Application of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Consensus for Adenomyosis Diagnosis

other OA: bronze public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study developed and validated an ultrasound scoring system using MUSA features, which significantly improved adenomyosis diagnosis accuracy and showed a modest correlation with dysmenorrhea severity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic performance of nine MUSA-defined ultrasonographic features for adenomyosis and used ridge regression to build an ultrasound scoring system from these features, validating it on separate training and testing sets of patients who underwent total hysterectomy between May 2023 and December 2024. Interrupted junctional zone and myometrial cysts had the highest specificity (89.0% and 88.5%), while hyperechoic islands had the highest sensitivity (69.2%). The scoring system showed strong discrimination in the training set (AUC 0.948) and testing set (AUC 0.894), with no significant correlation between ultrasound score and preoperative hemoglobin, but a weak positive correlation with dysmenorrhea severity on VAS scores. The authors note a limitation inherent to the retrospective design and that the data are not publicly available. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — developing and validating a MUSA-based transvaginal ultrasound scoring system to diagnose adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of the nine Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA)-defined ultrasonographic features for adenomyosis and develop an ultrasound scoring system to improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed ultrasound images from patients who underwent total hysterectomy between May 2023 and December 2024, in accordance with the MUSA consensus. The cohort was split into training and testing sets. Ridge regression was applied to the training set to develop an ultrasound scoring system based on the regression coefficients of each sign, which was subsequently validated in the test set. Correlations between the ultrasound score and preoperative hemoglobin, dysmenorrhea were evaluated. RESULTS: Interrupted junctional zone and myometrial cysts showed highest specificity (89.0%, 88.5%), hyperechoic islands highest sensitivity (69.2%). In the training set, the scoring system achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI 0.901-0.990), sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 87.3%, accuracy 86.8%. In the testing set, AUC was 0.894 (95% CI 0.856-0.931), sensitivity 79.4%, specificity 83.9%, accuracy 81.7%. No significant correlation existed between ultrasound score and hemoglobin (ρ = 0.017, P = .824), but a weak positive correlation was found with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (ρ = 0.178, P = .016). CONCLUSION: All nine MUSA features contribute to adenomyosis diagnosis, but no single sign is sufficiently accurate alone. The ultrasound scoring system significantly enhances transvaginal ultrasound diagnostic performance and shows strong clinical potential. Higher scores correlate modestly with greater dysmenorrhea severity.
Full text 2,194 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of the nine Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA)-defined ultrasonographic features for adenomyosis and develop an ultrasound scoring system to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed ultrasound images from patients who underwent total hysterectomy between May 2023 and December 2024, in accordance with the MUSA consensus. The cohort was split into training and testing sets. Ridge regression was applied to the training set to develop an ultrasound scoring system based on the regression coefficients of each sign, which was subsequently validated in the test set. Correlations between the ultrasound score and preoperative hemoglobin, dysmenorrhea were evaluated.

Results

Interrupted junctional zone and myometrial cysts showed highest specificity (89.0%, 88.5%), hyperechoic islands highest sensitivity (69.2%). In the training set, the scoring system achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI 0.901–0.990), sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 87.3%, accuracy 86.8%. In the testing set, AUC was 0.894 (95% CI 0.856–0.931), sensitivity 79.4%, specificity 83.9%, accuracy 81.7%. No significant correlation existed between ultrasound score and hemoglobin (ρ = 0.017, P = .824), but a weak positive correlation was found with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores (ρ = 0.178, P = .016).

Conclusion

All nine MUSA features contribute to adenomyosis diagnosis, but no single sign is sufficiently accurate alone. The ultrasound scoring system significantly enhances transvaginal ultrasound diagnostic performance and shows strong clinical potential. Higher scores correlate modestly with greater dysmenorrhea severity. Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain MUSA

Condition tags

adenomyosisdysmenorrhea

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:10:37.632021+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine