Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Process Automation: An eDSR Approach to Intelligent Data Validation in Financial Decisions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This Design Science Research (eDSR) preprint studies how to develop and evaluate design principles for integrating fuzzy logic algorithms into robotic process automation (RPA) to perform intelligent, compliant data validation in financial services using imperfect string matching. Using an echelon-based eDSR process (problem diagnosis, solution design, and demonstration/evaluation) conducted iteratively at a multinational IT corporation, the authors integrate Jaro-Winkler, Levenshtein, and N-gram algorithms within RPA and report a 67% reduction in false rejection rates while maintaining 97% accuracy. A stated limitation is that the work is presented as a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Over the past decade, automation of business processes has been evolving onto more advanced and intelligent solutions that go beyond basic capabilities of rule-based robotization. This paper presents a Design Science Research (DSR) study conducted to develop and evaluate design principles for integrating fuzzy logic algorithms with Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to address complex data validation challenges in financial services. Following the echelon-based Design Science Research (eDSR) methodology, we decompose the design process into three interconnected echelons: problem diagnosis, solution design, as well as demonstration and evaluation. Our research addresses the gap in prescriptive knowledge for designing intelligent automation systems that can handle imperfect data matching scenarios while maintaining accuracy and compliance standards. The iterative research process conducted at a multinational IT corporation, enabled us to develop design principles guiding the integration of Jaro-Winkler, Levenshtein, and N-gram algorithms within RPA, resulting in a solution that achieved a 67% reduction in false rejection rates while maintaining 97% accuracy in data validation processes. Our main contributions include: (1) prescriptive design knowledge for enhancing RPA with fuzzy logic capabilities, (2) validated design principles for balancing automation flexibility with risk management in financial contexts, and (3) empirical evidence implementing Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory at intelligent automation contexts. It provides actionable guidance for practitioners implementing AI-enhanced automation in complex, regulated environments.
Full text 10,980 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Process Automation: An eDSR Approach to Intelligent Data Validation in Financial Decisions | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Process Automation: An eDSR Approach to Intelligent Data Validation in Financial Decisions Damian Kedziora, Piotr Marciniak This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Over the past decade, automation of business processes has been evolving onto more advanced and intelligent solutions that go beyond basic capabilities of rule-based robotization. This paper presents a Design Science Research (DSR) study conducted to develop and evaluate design principles for integrating fuzzy logic algorithms with Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to address complex data validation challenges in financial services. Following the echelon-based Design Science Research (eDSR) methodology, we decompose the design process into three interconnected echelons: problem diagnosis, solution design, as well as demonstration and evaluation. Our research addresses the gap in prescriptive knowledge for designing intelligent automation systems that can handle imperfect data matching scenarios while maintaining accuracy and compliance standards. The iterative research process conducted at a multinational IT corporation, enabled us to develop design principles guiding the integration of Jaro-Winkler, Levenshtein, and N-gram algorithms within RPA, resulting in a solution that achieved a 67% reduction in false rejection rates while maintaining 97% accuracy in data validation processes. Our main contributions include: ( 1 ) prescriptive design knowledge for enhancing RPA with fuzzy logic capabilities, ( 2 ) validated design principles for balancing automation flexibility with risk management in financial contexts, and ( 3 ) empirical evidence implementing Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory at intelligent automation contexts. It provides actionable guidance for practitioners implementing AI-enhanced automation in complex, regulated environments. Intelligent Automation Fuzzy Logic Design Science Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7206919","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":492512358,"identity":"876b7e03-0aa3-4bca-88f6-024f67efe5bd","order_by":0,"name":"Damian Kedziora","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Lappeenranta University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Damian","middleName":"","lastName":"Kedziora","suffix":""},{"id":492512359,"identity":"0a8dc38f-1893-4a73-87ae-953c8051f1e5","order_by":1,"name":"Piotr Marciniak","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Lodz University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Piotr","middleName":"","lastName":"Marciniak","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-07-24 15:08:24","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":94489396,"identity":"428195bf-7970-44f4-b1e3-af0c26d871af","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-27 17:04:30","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":535617,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7206919/v1_covered_c5533135-8c61-499a-b714-1d4e41fd0a2c.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Process Automation: An eDSR Approach to Intelligent Data Validation in Financial Decisions","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Intelligent, Automation, Fuzzy, Logic, Design, Science","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOver the past decade, automation of business processes has been evolving onto more advanced and intelligent solutions that go beyond basic capabilities of rule-based robotization. This paper presents a Design Science Research (DSR) study conducted to develop and evaluate design principles for integrating fuzzy logic algorithms with Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to address complex data validation challenges in financial services. Following the echelon-based Design Science Research (eDSR) methodology, we decompose the design process into three interconnected echelons: problem diagnosis, solution design, as well as demonstration and evaluation. Our research addresses the gap in prescriptive knowledge for designing intelligent automation systems that can handle imperfect data matching scenarios while maintaining accuracy and compliance standards. The iterative research process conducted at a multinational IT corporation, enabled us to develop design principles guiding the integration of Jaro-Winkler, Levenshtein, and N-gram algorithms within RPA, resulting in a solution that achieved a 67% reduction in false rejection rates while maintaining 97% accuracy in data validation processes. Our main contributions include: (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) prescriptive design knowledge for enhancing RPA with fuzzy logic capabilities, (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) validated design principles for balancing automation flexibility with risk management in financial contexts, and (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) empirical evidence implementing Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory at intelligent automation contexts. It provides actionable guidance for practitioners implementing AI-enhanced automation in complex, regulated environments.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Design Principles for AI-Enhanced Process Automation: An eDSR Approach to Intelligent Data Validation in Financial Decisions","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-31 14:53:53","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7206919/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"10d293e6-564a-4e89-86b5-b65560e462ca","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 31st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-10-27T14:44:00+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-31 14:53:53","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7206919","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7206919","identity":"rs-7206919","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0