Application of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Consensus for Adenomyosis Diagnosis
This study developed and validated an ultrasound scoring system using MUSA features, which significantly improved adenomyosis diagnosis accuracy and showed a modest correlation with dysmenorrhea severity.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic performance of nine MUSA-defined ultrasonographic features for adenomyosis and used ridge regression to build an ultrasound scoring system from these features, validating it on separate training and testing sets of patients who underwent total hysterectomy between May 2023 and December 2024. Interrupted junctional zone and myometrial cysts had the highest specificity (89.0% and 88.5%), while hyperechoic islands had the highest sensitivity (69.2%). The scoring system showed strong discrimination in the training set (AUC 0.948) and testing set (AUC 0.894), with no significant correlation between ultrasound score and preoperative hemoglobin, but a weak positive correlation with dysmenorrhea severity on VAS scores. The authors note a limitation inherent to the retrospective design and that the data are not publicly available. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — developing and validating a MUSA-based transvaginal ultrasound scoring system to diagnose adenomyosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,194 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-07-27T06:10:37.632021+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine