation-related cytokines, chemokines, and fibrosis-related factors, suggesting a potentially crucial role in silicosis. Mmp12 hi macrophages in the mouse model shared similar gene expression features and functions with the subsets in BALFs of patients with silicosis. These findings provide possible targets for clinical intervention of silicosis. Pulmonary macrophages are heterogeneous populations that can be divided into subsets based on their localization, origin, function, etc. 6 . Lv et al. have found that in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, macrophage subpopulations change dynamically with disease progression 34 . The steady-state AMs quickly decreased during inflammatory responses and replenished with monocyte-derived macrophages 34 . Misharin et al. have revealed the contribution of monocyte-derived macrophages on the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis 35 . Our study found that a population of monocyte-derived macrophages characterized by relatively high expression of Mmp12 is significantly enriched in silica-induced lung fibrosis, suggesting these cells may promote the pathogenesis of silicosis. Yi et al. have found that MMP12 may contribute to the development of subretinal fibrosis by promoting macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition 36 . In the present study, we focused on the characteristics of this subpopulation of Mmp12 hi macrophages, other than Mmp12 itself. Our scRNA-seq data revealed that this subset, besides highly expressing Mmp12, also expresses a series of characteristic genes, such as Spp1, Gpnmb, Fabp5, and Trem2. These silicosis-related genes observed in Mmp12 hi macrophages were also found highly expressed in some subsets of macrophages found in other diseases, such as scar-associated pro-fibrotic TREM2 + CD9 + macrophages in liver fibrosis 8 and lipid-associated macrophages in obese adipose tissue 37 . Our study indicated that silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis was characterized by the depletion of Fabp4 hi AMs and the enrichment of monocyte-derived Mmp12 hi macrophages in the lung. Wang et al. also found that proinflammatory monocyte-derived interstitial macrophage induced by silica contributed to the pathogenesis of silicosis 38 . Our results showed that the DEGs of Mmp12 hi macrophages were enriched in positive regulation of response to external stimulus, regulation of cell migration or chemotaxis, and cytokine-mediated signaling pathway. To some extent, these were consistent with the results of multiplex cytokine analysis of BALFs from mice, which suggested an enrichment of inflammation-related cytokines and chemokines in the silicosis microenvironment. These findings indicated the critical role of Mmp12 hi macrophages in guiding the migration of other inflammatory cells by producing various cytokines or chemokines when exposed to external stimuli, which may contribute to silica-induced lung inflammation injury. Our previous study revealed that Mmp12 + macrophages were the primary source of inflammatory factors during Pneumocystis infection 7 . Conway et al. identified a novel cluster of Mmp12 + macrophages that play the role of repair after the kidney injury, and they resemble the transcriptome of monocytes that infiltrate the kidney during recovery from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury 39 . Consistent with these studies, we found that silicosis-related Mmp12 hi macrophages highly expressed pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic genes. The inflammatory response-related and lung fibrosis-related scores were also highest in Mmp12 hi macrophages among all subpopulations of macrophages, demonstrating that Mmp12 hi macrophages, exhibited a mixed M1/M2 phenotype, contributing to both inflammation and fibrosis in silicosis. Silicotic nodules are composed of two distinct zones, termed as central and peripheral zone, respectively. The central zone contains collagen fibers, while the peripheral zone mainly consists of fibroblasts and dust-laden macrophages 1 . We used spatial transcriptomics combined with scRNA-seq to characterize the distribution of cell subtypes in silicosis tissues and the microenvironment of silicotic nodules. Our results similarly found that the predominant components of silicotic nodules lesions were macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and fibroblasts. Macrophages are the most common type of immune cell in silicotic nodules. Importantly, we found that this subpopulation of Mmp12 hi macrophages, which expand markedly in silica-induced fibrosis lung tissue, are distributed almost exclusively in the region of silicotic nodule lesions. Besides, the cell-cell interaction circle plots suggest the increased number and intensity of interactions between this subset of macrophages with other cells distributed in silicotic nodules, such as neutrophils and fibroblasts. On the one hand, monocyte-derived Mmp12 hi macrophages may secrete several pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic factors that contribute to a microenvironment of persistent inflammation and fibrosis in silicotic nodules. On the other hand, the cluster of Mmp12 hi macrophages activates neutrophils or fibroblasts directly. Crosstalk between macrophages and neutrophils or fibroblasts has been widely reported in the tumor microenvironment 40 , 41 , and disrupting these interactions has been considered a potential treatment target to improve immunotherapy. In summary, our results suggested a central role for Mmp12 hi macrophages in the cell interaction network in the silicosis microenvironment. The interactions of Mmp12 hi macrophages with neutrophils and fibroblasts in silicotic nodules still need to be deeply studied in the future, and exploring the method to block the interaction between Mmp12 hi macrophages and other cells may be a novel strategy for silicosis treatment. 4-OI is a cell-permeable derivative of itaconate, which has received much attention for its ability to exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects through activating nuclear factor-related factor 2 (Nrf2) 29 . Prior studies have demonstrated the ability of 4-OI to inhibit lung macrophage infiltration in inflammatory diseases 32 , 33 . However, the effectiveness of 4-OI against silicosis is unknown. Therefore, we sought to explore the therapeutic roles of 4-OI in silicosis mice models. Our results showed that 4-OI could ameliorate silica-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. We further found that 4-OI significantly decreased the mRNA expression levels of Mmp12 hi macrophages-related genes in lung tissues, implying the reduction in the infiltration of Mmp12 hi macrophages. These data provided a potential explanation for the protective role of 4-OI in silicosis and suggested that 4-OI may ameliorate silicosis by blocking the recruitment of disease-related monocytes-derived Mmp12 hi macrophages to lung tissues. Similar to Mmp12 hi macrophages, a subset of pro-fibrotic macrophages is also enriched in BALF of silicosis patients ( Figure 5 ), highly resembling the pro-fibrotic SPP1 hi macrophages found in the lungs of IPF patients 9 . Park et al. reported that disease-associated macrophages are potential targets for intervention 42 . Nowadays, some studies about therapeutic strategies targeting macrophages in pulmonary fibrosis focus more on modulating macrophage polarization 43 , 44 . It has been explored that the effect of specifically depleting a specific subpopulation of macrophages in BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis 45 , with the finding that more collagen deposition and inflammatory cell infiltration were observed in the lungs of mice lacking the specific macrophage subset. In silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis models, depletion of pro-fibrotic C1q + interstitial macrophages has been found to inhibit fibroblast activation but promote inflammation 19 . Therefore, targeted macrophage therapy still has a long way to go, and our findings may provide some reference value for targeted macrophage therapy in silicosis. In conclusion, we first proposed a subset of pro-fibrotic Mmp12 hi macrophages featured by conferring considerable pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects in the lungs of mice with silicosis by scRNA-seq analysis. We also clarified the localization of Mmp12 hi macrophages and their crosstalk with other neighboring cells by spatial transcriptomics and cell-cell interaction analysis, revealing their potential roles in silicotic nodule lesions formation. Treatment of 4-OI exerted anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects in silicosis, probably by reducing the recruitment of Mmp12 hi macrophages. These findings illustrated that Mmp12 hi macrophages may represent potential targets for treating silicosis individuals. Data availability statements The data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Ethics Statement The animal study was approved by the Animal Experiments and Experimental Animal Welfare Committee of Capital Medical University. Disclosure These authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. Author contributions ZT and NS conceived and designed the study. HK, XG, and SC performed the experiments. HK and XG analyzed the data, performed bioinformatic analysis, and drafted the manuscript. ZT and NS revised the final manuscript. All of the authors have approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070005, 82270009, 82172278), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC0872500), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JQ22019), the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH2022-1-1061), the Beijing Scholars Program (No. 062), the Reform and Development Program of Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine. Supplemental Figure 1. mRNA expression of Il1-β, Tnf-α, and Il6 in mice lung tissues from the indicated group of mice in Figure 1 (A) was detected by qPCR (n = 8 per group). The results are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical testing was performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Supplemental Figure 2. Overview of infiltrating cell types in silica-induced lung fibrosis model. (A) t-SNE plot for single cells derived from lung tissues of mice with or without silicosis, color-coded by cell types. (B) t-SNE plot for single cells derived from lung tissues of mice with or without silicosis, color-coded by groups (n = 3 in silicosis mice group and n =2 in control mice group). (C) Dot plot depicting the average expression levels of canonical cell type-specific marker genes. The dot size shows the fraction of expressing cells, and the dots are colored based on the gene expression levels. (D) Bar plots showing the percent of different types of cells in total cells from each group. Supplemental Figure 3. Dissection of myeloid cells indicating the potential pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic role of macrophages during silica exposure. (A) t-SNE plot for myeloid cells, color-coded by cell types. (B) t-SNE plot for myeloid cells, color-coded by groups (n = 3 in silicosis mice group and n =2 in control mice group). (C) Dot plot depicting each cell type’s average expression levels of canonical markers. The dot size shows the fraction of expressing cells, and the dots are colored based on the gene expression levels. (D) Bar plots showing the average proportion of each myeloid cell type from each group. (E) Heatmap of gene expression of pro-inflammatory genes (Il6, Il18, Il1b, Il1a, Tnf), selected differentially expressed chemokines detected in BALFs in Figure 1 (Ccl2, Ccl3, Ccl7, Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl5), and profibrotic genes (Il10, Mmp12, Igf1, Pdgfa, Pdgfb, Spp1, Tgfb1, Tgfbi, Lgmn, Mmp9, Mmp14, Timp1) for each myeloid cell subpopulation from all samples. Supplemental Figure 4. (A) Differentiation trajectory inferred of Mmp12 hi macrophage via Monocle2 using Ly6c + monocytes and all macrophages from all samples, colored by derived pseudotime (left) and cell type (right). (B) Heatmap of the area under the curve (AUC) scores of expression regulation by transcription factors, as estimated using pySCENIC. Shown are the top five differential transcription factors in each macrophage subtype. Supplemental Figure 5. (A) t-SNE plot for fibroblasts derived from lung tissues of mice with or without silicosis, color-coded by cell types. (B) t-SNE plot for fibroblasts derived from lung tissues of mice with or without silicosis, color-coded by groups (n = 3 in silicosis mice group and n =2 in control mice group). (C) Dot plot depicting the average expression levels of canonical fibroblasts cell type-specific marker genes. (D) Bar plots showing the percent of different types of fibroblasts in total fibroblasts from each group (n = 3 in silicosis mice group and n =2 in control mice group). (E) Representative images of immunohistochemical staining of Cd68 (top), Col1a1 (middle), and Ly6g (bottom) expression in control (left) and silicosis (right) mice lung tissues (n = 5 per group, and scale bars=50 µm). (F) The GO pathway enrichment analysis using spatial DEGs of “nodules of lesion” versus “non-nodular area”. Supplemental Figure 6. (A) t-SNE plot for single cells derived from BALFs of patients with or without silicosis, color-coded by cell types. (B) Dot plot depicting the average expression levels of canonical cell type-specific marker genes. (C) t-SNE plot for myeloid cells derived from BALFs of patients with or without silicosis, color-coded by cell types. (D) Dot plot depicting the average expression levels of canonical myeloid cells type-specific marker genes. (E) The GO pathway enrichment analysis using DEGs of Group 2 macrophages versus others to explore the functions of Group 2 macrophages. Acknowledgments Not applicable. References 2. ↵ Leung CC , Yu IT , Chen W. Silicosis . Lancet . May 26 2012 ; 379 ( 9830 ): 2008 - 18 . doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60235-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 2. ↵ Hoy RF , Chambers DC . Silica-related diseases in the modern world . Allergy . Nov 2020 ; 75 ( 11 ): 2805 – 2817 . doi: 10.1111/all.14202 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Adamcakova J , Mokra D . New Insights into Pathomechanisms and Treatment Possibilities for Lung Silicosis . Int J Mol Sci . Apr 17 2021 ; 22 ( 8 ) doi: 10.3390/ijms22084162 OpenUrl CrossRef 4. ↵ Zhao Y , Hao C , Bao L , et al. Silica particles disorganize the polarization of pulmonary macrophages in mice . Ecotoxicol Environ Saf . Apr 15 2020 ; 193 : 110364 . doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110364 OpenUrl CrossRef 5. ↵ Nahrendorf M , Swirski FK . Abandoning M1/M2 for a Network Model of Macrophage Function . Circ Res . Jul 22 2016 ; 119 ( 3 ): 414 – 7 . doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.309194 OpenUrl FREE Full Text 6. ↵ Bain CC , MacDonald AS . The impact of the lung environment on macrophage development, activation and function: diversity in the face of adversity . Mucosal Immunol . Feb 2022 ; 15 ( 2 ): 223 – 234 . doi: 10.1038/s41385-021-00480-w OpenUrl CrossRef 7. ↵ Wang Y , Li K , Zhao W , et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the altered transcriptomic characteristics of pulmonary macrophages in immunocompromised hosts with Pneumocystis pneumonia . Front Immunol . 2023 ; 14 : 1179094 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1179094 OpenUrl CrossRef 8. ↵ Ramachandran P , Dobie R , Wilson-Kanamori JR , et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level . Nature . Nov 2019 ; 575 ( 7783 ): 512 - 518 . doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Morse C , Tabib T , Sembrat J , et al. Proliferating SPP1/MERTK-expressing macrophages in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis . Eur Respir J . Aug 2019 ; 54 ( 2 ) doi: 10.1183/13993003.02441-2018 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 10. ↵ Wang M , Zhang Z , Liu J , et al. Gefitinib and fostamatinib target EGFR and SYK to attenuate silicosis: a multi-omics study with drug exploration . Signal Transduct Target Ther . May 13 2022 ; 7 ( 1 ): 157 . doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00959-3 OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Butler A , Hoffman P , Smibert P , Papalexi E , Satija R . Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species . Nat Biotechnol . Jun 2018 ; 36 ( 5 ): 411 – 420 . doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Qiu X , Mao Q , Tang Y , et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories . Nat Methods . Oct 2017 ; 14 ( 10 ): 979 – 982 . doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4402 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Jin S , Guerrero-Juarez CF , Zhang L , et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat . Nat Commun . Feb 17 2021 ; 12 ( 1 ): 1088 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 14. ↵ Aibar S , González-Blas CB , Moerman T , et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering . Nat Methods . Nov 2017 ; 14 ( 11 ): 1083 – 1086 . doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4463 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Moncada R , Barkley D , Wagner F , et al. Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas . Nat Biotechnol . Mar 2020 ; 38 ( 3 ): 333 – 342 . doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0392-8 OpenUrl CrossRef 16. ↵ Wendisch D , Dietrich O , Mari T , et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers profibrotic macrophage responses and lung fibrosis . Cell . Dec 22 2021 ; 184 ( 26 ): 6243 – 6261 .e27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.033 OpenUrl CrossRef 17. ↵ Upadhyay AA , Viox EG , Hoang TN , et al. TREM2(+) and interstitial-like macrophages orchestrate airway inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques . Nat Commun . Apr 6 2023 ; 14 ( 1 ): 1914 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37425-9 OpenUrl CrossRef 18. ↵ Joshi N , Watanabe S , Verma R , et al. A spatially restricted fibrotic niche in pulmonary fibrosis is sustained by M-CSF/M-CSFR signalling in monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages . Eur Respir J . Jan 2020 ; 55 ( 1 ) doi: 10.1183/13993003.00646-2019 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 19. ↵ Ogawa T , Shichino S , Ueha S , Bando K , Matsushima K . Profibrotic properties of C1q(+) interstitial macrophages in silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice . Biochem Biophys Res Commun . Apr 9 2022 ; 599 : 113 – 119 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.02.037 OpenUrl CrossRef 20. ↵ Zhang L , Tian J , Ma L , Duan S . Mechanistic insights into severe pulmonary inflammation caused by silica stimulation: The role of macrophage pyroptosis . Ecotoxicol Environ Saf . Jun 15 2023 ; 258 : 114975 . doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114975 OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Vanneste D , Bai Q , Hasan S , et al. MafB-restricted local monocyte proliferation precedes lung interstitial macrophage differentiation . Nat Immunol . May 2023 ; 24 ( 5 ): 827 – 840 . doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01468-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Plikus MV , Wang X , Sinha S , et al. Fibroblasts: Origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease . Cell . Jul 22 2021 ; 184 ( 15 ): 3852 – 3872 . doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Peyser R , MacDonnell S , Gao Y , et al. Defining the Activated Fibroblast Population in Lung Fibrosis Using Single-Cell Sequencing . Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol . Jul 2019 ; 61 ( 1 ): 74 - 85 . doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2018-0313OC OpenUrl CrossRef 24. ↵ Kasmani MY , Topchyan P , Brown AK , et al. A spatial sequencing atlas of age-induced changes in the lung during influenza infection . Nat Commun . Oct 18 2023 ; 14 ( 1 ): 6597 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42021-y OpenUrl CrossRef 25. ↵ Eming SA , Wynn TA , Martin P . Inflammation and metabolism in tissue repair and regeneration . Science . Jun 9 2017 ; 356 ( 6342 ):1026-1030. doi: 10.1126/science.aam7928 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Peng Z , Duan M , Tang Y , et al. Impaired interferon-γ signaling promotes the development of silicosis . iScience . Jul 15 2022 ; 25 ( 7 ): 104647 . doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104647 OpenUrl CrossRef 27. ↵ Maassen S , Coenen B , Ioannidis M , et al. Itaconate promotes a wound resolving phenotype in pro-inflammatory macrophages . Redox Biol . Feb 2023 ; 59 : 102591 . doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102591 OpenUrl CrossRef 28. ↵ Ogger PP , Albers GJ , Hewitt RJ , et al. Itaconate controls the severity of pulmonary fibrosis . Sci Immunol . Oct 23 2020 ; 5 ( 52 ) doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abc1884 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Mills EL , Ryan DG , Prag HA , et al. Itaconate is an anti-inflammatory metabolite that activates Nrf2 via alkylation of KEAP1 . Nature . Apr 5 2018 ; 556 ( 7699 ): 113 - 117 . doi: 10.1038/nature25986 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Li W , Li Y , Kang J , et al. 4-octyl itaconate as a metabolite derivative inhibits inflammation via alkylation of STING . Cell Rep . Mar 28 2023 ; 42 ( 3 ): 112145 . doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112145 OpenUrl CrossRef 31. ↵ Wu YX , Zhang YR , Jiang FJ , et al. 4-OI ameliorates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by activating Nrf2 and suppressing macrophage-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition . Inflamm Res . Jun 2023 ; 72 ( 6 ): 1133 – 1145 . doi: 10.1007/s00011-023-01733-z OpenUrl CrossRef 32. ↵ Yang W , Wang Y , Huang Y , et al. Immune Response Gene-1 [IRG1]/itaconate protect against multi-organ injury via inhibiting gasdermin D-mediated pyroptosis and inflammatory response . Inflammopharmacology . Jul 20 2023 ; doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01278-x OpenUrl CrossRef 33. ↵ Wu YT , Xu WT , Zheng L , et al. 4-octyl itaconate ameliorates alveolar macrophage pyroptosis against ARDS via rescuing mitochondrial dysfunction and suppressing the cGAS/STING pathway . Int Immunopharmacol . May 2023 ; 118 : 110104 . doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110104 OpenUrl CrossRef 34. ↵ Lv J , Gao H , Ma J , et al. Dynamic atlas of immune cells reveals multiple functional features of macrophages associated with progression of pulmonary fibrosis . Front Immunol . 2023 ; 14 : 1230266 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1230266 OpenUrl CrossRef 35. ↵ Misharin AV , Morales-Nebreda L , Reyfman PA , et al. Monocyte-derived alveolar macrophages drive lung fibrosis and persist in the lung over the life span . J Exp Med . Aug 7 2017 ; 214 ( 8 ): 2387 – 2404 . doi: 10.1084/jem.20162152 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 36. ↵ Yi C , Liu J , Deng W , et al. Macrophage elastase (MMP12) critically contributes to the development of subretinal fibrosis . J Neuroinflammation . Apr 5 2022 ; 19 ( 1 ): 78 . doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02433-x OpenUrl CrossRef 37. ↵ Jaitin DA , Adlung L , Thaiss CA , et al. Lipid-Associated Macrophages Control Metabolic Homeostasis in a Trem2-Dependent Manner . Cell . Jul 25 2019 ; 178 ( 3 ): 686 – 698 .e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.054 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ Yuan H , You Y , He Y , et al. Crystalline Silica-Induced Proinflammatory Interstitial Macrophage Recruitment through Notch3 Signaling Promotes the Pathogenesis of Silicosis . Environ Sci Technol . Oct 3 2023 ; 57 ( 39 ): 14502 – 14514 . doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03980 OpenUrl CrossRef 39. ↵ Conway BR , O’Sullivan ED , Cairns C , et al. Kidney Single-Cell Atlas Reveals Myeloid Heterogeneity in Progression and Regression of Kidney Disease . J Am Soc Nephrol . Dec 2020 ; 31 ( 12 ): 2833 – 2854 . doi: 10.1681/asn.2020060806 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 40. ↵ Pratt HG , Steinberger KJ , Mihalik NE , et al. Macrophage and Neutrophil Interactions in the Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment Drive the Pathogenesis of Pancreatic Cancer . Cancers (Basel) . Dec 31 2021 ; 14 ( 1 ) doi: 10.3390/cancers14010194 OpenUrl CrossRef 41. ↵ Qi J , Sun H , Zhang Y , et al. Single-cell and spatial analysis reveal interaction of FAP(+) fibroblasts and SPP1(+) macrophages in colorectal cancer . Nat Commun . Apr 1 2022 ; 13 ( 1 ): 1742 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29366-6 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 42. ↵ Park MD , Silvin A , Ginhoux F , Merad M. Macrophages in health and disease . Cell . Nov 10 2022 ; 185 ( 23 ): 4259 - 4279 . doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.007 OpenUrl CrossRef 43. ↵ Kishore A , Petrek M . Roles of Macrophage Polarization and Macrophage-Derived miRNAs in Pulmonary Fibrosis . Front Immunol . 2021 ; 12 : 678457 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.678457 OpenUrl CrossRef 44. ↵ Liu S , Zhang Z , Wang Y , et al. The chemokine CCL1 facilitates pulmonary fibrosis by promoting macrophage migration and M2 polarization . Int Immunopharmacol . Jul 2023 ; 120 : 110343 . doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110343 OpenUrl CrossRef 45. ↵ Chakarov S , Lim HY , Tan L , et al. Two distinct interstitial macrophage populations coexist across tissues in specific subtissular niches . Science . Mar 15 2019 ; 363 ( 6432 ) doi: 10.1126/science.aau0964 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 21, 2024. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis Hanyujie Kang , Xueqing Gu , Siyu Cao , Zhaohui Tong , Nan Song bioRxiv 2024.02.16.580775; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.580775 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pulmonary macrophage subcluster in silicosis Hanyujie Kang , Xueqing Gu , Siyu Cao , Zhaohui Tong , Nan Song bioRxiv 2024.02.16.580775; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.580775 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Bioinformatics Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7644) Biochemistry (17728) Bioengineering (13917) Bioinformatics (42038) Biophysics (21489) Cancer Biology (18637) Cell Biology (25553) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13401) Ecology (19941) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24367) Genetics (15622) Genomics (22547) Immunology (17764) Microbiology (40475) Molecular Biology (17208) Neuroscience (88749) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2842) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4834) Physiology (7659) Plant Biology (15175) Scientific Communication and Education (2047) Synthetic Biology (4304) Systems Biology (9835) Zoology (2272)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00