Community assembly explains invasion differences between two contrasting forest types

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Plant communities within a metacommunity can vary widely in their degree of invasion by introduced species. Disturbance, propagule pressure, and biotic resistance are common explanations for this variation, but empirical evidence for these hypotheses is mixed. Alternatively, the community assembly framework predicts that local assembly filters determine both native and exotic composition, but lower trait variation in the introduced species pool may exclude them from certain sites. We examined evidence for this framework using observational data from forests and woodlands of Long Island, NY, USA. These forests vary in vegetation composition and invasion along a soil gradient. They are also highly disturbed and fragmented, yet some stands have almost no introduced plants. Using data collected in 1998 and 2021-22, we quantified relationships between community composition, soil characteristics, and functional traits for native and exotic assemblages, as indicators of environmental filtering. We found similar trait-environment relationships in native and introduced species, suggesting that both groups follow the same local assembly rules. Introduced species were predominantly found in sites with more nutrient-rich soils and were absent from sites with nutrient-poor soils. At the regional scale, the exotic species pool was biased toward trait values favored in more nutrient-rich environments, particularly high growth rates and low leaf C:N ratios, which explains their absence from nutrient-poor environments. These patterns were consistent over time, and stands that were uninvaded in 1998 remained so in 2021-22, supporting the robustness and reliability of short-term studies. This study shows that invasion patterns in plant communities can be explained by the assembly rules that govern native species. By linking local environmental filtering with regional species pool characteristics, this work advances our understanding of how some communities remain uninvaded despite high disturbance and propagule pressure. Overall, these results highlight the utility of the community assembly framework, and emphasize the importance of regional processes in constraining the local distribution of introduced species.
Full text 2,319 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Plant communities within a metacommunity can vary widely in their degree of invasion by introduced species. Disturbance, propagule pressure, and biotic resistance are common explanations for this variation, but empirical evidence for these hypotheses is mixed. Alternatively, the community assembly framework predicts that local assembly filters determine both native and exotic composition, but lower trait variation in the introduced species pool may exclude them from certain sites. We examined evidence for this framework using observational data from forests and woodlands of Long Island, NY, USA. These forests vary in vegetation composition and invasion along a soil gradient. They are also highly disturbed and fragmented, yet some stands have almost no introduced plants. Using data collected in 1998 and 2021-22, we quantified relationships between community composition, soil characteristics, and functional traits for native and exotic assemblages, as indicators of environmental filtering. We found similar trait-environment relationships in native and introduced species, suggesting that both groups follow the same local assembly rules. Introduced species were predominantly found in sites with more nutrient-rich soils and were absent from sites with nutrient-poor soils. At the regional scale, the exotic species pool was biased toward trait values favored in more nutrient-rich environments, particularly high growth rates and low leaf C:N ratios, which explains their absence from nutrient-poor environments. These patterns were consistent over time, and stands that were uninvaded in 1998 remained so in 2021-22, supporting the robustness and reliability of short-term studies. This study shows that invasion patterns in plant communities can be explained by the assembly rules that govern native species. By linking local environmental filtering with regional species pool characteristics, this work advances our understanding of how some communities remain uninvaded despite high disturbance and propagule pressure. Overall, these results highlight the utility of the community assembly framework, and emphasize the importance of regional processes in constraining the local distribution of introduced species. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00