scTimeBench: A streamlined benchmarking platform for single-cell time-series analysis

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,449 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Temporal modelling of single-cell gene expression is essential for capturing dynamic cellular processes, yet a systematic framework for evaluating time-aware trajectory inference methods has not yet been established. Here, we present a modular and scalable benchmark designed to assess methods across three critical tasks: forecast accuracy (temporal cell alignment) for projecting cells to unseen time points, embedding coherence between original and projected data, and cell-type lineage fidelity. We evaluated nine state-of-the-art methods, which are broadly categorized into 7 forecasting-based and 2 optimal transport (OT)-based methods across eight diverse datasets spanning four species. Our results show that while several methods achieve high forecast accuracy, they often fail to preserve biological signals, both in their latent spaces and in cell lineage reconstruction. Notably, most methods confer low lineage fidelity and often underperform compared to a correlation baseline. We further demonstrate that integrating pseudotime can effectively denoise trajectories by aligning the data snapshots with the intrinsic biological clock in each cell. Finally, to streamline benchmarking for temporal single-cell analysis, we built one of the first self-contained Python packages for the research community: https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/scTimeBench. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0