Philosophers reinforce economists' support for UN climate targets, but disagree on why

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract The estimated value to society from climate change mitigation is highly sensitive to the long-term social discount rate (SDR). While it is not clear that they possess any special expertise on the ethics of intergenerational welfare, governmental discounting guidance has almost exclusively been influenced by economists. Our study, by contrast, reports the views of a disciplinary group of experts who are most trained in ethical matters; philosophers. We show that, as a group, these experts offer strong support for a real SDR of 2%; a value that is also predominantly backed by economists. We find multidisciplinary support for climate policy paths in line with the UN climate targets when views on discounting determinants are applied within a recent update of the DICE Integrated Assessment Model. However, this apparent agreement hides important differences in views on how the ethics of intergenerational welfare can be better incorporated into climate policy evaluation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0