Cross-racial Consistency of Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Forms: Comparisons Between Turkish and Japanese Populations

Cross-racial Consistency of Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Forms: Comparisons Between Turkish and Japanese Populations | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Cross-racial Consistency of Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Forms: Comparisons Between Turkish and Japanese Populations Chihiro Tanikawa, M Okan Akcam, Hatice Gokalp, Edlira Zere, Kenji Takada This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 Aug, 2021 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Facial features may reflect an individual’s probability of survival because of natural selection—for example, through reproduction and feeding abilities. However, questions remain about which facial characteristics contribute to facial masculinity and/or femininity across races. Given that sexual dimorphism stems from the common natural selection process, it is hypothesized that there is cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism of facial forms. Examining the extent to which sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations are similar across diverse populations could suggest the source of the indirect evolutionary benefits of facial sexual dimorphism traits. To explore this idea, we selected two geographically distinct races. Three-dimensional model faces were derived from 272 Turkish and Japanese men and women; their facial morphologies were evaluated using landmark and surface-based analyses. We found four common facial features related to sexual dimorphism. Both Turkish and Japanese females had a shorter lower face height, a flatter forehead, greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when compared with their male counterparts. We also discussed the possible phylogenetic contribution of masticatory organ function and morphogenesis on sexual dimorphism of the human face. Anthropology Sexual dimorphism Cross-racial consistency Masticatory organ Human face 3D Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction Sexual dimorphism (i.e., phenotypic differences between males and females) is thought to arise from both sexual and natural selection 1 . Thus, it is assumed that sexual dimorphism in facial characteristics (i.e., face masculinity and femininity) of people in the modern age is speculated to reflect the evolutionary outcome of directional selection and signal indirect genetic benefits that may maximize an individual’s chances for reproduction and survival 1,2 . Consequently, several psychological studies previously tried to explore universally preferred facial characteristics related to attractiveness 2,3 to elucidate the evolutionary origin of facial sexual dimorphism. One study 4 revealed that certain facial forms are universally preferred in sexual selection; a woman’s attractiveness is related to higher and wider eyes, greater distance between the eyes, and a smaller chin, whereas a man’s attractiveness is related to large eyes, prominent cheekbones, and a large chin. Furthermore, two-dimensional mathematically modeled and accentuated face masculinity and femininity was related to attractiveness 2 , and these judgments were similar across different cultural backgrounds. Those studies tested the hypothesis that universal facial attractiveness itself is strongly driven by sexual selection, and the existence of cross-cultural consistency in attractiveness regarding face masculinity and femininity supports this hypothesis. However, the evolutionary origin of facial morphology under natural selection has not been as extensively discussed in hominids. In animals, natural and sexual selection tend to act antagonistically on male sexual traits, such as in the case of the peacock’s tail 1 . Some studies on animals inferred that environmental adaptation may cause phenotypic variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism among populations when there is a trade-off between natural and sexual selection 5,6 . Theoretically, however, sexual and natural selection may not act antagonistically on some sexual traits. For example, recent research on chameleons showed that natural and sexual selection interact in complex ways, and produce morphological variation in bite force 3 ; this finding indicates that there are some facial traits that can attract the opposite sex and also enhance individual survival probability to different degrees between male and female hominids. It is assumed that those traits would be strongly expressed as phenotypic differences between males and females, and would show lesser variations in the human race. Thus, we hypothesized that examining common facial characteristics among populations and those specific to each population will help elucidate trends in hominin facial evolution. In addition to facial shape sexual dimorphism, sexual size dimorphism is also a widespread phenomenon among animals 1 . The occurrence of sexual size dimorphism has historically been explained by male-to-male competition 7 . Among anthropoid primates, the sexual dimorphism in canine tooth size is an obvious dimorphism along with the body size sexual dimorphism 8 . Due to the existence of this sexual dimorphism in dentition, traditionally, the hypothesis that male/female differences in size are related to male/female dietary differences has been considered. For example, a research examining the relationship of sexual dimorphism in dentition and body size showed that within the suborder Anthropoidea, there is a positive correlation between the degree of sexual dimorphism in body size and the degree of sexual dimorphism in canine size 9 . However, with the evidence of numerous exceptions to this, there is no conclusive simple rule that relates the body size dimorphism to tooth size dimorphism 9 . Generally, it can still be stated that an individual’s ability to intake proper amounts of food with a healthy chewing apparatus is a prerequisite for natural selection in both sexes. Even today, men require more calories than women to sustain a healthy weight 10 . The greater maximum molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness of men 11 may be related to their need for more calories compared with the corresponding need of women. Additionally, masticatory muscle size has a major impact on cranial structure 12 . Therefore, from a phylogenetic perspective, it is reasonable to assume that a well-developed masticatory apparatus in males is associated with the expression of facial sexual dimorphism with respect to both size and shape. However, our understanding of this subject has been limited, because few studies previously investigated the impact of the masticatory apparatus and muscle function on facial sexual dimorphism in Homo sapiens. Several researchers have discussed the hominid evolution and diets 13,14 . In order to resist the stress caused by frequently chewing tough foods, species that eat tougher food tend to have a thicker lower body of the jaw and mandibular joint 14 . The mandibular symphysis is placed relatively higher in order to increase the momentum of the masticatory muscles or to perform a more uniform occlusion in the entire cheek teeth 13 . With modern data related to different human races, sexual dimorphism of craniofacial hard tissue was previously analyzed in several researches to explore human evolution 14 . This was because craniofacial hard tissue was considered to reflect population history and sexual dimorphism to varying degrees. A recent study of the zygomatic bone shape was extracted from the computer tomography data of 98 Chinese and 96 Germans; it was found that population-related shape differences were captured primarily and sexual dimorphism were less distinct compared with the population differences 15 . Another study 16 examined a sample of modern human crania (n = 281) designed to represent modern human geographic variations, as well as diverse subsistence activities, that can be subdivided into 14 main regional/genetic groups; they reported that robusticity of the cranial shape between males and females, was consistently different in different populations. Other researchers 17 also studied cranial traits among different populations of modern African American, European American, and English groups; they observed greater variations in the sexual dimorphism of cranial traits. A separate study that evaluated the shape of the chin, among specimens of nine geographic regions, showed that sex differences were not geographically universal 18 . Consequently, cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism of hard tissue remains controversial. Sexual dimorphism of craniofacial soft tissue has also been studied. A previous study compared facial morphologies in two European Caucasian populations from the UK and Netherlands, and found that females had greater ethnic differences compared with males, which indicates non-universal sexual dimorphism 19 . A more recent study on two cross-sectional cohorts of children from Tanzania and the United States showed, through principal component analysis (PCA) and multifactor analysis of variance (MANOVA), that both allometric trajectories and sexual dimorphism were detectable in this large sample, but were actually very similar in the two populations 20 . Although these studies described overall variation between the analyzed samples, detailed common sexually dimorphic characteristics among populations have not yet been described. Few studies have examined common facial characteristics among populations and those specific to each population in a quantitative manner to reveal the evolutionary origin of these traits, and discussed the biological importance of oral and facial functions (including masticatory functions) in the evolution of each facial characteristics. In this study, we examined if there is cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism that may help elucidate the importance of the masticatory organs based on three-dimensional (3D) facial surface configurations. Comparing sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations among different populations can provide insight into the evolutionary origin of facial sexual dimorphism. Briefly, because common characteristics between geographically distinct populations are thought to result from common evolutionary forces across populations, detecting possible relationships between these facial characteristics and the masticatory apparatus could strengthen our understanding of the importance of the masticatory apparatus or muscle function in the evolution of facial sexual dimorphism. Therefore, we analyzed sexual dimorphism in Turkish and Japanese populations, which are geographically distinct and have white and Asian origins, respectively 21 . In our study 22 , we determined a new set of variables that were effective for characterizing the differences in 3D facial surface configurations between males and females in the Japanese population. The study revealed site specificity and strength or intensity of sexual dimorphism with regard to facial soft tissue. The hypothesis of our research is that there is a cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphic faces and its common characteristics can be explained by the masticatory functions. The objectives of the present study were: To investigate whether the phenotypes that designate sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations differ between Japanese and Turkish populations or if they exhibit common features of sex difference To infer possible reasons that account for the observed commonality and dissimilarity from a biological aspect, especially with regard to the phylogenetic importance of the chewing apparatus. Results Averaged faces and accentuated averaged faces Figure 1 depicts the averaged and accentuated averaged faces that were computed for the male and female Turkish and Japanese subjects. The faces with enhanced masculinity and femininity that were mathematically calculated based on the data employed in this study clearly revealed that female faces differed from male faces in 3D. In general, facial differences associated with sex in both ethnic groups were similar: females had a shorter face height, especially in the lower third of the face; a flatter forehead; and more rounded cheeks with a greater naso-labial fold. Surface-based analysis Figure 2 shows significance probability maps and actual differences of the X-, Y-, and Z-values, and Supplementary Fig S1 represents mean vectors from male to female subgroups in each group. X-value (transverse direction). The most significant differences in the x-axis were observed in the nasal alar and chin in both ethnic groups. Both ethnic groups showed a smaller nasal alar width and smaller chin width when normalized by the distance between right and left exocanthions (P<0.05). In the Turkish group, there were differences with respect to the left corner of the mouth, but not the right corner, on the X-axis; this meant that Turkish males had more laterally positioned corner of the mouth on the left side than the Turkish females. Y-value (vertical direction). The significance probability maps clearly showed that differences associated with sex were most prominent in the Y-axis among the three dimensions, especially in the Japanese group. The areas that showed significant differences were widely distributed along the lower faces; remarkable upward displacement was observed for the female subgroups, and this was consistent in both ethnic groups. This characteristic led to an apparent decrease in the vertical height of the lower facial height in the female subgroups. Furthermore, the supraorbital ridges also showed downward displacement in the male compared with female subgroups of both ethnic groups, which indicates that the male subjects had greatly sloped supraorbital ridges and female subjects had flatter foreheads in both ethnic groups. In contrast, upward displacement of the subnasal region and the nasal tip in the female compared with male subgroup was only observed in the Japanese group; this trait is a sexually dimorphic phenotypic characteristic that was unique to the Japanese subjects. Moreover, greater upward displacement of the cheeks in the female subgroup was also only observed in the Japanese subjects. The nasal dorsum showed greater upward displacement in the Turkish male subgroup, which indicates a greater naso-frontal angle and greater nasal hump (P<0.05); this characteristic was unique to the Turkish subjects. Z-axis (antero-posterior direction). Z-value comparison showed the most consistent results between the two ethnic groups. Both ethnic groups had more protuberant cheeks in the female than in the male subjects. Additionally, females of both ethnic groups had more retruded subnasal regions than males, and males of both ethnic groups had significantly more protuberant nasal tips than females. The upper and lower lips were more retruded in the Japanese female group compared with the Japanese male group (P<0.05), and this characteristic was unique to the Japanese population. Variance of each population and each sex, and their interactions The first three significant principal components, which explained 66.2% of the sample’s variance, were determined to be significant by scree plot analysis. As the first three eigenvalues of a population covariance matrix were large enough compared to the others, PCA was considered to be appropriate for dimensional reduction of the present high dimensional data that exceeds the observation numbers 23 . Visualization of the between-group structure of the surface data (Figs 3, 4) revealed a distinct separation between populations and, to a lesser extent, a noticeable expression of sexual dimorphism (second principal component). Mahalanobis distances between the two ethnic groups were 32.2 and 30.4 for the male and female subgroups, respectively. In contrast, Mahalanobis distances between the sex subgroups were 1.4 and 1.6 in the Japanese and Turkish groups, respectively (Supplementary Fig S2). These results indicate that the geographic variation in facial morphology was greater relative to within population variation related to sex. Sex and population affinity were highly significant P<0.01, Table 1), but there was no significant interaction of these two factors (P=0.88). Sectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis The results of the sectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis are shown in Supplementary Tables S1, S2, and S3, and summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Text S1. Briefly, both Turkish and Japanese females had (1) a shorter lower face height, (2) a flatter forehead, (3) greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and (4) an antero-posteriorly smaller nose, with a greater retrusion of the subnasal region when compared with their male counterparts. The following phenotypic characteristics of sexual dimorphism were racially unique: Turkish females had greater vertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows, greater zygomatic width, and a shallower labio-mental sulcus; Japanese females had greater eye height, a flatter nose, a more superiorly positioned mouth, and reduced horizontal mandibular width (P0.8). These results were consistent with those of the surface-based analyses. Discussion In the present study, principal components that explained 66.2% of the sample’s variance showed interaction between population affinity and sex were not significant, which indicates that both populations have statistically similar expressions of sexual dimorphism. Alternatively, our detailed analysis revealed that both cross-racial characteristics of facial sexual dimorphism that were common to both the Japanese and Turkish subjects, and some characteristics that were unique to each set of subjects. The presence of both similarities and differences in facial sexual dimorphism among races described in this study were consistent with previous controversial studies regarding cross-racial consistency 15–18 20 . The common characteristics could have arisen from a strong selective force on fundamental function to survive as a result of natural selection, and the differing sexually dimorphic characteristics could be due to environmental adaptation under a trade-off between natural and sexual selection 5 . Regarding the common sexual dimorphic characteristics, both the Japanese and Turkish females had a shorter face height, especially with regard to the lower face; a flatter forehead; greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region; and less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region. Furthermore, females in both ethnic groups had antero-posteriorly smaller noses and greater retrusion of the columella base and subnasal region. Females had a shorter lower anterior face height, especially with regard to the chin, in both ethnic groups. It should be noted that a previous cephalometric study 24 documented temporal changes in the ratios of the anterior lower face height to the total face height in the Japanese population. Females exhibited the anterior lower face height to total face height ratio almost equal to or longer than males at 6, 8, and 10 years old. Females at 6, 10, and 14 years old had lower face height ratios that were similar to those of adults (6 years old = 54.6% and adults = 54.9%). It is after 12 years of age when males begin to have increased face height ratio 24 . The observed increase in the lower anterior face height in males can be ascribed to sexual differences in pubertal growth potential of the mandible 24 , which is prolonged in males compared with females. There are several explanations regarding why men have a greater lower anterior face height, especially in the chin after pubertal growth. From the perspective of mastication, it seems likely that the acquired basic skill for most fundamental motor performance, such as mastication and locomotion, is independent of sex 25 . A previous study 26 documented that the smoothness or skillfulness of masticatory jaw movement in terms of minimizing the jerk cost is not sex-specific. It should, however, also be noted that some parameters, such as the amount of jaw opening and movement velocity, are sensitive to sex-specific differences in jaw size and masticatory muscle properties 26 . Adult females show longer duration and lower peak velocity in masticatory jaw movement compared with males 25 ; this can be ascribed to adult males generating greater muscle force and faster muscle contraction 27 with greater muscle volume and size of the mandible, to which the jaw-closing muscles are attached. Sex influences on maximal molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness 11 . Thus, the anatomy and function of the masticatory muscles may contribute to explaining why females generally have smaller faces, especially in the lower third. From a biological perspective, sex hormones are major factors related to sexual dimorphism. In males, higher androgen serum levels at puberty exert potent osteoanabolic effects and therefore may contribute to this skeletal sexual dimorphism. Animal experiments with anabolic steroids demonstrated a clear effect on craniofacial growth, mainly as an increase in total skull length and increase in the depth of the antegonial notch 28 . Interestingly, a previous study showed that mandibular and cortical human osteoblastic cells of both sexes expressed higher androgen receptor mRNA levels and significantly more androgen binding sites per cell, and exhibited significantly greater mitogenic responses to the androgen dihydrotestosterone 29 . Those results indicate that the vertically greater mandibular height in males observed in our study could be due to skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in the mandible. Additionally, a previous study that examined facial morphology of 1-year-old boys and girls showed the existence of early sexual dimorphism, and prenatal testosterone exposure is thought to be related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology 30 . Thus, it is possible that androgens in males could contribute to facial sexual dimorphism both before and after puberty. Previous studies on anthropoids revealed only smaller muscle strains in the supraorbital region in contrast to those in the infraorbital region or the zygomatic arch during mastication 31,32 . Animal studies 33,34 have also revealed that circumorbital structures became greater to provide rigidity against non-masticatory forces; these studies revealed that is unlikely that masticatory muscle forces contributed to the remodeling of the supraorbital torus. On the contrary, the development of the supraorbital ridge has been viewed as an ontogenetic adaptation to masticatory forces 35 . In primates, masticatory-stress models have been examined using in vivo experimental data. Primates have significant temporalis attachments that extend to almost the midline of the frontal bones; bending of the brow-ridges is thought to be due to the mastication force pushing upward and the masseter and temporalis muscles pulling downward 36 . Few of the previous computational models, using finite element analysis of primate skulls 37 , agree with these in vivo findings. A previous study 38 found a positive correlation between the mesio-distal crown width of the mandibular first molar and the size of the supraorbital ridge in humans. Occlusal forces exerted on the molar teeth contribute to supraorbital torus formation. Because females generate weaker muscle force and slower muscle contraction than males 27 , and exhibit decreased maximal molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness 11 , we should not rule out the possibility of contribution of masticatory muscle forces to supraorbital ridge formation in humans. Phylogenetically, the smaller supraorbital ridge observed in the female subjects in the present study may be explained by the differences in masticatory force magnitude and its relevant jaw muscle thickness between males and females 11,31 . In the present study, both Japanese and Turkish females showed an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when the eye distances were standardized. This result is in line with those of previous studies 39–41 . Previous studies primarily hypothesized that males have evolved to have greater nasal cavity dimensions to facilitate the oxygen intake that is needed to maintain a larger body mass 38,42 . The degree of sexual dimorphism in nasal shape is considered to be potentially due to the functional integration between the nasal cavity and the respiratory system 43 . The extent of the cheek region is defined as “superiorly to the zygomatic arch, inferiorly to the margin of the mandible, posteriorly to the ear, and anteriorly to the corner of the mouth” and is divided into four parts as topographical regions: infra-orbital, buccal, zygomatic, and parotid–masseteric regions 44 ). In the present study, in the infraorbital and buccal regions, the sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region was greater in the female subjects on the left side. Furthermore, lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid–masseteric region was also observed in both Japanese and Turkish female subjects. A lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid–masseteric region can be explained by the smaller masseter muscles in women 11 . Thin masseter muscles lead to a lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid–masseteric region in women. Effects of developmental and functional interactions on morphological variability of the head through ontogeny have been discussed in previous studies 43,45 . Several studies 43,45 have claimed that genetic signals determine the initial geometry of craniofacial anatomy, and that geometry is altered by the local mechanical environment, such as masticatory function and respiratory function, through variations in the spatio-temporal interplay of depository and resorptive activity of bone. In contrast, there is very little concrete evidence of the relationship between functional and phylogenetic development in facial configurations. In general, it is assumed that varying environmental conditions, such as climates, geographic areas, and dietary resources, require physical characteristics, including dento-facial features, which contribute to maximizing the survival probability of individuals. Hominids are now recognized as showing higher adaptability to their surrounding environment based on related morphological changes than was previously understood. In the past, several researches have addressed 3D morphological differences between populations. For example, between Caucasians and African-Americans, the most distinct differences were observed in the forehead, alar base, and perioricular regions using 3D facial data 46 ; between Caucasians and Asians, differences were observed in the malar and zygomatic areas, forehead, lips, and chin 47 . Even in the phylogenetically related populations, there were differences seen in the nasal, malar, lips, and lower facial regions between two population groups (Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Tex) 48 ; differences were also observed in the nasal width, eye distances, and facial height of two European Caucasian populations of close phylogenetic and geographic proximity (UK and Netherlands) 19 . In short, the previous studies described the facial differences between the population groups; however, limited data has been reported regarding varied facial sexual dimorphic characteristics among populations. In the present study, four features in the Japanese and three in the Turkish were found to be exclusive sexual dimorphic characteristics. In the Japanese subjects, females had greater eye height (i.e., brighter eyes) compared with males. A medium or high upper eyelid crease is known to represent an attractive face in East Asian females, and 50% of females exhibit a minimal or absence of a double eyelid 45 . Although greater eye height is also deemed an important factor for facial attractiveness in other racial or ethnic groups, the present results indicate that eye height is a visible facial sexual dimorphism that is more discriminatory in the Japanese subjects than the Turkish subjects. Japanese females also showed a smaller anteroposterior protrusion of the nasal dorsum at the orbital level (i.e., a flatter nose) and a superiorly positioned mouth with a vertically shorter subnasal region. Additionally, shorter horizontal mandibular width was observed in the Japanese females. These findings indicate that Japanese females had overall smaller middle and lower facial structures than males. In a previous study that examined the 3D nasal shape and genotype in 3,746 individuals, nares width was correlated with temperature and absolute humidity 49 . This result indicates that at least sexual dimorphism in nasal shape may change because of climate adaptation. In contrast to the Japanese females, three features were found to be characteristic of the Turkish females compared with Turkish males. There was a greater vertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows, and an increased zygomatic width compared with exocanthion–exocanthion distance. These traits reflect a stout upper facial structure. Facial ontogeny research on immature hominids with a finite element model 50 showed that bone deposition was identified over the outer aspects of the orbits, lateral nasal walls, infraorbital region, zygomatico-maxillary region, parts of the mid-clivus, including the canine jugum, and interincisal protuberance, as well as portions of the nasal sill and areas lateral to the intermaxillary suture; they inferred that these changes were related to the masticatory system 50 . A shallower labio-mental sulcus also characterized Turkish female compared with male faces. A recent study 51 indicated that an ontogenetic decrease in chin prominence was associated with increased vertical bending resistance and vice versa. Thus, it can be inferred that a shallow labiomental sulcus was unique to the current Turkish female participants, which indicates an adaptational response of Turkish females, who have delicately constituted jaw bones and muscles, compared with Turkish males in a dietary environment that includes tougher animal proteins compared with the Japanese dietary environment. It is well known that Africa is the ancestral homeland of modern humans 52 . A phylogenetic tree showed the categorization of the world population into nine sub-populations based on the polymorphisms of protein genes of 1,915 populations: African; North African and West Asian; European; Amerind; Arctic Northeast Asian; Northeast Asian; Southeast Asian; Pacific Islander; and New Guinean and Australian 53 . The genetic distances between Japanese (Northeast Asian) and Turkish (European) were moderately far (55% of total distance) whereas European and North African were close (7%); this indicated that Japanese and Turkish (European) had different developmental route 53 . Genetic data also provided some indication that the spread of humans into Asia was along the coast to south and south-east Asia, from where it bifurcated to the north and south 54 . Thus, our comparisons of sexual dimorphism in facial forms between Turkish and Japanese populations can explain a relatively long span of genetic drift, which is the result of population variation among individual genotypes in their probabilities of survival and/or reproduction. Although the present study does not provide a convincing explanation about whether the sexual dimorphisms, which were determined in the present study to be unique to each racial group, represent consequences of natural selection for ethnicities that successfully adapted to dietary environments for many generations. Therefore, although we must be cautious about the limitations of interpreting these data, the results of the present study further enhance our understanding of human sexual dimorphism expressed in the oral and facial regions. Conclusions We found four facial features representing sexual dimorphism that are common to both ethnic groups. Both Turkish and Japanese females had (1) a shorter lower face height, (2) a flatter forehead, (3) greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and (4) an antero-posteriorly smaller nose, with a greater retrusion of the subnasal region when compared with their male counterparts. These results provided implications for the potential contribution of chewing apparatus in adaptation. Material And Methods Subjects A total of 272 subjects, which included 72 Turkish (Turkish group; females = 36 [Turkish female subgroup]; male = 36 [Turkish male subgroup]) and 200 Japanese (females = 100 [Japanese female subgroup], males = 100 [Japanese male subgroup]) aged between 18 and 35 years, were recruited from among the students and faculty of Ankara University in Turkey and Osaka University in Japan who met the following selection criteria: no congenital facial deformities including cleft lip or palate, no facial paralysis, no noticeable scars or skin disease in the neck or dentofacial regions (or history thereof), no history of any psychiatric disorder, no subjectively or objectively discernible jaw dysfunction, a body mass index [BMI] that ranged from 18.50 to 24.99, a dental overbite that ranged from 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm, a dental overjet that ranged from 0.0 mm to 7.0 mm, and a straight soft-tissue facial profile. For the present Japanese group, we used the samples from our previous study 22 . Due to recording limitations with 3-D digital cameras, male subjects having thick beards were excluded in advance. A written informed consent form was distributed to and signed by all participants. Informed consent was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Osaka University Dental Hospital (project ID: H25-E37-1) and the Ethics Committee, Ankara University (project ID: 36290600/S5). Data acquisition The participants were asked to sit on a fixed chair with a natural head position without head support. They were then asked to assume a resting posture, which was defined as a relaxed facial posture with the lips in repose and the teeth in light contact in the habitual maximum intercuspation position. Each subject’s face was recorded once with a 3-D digital camera (3dMDcranial System, 3dMD, Atlanta, GA, USA) with a 1.5-millisecond capture speed and a dimensional accuracy of 0.2 mm 22 . Each 3D facial image, scaled down to 75% of its actual size, was displayed on a 17-in LCD monitor (1701FP, Dell, Inc., Round Rock, TX, USA). The positions of 10 single and 8 paired landmarks (glabella [Gla], nasion [N], exocanthion [Ex], endocanthion [En], palpebrale superius [Ps], palpebrale inferius [Pi], porion [Po], orbitale [Or], pronasale [Prn], alar curvature point [Ac], subnasale [Sn], labiale superius [Ls], stomion [Sto], cheilion [Ch], labiale inferius [Li], submentale [Sm], pogonion [Pog], gnathion [Gn] (Supplementary Table S4, Supplementary Fig S3) were identified by visual inspection of the image and digitized using a computer mouse cursor and commercial software (Face Rugle, Medic Engineering Co., Kyoto, Japan). The zygomaticus′ [Zy′] and gonion′ [Go′] were mathematically defined as the most lateral point of the mathematically defined facial outline and the most inferior and lateral point of the mandibular facial outline, respectively, where the facial outline was defined as a series of the points with 60° angles between the surface normal vectors and Z-axis 22 . The process was repeated twice for each image, and the landmark coordinates from the two digitizations produced were averaged to yield the final landmark coordinates. A previous study 22 that investigated the intra-observer reliability confirmed a mean absolute landmark difference of 0.32 mm (range, 0.07 mm to 0.52 mm) between the repeated measures (Supplementary Text S2). This result falls into the range considered reliable to highly reliable 55 . A 3D coordinate system identical to that employed in our previous study (Supplementary Fig S3; Informed consent was obtained to publish this image in an online open-access publication.) 56 was used in the current study. In short, the sagittal plane was defined by the exocanthions and endocanthions, and the axial plane was defined by the exocanthions, porion, and subnasale. The nasion was set as the origin. Analyses The 3D soft tissue facial morphology was evaluated by the two kinds of analysis: surface- and sectional-line-and-landmark-based analyses 22,57 , which are summarized below. (1) Surface-based analysis The morphology of the facial surface was analyzed using the method documented in our previous study 22,57 . Homogeneous modeling. For each facial surface, fitting of high-resolution template meshes or a generic model 57,58 was performed using commercial software (HBM-Rugle, Medic Engineering Co., Kyoto) based on the landmarks assigned to each 3D image. This method automatically generated a homogeneous model that consisted of 6,017 points (i.e., fitted mesh or semi-landmark nodes) on the wire mesh for each model with landmark anchors (i.e., Ex, En, Ps, Pi, Prn, Ac, Sn, Ls, Sto, Ch, Li, Sm, and Pog). This technique permits the extraction of relevant surface anatomy from face data while removing and/or smoothing out non-relevant data, yielding high-resolution, 3D surface data that provide enough detail to facilitate a quantitative assessment while maintaining small file sizes that are easily manipulatable and portable to a range of visualization technologies 57,58 (Fig 5; Informed consent was obtained to publish this image in an online open-access publication.). The arithmetic means of the coordinate values of each corresponding point on the wire mesh were computed and used to generate the averaged 3D facial images for each male and female subgroup in each ethnic group. The surface displacement was quantitatively evaluated in each X-, Y-, and Z-axis in two different ways. The actual displacement vectors (male to female) and significance of differences were calculated for the 6,017 points on each mesh between the male and female subgroups in each ethnic group. The calculated vectors in millimeters were visualized with color-coding. Thereafter, the arithmetic means of the coordinate values of each corresponding point on the wire mesh were statistically analyzed for significant differences between the male and female subgroups using a two-sample t-test. A significance probability map 22,57 of the X-, Y-, and Z-values was generated to visualize these significant differences (Fig 6). Because previous studies revealed that masticatory muscle function likely influences mandible morphology (mainly in the vertical direction) 57 and inter-ocular width is less affected by masticatory muscle function 59 , the eyes, which are horizontally separated paired landmarks, were considered candidates for size normalization. A previous study 37 also showed that the right and left exocanthions were reliable points for identification. Thus, in the present study, facial size differences between individuals were standardized by normalizing the values of all surface coordinates to the distance between right and left exocanthions. Sexual dimorphism of accentuated images . To quantitatively infer facial form femininity and masculinity, accentuated averaged faces, and were calculated for the male and female subgroups, respectively, to highlight site-specific sexual dimorphism 22,57 , where and and are the arithmetic means of the coordinate values for the male subgroup, female subgroup, and the sum of both groups, respectively, and w is the arbitrary weight value. E xamination of the variance of each population and each sex , and their interactions . To examine the variance in each population and each sex, and their interactions, we first reduced dimensionality by performing PCA for the 6,017 coordinates of the aforementioned surface model 60 . The significant principal components were determined by scree plot analysis. Significant principal components were entered into a MANOVA to test for significance of the factors population affinity and sex. After MANOVA, a dendrogram was computed by applying the single linkage method to the matrix of Mahalanobis distances between subgroup means. (2) Sectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis To analyze the surface data in detail, five categories of curving lines were extracted from the 3D images (Supplementary Table S5). The curving lines were used to extract 142 measurements that were previously reported (see Supplementary Figs S4, S5, and S6 for definitions of those variables) 23 . In addition, 28 inter-landmark distances and 15 ratios that were previously reported 22 were determined and employed. Therefore, 185 variables were employed in total. Facial size differences between individuals were also standardized by normalizing the values of all linear variables to the distance between right and left exocanthions. A t -test was performed to determine whether the mean of each variable significantly differed between the Turkish male and female subgroups. To examine the similarity and dissimilarities of facial forms between the Japanese and Turkish groups, we included the sexual dimorphism results from a Japanese group reported in our previous study 22 . The effect size was calculated for each variable. Values greater than 0.8 for Cohen’s d were considered to have a large effect. Variables that showed significant differences and had large effects were considered biologically significant. Significance level was set to 0.01 due to a power analysis with a power of 0.8. Declarations Data availability The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Conflict of Interest Statement All author's declare no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 22792048 and 25862008) and Osaka University. We thank Ms. Rukiye Gocer and Dr. Yuri Ohnishi for their help, support and suggestions. Author contributions C.T. and K.T. conceived the study and were in charge of overall direction and planning. C.T. designed the model and the computational framework and analyzed the data. C.T., O.A., H.G., and E.Z. carried out the data acquisition. C.T. and E.Z. performed the calculations. C.T. and K.T. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. References Darwin, C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex . (D. Appleton and company, 1871). Perrett, D. I. et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394 , 884-887, doi:10.1038/29772 (1998). da Silva, J. M., Herrel, A., Measey, G. J. & Tolley, K. A. Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons. PLoS One 9 , e86846, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086846 (2014). Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C. H., Barbee, A. P. & Druen, P. B. Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours - Consistency and Variability in the Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Physical Attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 68 , 261-279, doi:Doi 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 (1995). Johnston, S. E. et al. Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502 , 93-+, doi:10.1038/nature12489 (2013). Katsumura, T. et al. Natural allelic variations of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes affect sexual dimorphism in Oryzias latipes. Proc Biol Sci 281 , doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2259 (2014). Andersson, M. & Iwasa, Y. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11 , 53-58, doi:Doi 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1 (1996). Plavcan, J. M. Inferring social behavior from sexual dimorphism in the fossil record. J Hum Evol 39 , 327-344, doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0423 (2000). Leutenegger, W. & Kelly, J. T. Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 42 , 314-314 (1975). Short, R. V. & Balaban, E. The differences between the sexes . (Cambridge University Press, 1994). Palinkas, M. et al. Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol 55 , 797-802, doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016 (2010). Tattersall, I. Cranial anatomy of archaeolemurinae (Lemuroidea, Primates). Anthropol Pap Am Mus 52 , 1-110 (1973). Taylor, A. B. Masticatory form and function in the African apes. Am J Phys Anthropol 117 , 133-156, doi:10.1002/ajpa.10013 (2002). Hylander, W. L. Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: an in vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible. J Morphol 159 , 253-296, doi:10.1002/jmor.1051590208 (1979). Schlager, S. & Rudell, A. Sexual dimorphism and population affinity in the human zygomatic structure-comparing wurface to outline data. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 300 , 226-237, doi:10.1002/ar.23450 (2017). Baab, K. L., Freidline, S. E., Wang, S. L. & Hanson, T. Relationship of cranial robusticity to cranial form, geography and climate in Homo sapiens. Am J Phys Anthropol 141 , 97-115, doi:10.1002/ajpa.21120 (2010). Garvin, H. M., Sholts, S. B. & Mosca, L. A. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size. Am J Phys Anthropol 154 , 259-269, doi:10.1002/ajpa.22502 (2014). Thayer, Z. M. & Dobson, S. D. Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis. PLoS One 8 , e60681, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060681 (2013). Hopman, S. M., Merks, J. H., Suttie, M., Hennekam, R. C. & Hammond, P. Face shape differs in phylogenetically related populations. Eur J Hum Genet 22 , 1268-1271, doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.289 (2014). Larson, J. R. et al. Body size and allometric variation in facial shape in children. Am J Phys Anthropol 165 , 327-342, doi:10.1002/ajpa.23356 (2018). Health., N. I. o. Racial and ethnic categories and definitions for NIH diversity programs and for other reporting purposes , (2015). Tanikawa, C., Zere, E. & Takada, K. Sexual dimorphism in the facial morphology of adult humans: A three-dimensional analysis. Homo 67 , 23-49, doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2015.10.001 (2016). Tanikawa, C. & Takada, K. Objective classification of nose-lip-chin profiles and their relation to dentoskeletal traits. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 17 , 226-238, doi:10.1111/ocr.12047 (2014). Wada, K. A study of the individual growth of maxillofacial skeleton by means of lateral cephalometric roentgenograms. . J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 22 , 239–269 (1977). Yashiro, K., Takagi, M. & Takada, K. Smoothness of chewing jaw movements in adults with mandibular prognathism. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 39 , 100-110, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02256.x (2012). Tome, W., Yashiro, K. & Takada, K. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusion improves impaired skillfulness of masticatory jaw movements. Angle Orthod 79 , 1078-1083, doi:10.2319/052708-282R.1 (2009). Barlow, S. M. & Rath, E. M. Maximum voluntary closing forces in the upper and lower lips of humans. J Speech Hear Res 28 , 373-376, doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.373 (1985). Noda, K., Chang, H. P., Takahashi, I., Kinoshita, Z. & Kawamoto, T. Effects of the anabolic steroid nandrolone phenylpropionate on craniofacial growth in rats. J Morphol 220 , 25-33, doi:10.1002/jmor.1052200104 (1994). Kasperk, C. et al. Skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in human osteoblastic cell populations. Calcif Tissue Int 61 , 464-473, doi:10.1007/s002239900369 (1997). Whitehouse, A. J. O. et al. Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 282 , doi:ARTN 2015135110.1098/rspb.2015.1351 (2015). Miura, H., Watanabe, S., Isogai, E. & Miura, K. Comparison of maximum bite force and dentate status between healthy and frail elderly persons. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28 , 592-595, doi:DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00716.x (2001). Hylander, W. L., Picq, P. G. & Johnson, K. R. Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 86 , 1-36, doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330860102 (1991). Ravosa, M. J., Noble, V. E., Hylander, W. L., Johnson, K. R. & Kowalski, E. M. Masticatory stress, orbital orientation and the evolution of the primate postorbital bar. J Hum Evol 38 , 667-693, doi:DOI 10.1006/jhev.1999.0380 (2000). Kupczik, K. et al. Masticatory loading and bone adaptation in the supraorbital torus of developing macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol 139 , 193-203, doi:10.1002/ajpa.20972 (2009). Russell, M. D. Tooth Eruption and Browridge Formation. Am J Phys Anthropol 58 , 59-65, doi:DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330580107 (1982). Hylander, W. L. & Ravosa, M. J. in Structure, function and evolution of teeth (eds P. Smith & E. Tchernov) (London: Freund Publishing House Ltd., 1993). Ross, C. F. et al. Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: Sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis. Anat Rec Part A 283a , 288-299, doi:10.1002/ar.a.20170 (2005). Hilloowala, R., Trent, R. & Dal Pozzo, G. Role of the mandibular first molar in the development of the supraorbital region in apes and humans. Anthropol Anz 51 , 275-282 (1993). Rosas, A. & Bastir, M. Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. Am J Phys Anthropol 117 , 236-245, doi:10.1002/ajpa.10023 (2002). Holton, N. E., Yokley, T. R., Froehle, A. W. & Southard, T. E. Ontogenetic scaling of the human nose in a longitudinal Sample: Implications for genus Homo facial evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 153 , 52-60, doi:10.1002/ajpa.22402 (2014). Kesterke, M. J. et al. Using the 3D facial norms database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults. Biol Sex Differ 7 , doi:ARTN 2310.1186/s13293-016-0076-8 (2016). Bastir, M., Godoy, P. & Rosas, A. Common features of sexual dimorphism in the cranial airways of different human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 146 , 414-422, doi:10.1002/ajpa.21596 (2011). Enlow, D. H. & Hunter, W. S. A differential analysis of sutural and remodeling growth in the human face. Am J Orthod 52 , 823-830, doi:10.1016/0002-9416(66)90251-x (1966). Pilsl, U., Anderhuber, F. & Rzany, B. Anatomy of the cheek: implications for soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg 38 , 1254-1262, doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02382.x (2012). Enlow, D. H. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Am J Orthod 52 , 283-299, doi:10.1016/0002-9416(66)90169-2 (1966). Talbert, L., Kau, C. H., Christou, T., Vlachos, C. & Souccar, N. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population. J Orthod 41 , 19-29, doi:10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000077 (2014). Kim, J. Y., Kau, C. H., Christou, T., Ovsenik, M. & Guk Park, Y. Three-dimensional analysis of normal facial morphologies of Asians and Whites: A novel method of quantitative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4 , e865, doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000853 (2016). Gor, T., Kau, C. H., English, J. D., Lee, R. P. & Borbely, P. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 , 424-432, doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.022 (2010). Zaidi, A. A. et al. Investigating the case of human nose shape and climate adaptation. PLoS Genet 13 , e1006616, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006616 (2017). Lacruz, R. S. et al. Distinct growth of the nasomaxillary complex in Au. sediba. Sci Rep 5 , 15175, doi:10.1038/srep15175 (2015). Holton, N. E. et al. The ontogeny of the chin: an analysis of allometric and biomechanical scaling. J Anat 226 , 549-559, doi:10.1111/joa.12307 (2015). Relethford, J. H. & Jorde, L. B. Genetic evidence for larger African population size during recent human evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol 108 , 251-260, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199903)108:33.0.CO;2-H (1999). Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. Nat Genet 33 Suppl , 266-275, doi:10.1038/ng1113 (2003). Stringer, C. Palaeoanthropology. Coasting out of Africa. Nature 405 , 24-25, 27, doi:10.1038/35011166 (2000). Aung, S. C., Ngim, R. C. K. & Lee, S. T. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. Brit J Plast Surg 48 , 551-558, doi:Doi 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90043-8 (1995). Tanikawa, C., Takada, K., van Aalst, J. & Trotman, C. A. Objective three-dimensional assessment of lip form in patients with repaired cleft lip. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 47 , 611-622, doi:10.1597/09-099 (2010). Kono, K., Tanikawa, C., Yanagita, T., Kamioka, H. & Yamashiro, T. A novel method to detect 3D mandibular changes related to soft-diet feeding. Frontiers in Physiology 8 , doi:ARTN 56710.3389/fphys.2017.00567 (2017). Tanikawa, C. & Takada, K. Test-retest reliability of smile tasks using three-dimensional facial topography. Angle Orthodontist 88 , 319-328, doi:10.2319/062617-425.1 (2018). Toro-Ibacache, V., Munoz, V. Z. & O'Higgins, P. The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting. Ann Anat 203 , 59-68, doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2015.03.002 (2016). Jung, S. & Marron, J. S. Pca Consistency in high dimension, low sample size context. Ann Stat 37 , 4104-4130, doi:10.1214/09-Aos709 (2009). Tables Table 1 Multifactor analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the surface-based model Df Pillai Approx F Num Df Den Df Pr(> F) Population 1 0.30 36.65 3 262 < 2e-16 Sex 1 0.73 231.53 3 262 < 2e-16 Population : Sex 1 0.00 0.23 3 262 0.88 Residuals 264 Table 2 Summary of findings in the present study that represented significant sexual dimorphism and were unique to female compared with male subjects in each respective racial group. Anatomy Findings unique to the female subjects Turkish Japanese Face height Shorter face height due to shorter lower face height ✔ ✔ Decreased chin height ✔ Smaller ratio of total face height to mandible width ✔ Forehead Flatter ✔ ✔ Vertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows Greater ✔ Eyes Greater eye height ✔ Face (zygomatic) width Wider face (zygomatic) width ✔ Cheek Greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region and less prominence of the cheek in the parotid–masseteric region ✔ ✔ Nose Transversely and anteroposteriorly smaller in size ✔ ✔ Flatter nasal dorsum ✔ Subnasal region and upper lip vermilion Greater retrusion of the columella base and upper lip ✔ ✔ Mouth A vertically shorter subnasale region and superiorly positioned mouth ✔ Chin Shallow labio-mental sulcus ✔ ✔ indicates that there were significant sexual differences in facial form. For details, see Supplementary Tables S1, S2, and S3. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Supportinginformatiolast2.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 17 Aug, 2021 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 06 Apr, 2021 Reviews received at journal 25 Mar, 2021 Reviewers agreed at journal 08 Mar, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 07 Mar, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 01 Mar, 2021 Editor invited by journal 17 Feb, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 16 Feb, 2021 First submitted to journal 07 Feb, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-221121","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":12029809,"identity":"18a3610b-8140-4507-9a9e-0dba6aa7aaee","order_by":0,"name":"Chihiro Tanikawa","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Osaka University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chihiro","middleName":"","lastName":"Tanikawa","suffix":""},{"id":12029811,"identity":"93784c11-6067-4473-9a74-4bc98eb2993f","order_by":1,"name":"M Okan Akcam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ankara University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"M","middleName":"Okan","lastName":"Akcam","suffix":""},{"id":12029815,"identity":"b96deaac-3e59-4d8e-b6b2-6a917812f801","order_by":2,"name":"Hatice Gokalp","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ankara University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hatice","middleName":"","lastName":"Gokalp","suffix":""},{"id":12029817,"identity":"46e64545-5ed2-4e0d-a23f-65ab5192817a","order_by":3,"name":"Edlira Zere","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Osaka University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Edlira","middleName":"","lastName":"Zere","suffix":""},{"id":12029819,"identity":"7eb74d1d-c0bf-4eca-a76c-a53c881cb0ef","order_by":4,"name":"Kenji Takada","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Osaka University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kenji","middleName":"","lastName":"Takada","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-02-08 04:14:06","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9","type":"published","date":"2021-08-17T15:02:15+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":6233406,"identity":"0807ad6d-e06d-4c32-93b3-ab5160642bdf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:19:17","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":565197,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Computer-generated modeled faces that enhance understanding of sexual dimorphism in young human adults by demonstrating site-specific accentuated facial topography in Turkish (top) and in Japanese (bottom) populations. M and F, averaged male and female faces, respectively. Average, the averaged face of all subjects; 2M and 3M, the accentuated averaged male face weighted by 2 and 3, respectively (i.e., w=2, 3); 2F and 3F, the accentuated female face weighted by 2 and 3, respectively (i.e., w=2, 3). Top, lateral view; middle, frontal view; bottom, contour map.","description":"","filename":"Fig1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/c53bee0d2074607de8b7c70d.jpg"},{"id":6232924,"identity":"369eb376-accc-4487-87d8-e692285cd074","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:16:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":349027,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Significance probability maps [top (Turkish) and second from the bottom (Japanese)] and difference maps [female minus male; second from the top (Turkish) and bottom (Japanese)]. For the significance probability maps, blue designates P≤0.05; pale pink, P≤0.01; dark pink, P≤0.001; and purple, P≤0.0001. For the difference maps, red indicates that the female group exhibited greater values than the male group, whereas blue indicates that the male group exhibited greater values than the female group. Differences are represented in mm","description":"","filename":"Fig2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/b1cdea6b606435ec5d91200f.jpg"},{"id":6232925,"identity":"386837a3-3b13-4d80-b7bc-77ac73f22dfe","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:16:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":115719,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"A scatter plot matrix of the principal component (PC) scores for Turkish and Japanese males and females with a histogram in diagonal cells. The second PC shows a clear separation between populations. In PC 1, yellow (Japanese females) is not visible as it is fully overlapped by green (Japanese males). Shape changes associated with PCs 1-3 are shown in Fig 4.","description":"","filename":"Fig3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/44e52869a53a22931eab9454.jpg"},{"id":6232929,"identity":"5a5757d9-ce32-4483-a30a-df3dc50172e3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:16:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":105291,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Principal components analysis (PCA) results. PCs 1-3 explains 66.2% of shape variation across samples. A) Mean shape; B) Shape changes associated with PC1, which explains 29.7% of shape variation across samples; C) Shape changes associated with PC2, which explains 19.5% of shape variation across samples. D) Shape changes associated with PC3, which explains 17.0% of shape variation across samples.","description":"","filename":"Fig4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/e441baf1a8efb40b708fdb8b.jpg"},{"id":6233407,"identity":"72c41974-54c6-45e8-b399-032a178ff4a2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:19:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":152299,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Dendrogram produced by applying the single linkage method to the matrix of Mahalanobis distances between subgroup means. \nInformed consent was obtained to publish this image in an online open-access publication.","description":"","filename":"Fig5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/098234f3bae6813793a13181.jpg"},{"id":6232927,"identity":"f2f689ac-7c4b-4009-80ac-26076bdf6f41","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:16:18","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":125336,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Schematic illustration of the wire mesh fitting and the point cloud of the face that were examined. For each facial surface (top left), fitting of high-resolution template meshes or a generic model (bottom center) was performed using commercial software (HBM-Rugle, Medic Engineering Co., Kyoto) based on the landmarks assigned to each 3D image (top center). This method automatically generated a homogeneous model (top right) that consisted of 6,017 points (i.e., fitted mesh or semi-landmark nodes) on the wire mesh for each model with landmark anchors. The semi-landmark nodes on the wire mesh of the homogeneous model generated for each face were used for further calculation, as in Fig 5. ","description":"","filename":"Fig6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/e823f984b5ea36df3f420c39.jpg"},{"id":13669272,"identity":"44cb1313-0bf0-4022-8723-ce8921aa8191","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 11:00:03","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1195700,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/b5b6ba8b-367d-403a-bda2-9176b96632ae.pdf"},{"id":6232928,"identity":"87a1a458-bb10-416a-b445-d2eefbaf944a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-23 00:16:18","extension":"docx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":3651340,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Supportinginformatiolast2.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-221121/v1/9b9e3170491708b08fda21a4.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eCross-racial Consistency of Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Forms: Comparisons Between Turkish and Japanese Populations\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eSexual dimorphism (i.e., phenotypic differences between males and females) is thought to arise from both sexual and natural selection \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, it is assumed that sexual dimorphism in facial characteristics (i.e., face masculinity and femininity) of people in the modern age is speculated to reflect the evolutionary outcome of directional selection and signal indirect genetic benefits that may maximize an individual\u0026rsquo;s chances for reproduction and survival \u003csup\u003e1,2\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsequently, several psychological studies previously tried to explore universally preferred facial characteristics related to attractiveness \u003csup\u003e2,3\u003c/sup\u003e to elucidate the evolutionary origin of facial sexual dimorphism. One study \u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e revealed that certain facial forms are universally preferred in sexual selection; a woman\u0026rsquo;s attractiveness is related to higher and wider eyes, greater distance between the eyes, and a smaller chin, whereas a man\u0026rsquo;s attractiveness is related to large eyes, prominent cheekbones, and a large chin. Furthermore, two-dimensional mathematically modeled and accentuated face masculinity and femininity was related to attractiveness \u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, and these judgments were similar across different cultural backgrounds. Those studies tested the hypothesis that universal facial attractiveness itself is strongly driven by sexual selection, and the existence of cross-cultural consistency in attractiveness regarding face masculinity and femininity supports this hypothesis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, the evolutionary origin of facial morphology under natural selection has not been as extensively discussed in hominids. In animals, natural and sexual selection tend to act antagonistically on male sexual traits, such as in the case of the peacock\u0026rsquo;s tail \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. Some studies on animals inferred that environmental adaptation may cause phenotypic variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism among populations when there is a trade-off between natural and sexual selection \u003csup\u003e5,6\u003c/sup\u003e. Theoretically, however, sexual and natural selection may not act antagonistically on some sexual traits. For example, recent research on chameleons showed that natural and sexual selection interact in complex ways, and produce morphological variation in bite force \u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e; this finding indicates that there are some facial traits that can attract the opposite sex and also enhance individual survival probability to different degrees between male and female hominids. It is assumed that those traits would be strongly expressed as phenotypic differences between males and females, and would show lesser variations in the human race. Thus, we hypothesized that examining common facial characteristics among populations and those specific to each population will help elucidate trends in hominin facial evolution.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to facial shape sexual dimorphism, sexual size dimorphism is also a widespread phenomenon among animals \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. The occurrence of sexual size dimorphism has historically been explained by male-to-male competition \u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e. Among anthropoid primates, the sexual dimorphism in canine tooth size is an obvious dimorphism along with the body size sexual dimorphism \u003csup\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e. Due to the existence of this sexual dimorphism in dentition, traditionally, the hypothesis that male/female differences in size are related to male/female dietary differences has been considered. For example, a research examining the relationship of sexual dimorphism in dentition and body size showed that within the suborder Anthropoidea, there is a positive correlation between the degree of sexual dimorphism in body size and the degree of sexual dimorphism in canine size \u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e. However, with the evidence of numerous exceptions to this, there is no conclusive simple rule that relates the body size dimorphism to tooth size dimorphism \u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e. Generally, it can still be stated that an individual\u0026rsquo;s ability to intake proper amounts of food with a healthy chewing apparatus is a prerequisite for natural selection in both sexes. Even today, men require more calories than women to sustain a healthy weight \u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e. The greater maximum molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness of men \u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e may be related to their need for more calories compared with the corresponding need of women. Additionally, masticatory muscle size has a major impact on cranial structure \u003csup\u003e12\u003c/sup\u003e. Therefore, from a phylogenetic perspective, it is reasonable to assume that a well-developed masticatory apparatus in males is associated with the expression of facial sexual dimorphism with respect to both size and shape. However, our understanding of this subject has been limited, because few studies previously investigated the impact of the masticatory apparatus and muscle function on facial sexual dimorphism in Homo sapiens.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeveral researchers have discussed the hominid evolution and diets\u003csup\u003e13,14\u003c/sup\u003e. In order to resist the stress caused by frequently chewing tough foods, species that eat tougher food tend to have a thicker lower body of the jaw and mandibular joint \u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. The mandibular symphysis is placed relatively higher in order to increase the momentum of the masticatory muscles or to perform a more uniform occlusion in the entire cheek teeth \u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003e. With modern data related to different human races, sexual dimorphism of craniofacial hard tissue was previously analyzed in several researches to explore human evolution \u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. This was because craniofacial hard tissue was considered to reflect population history and sexual dimorphism to varying degrees. A recent study of the zygomatic bone shape was extracted from the computer tomography data of 98 Chinese and 96 Germans; it was found that population-related shape differences were captured primarily and sexual dimorphism were less distinct compared with the population differences \u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003e. Another study \u003csup\u003e16\u003c/sup\u003e examined a sample of modern human crania (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;281) designed to represent modern human geographic variations, as well as diverse subsistence activities, that can be subdivided into 14 main regional/genetic groups; they reported that robusticity of the cranial shape between males and females, was consistently different in different populations. Other researchers \u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e also studied cranial traits among different populations of modern African American, European American, and English groups; they observed greater variations in the sexual dimorphism of cranial traits. A separate study that evaluated the shape of the chin, among specimens of nine geographic regions, showed that sex differences were not geographically universal \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e. Consequently, cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism of hard tissue remains controversial.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSexual dimorphism of craniofacial soft tissue has also been studied. A previous study compared facial morphologies in two European Caucasian populations from the UK and Netherlands, and found that females had greater ethnic differences compared with males, which indicates non-universal sexual dimorphism \u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e. A more recent study on two cross-sectional cohorts of children from Tanzania and the United States showed, through principal component analysis (PCA) and multifactor analysis of variance (MANOVA), that both allometric trajectories and sexual dimorphism were detectable in this large sample, but were actually very similar in the two populations \u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e. Although these studies described overall variation between the analyzed samples, detailed common sexually dimorphic characteristics among populations have not yet been described. Few studies have examined common facial characteristics among populations and those specific to each population in a quantitative manner to reveal the evolutionary origin of these traits, and discussed the biological importance of oral and facial functions (including masticatory functions) in the evolution of each facial characteristics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, we examined if there is cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism that may help elucidate the importance of the masticatory organs based on three-dimensional (3D) facial surface configurations. Comparing sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations among different populations can provide insight into the evolutionary origin of facial sexual dimorphism. Briefly, because common characteristics between geographically distinct populations are thought to result from common evolutionary forces across populations, detecting possible relationships between these facial characteristics and the masticatory apparatus could strengthen our understanding of the importance of the masticatory apparatus or muscle function in the evolution of facial sexual dimorphism. Therefore, we analyzed sexual dimorphism in Turkish and Japanese populations, which are geographically distinct and have white and Asian origins, respectively \u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn our study \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e, we determined a new set of variables that were effective for characterizing the differences in 3D facial surface configurations between males and females in the Japanese population. The study revealed site specificity and strength or intensity of sexual dimorphism with regard to facial soft tissue. The hypothesis of our research is that there is a cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphic faces and its common characteristics can be explained by the masticatory functions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe objectives of the present study were:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo investigate whether the phenotypes that designate sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations differ between Japanese and Turkish populations or if they exhibit common features of sex difference\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo infer possible reasons that account for the observed commonality and dissimilarity from a biological aspect, especially with regard to the phylogenetic importance of the chewing apparatus.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAveraged faces and accentuated averaged faces\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure 1 depicts the averaged and accentuated averaged faces that were computed for the male and female Turkish and Japanese subjects. The faces with enhanced masculinity and femininity that were mathematically calculated based on the data employed in this study clearly revealed that female faces differed from male faces in 3D. In general, facial differences associated with sex in both ethnic groups were similar: females had a shorter face height, especially in the lower third of the face; a flatter forehead; and more rounded cheeks with a greater naso-labial fold.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSurface-based analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFigure 2 shows significance probability maps and actual differences of the X-, Y-, and Z-values, and Supplementary Fig S1 represents mean vectors from male to female subgroups in each group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eX-value\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e(transverse direction). \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eThe most significant differences in the x-axis were observed in the nasal alar and chin in both ethnic groups. Both ethnic groups showed a smaller nasal alar width and smaller chin width when normalized by the distance between right and left exocanthions (P\u0026lt;0.05). In the Turkish group, there were differences with respect to the left corner of the mouth, but not the right corner, on the X-axis; this meant that Turkish males had more laterally positioned corner of the mouth on the left side than the Turkish females.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eY-value\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e(vertical direction). \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eThe significance probability maps clearly showed that differences associated with sex were most prominent in the Y-axis among the three dimensions, especially in the Japanese group. The areas that showed significant differences were widely distributed along the lower faces; remarkable upward displacement was observed for the female subgroups, and this was consistent in both ethnic groups. This characteristic led to an apparent decrease in the vertical height of the lower facial height in the female subgroups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the supraorbital ridges also showed downward displacement in the male compared with female subgroups of both ethnic groups, which indicates that the male subjects had greatly sloped supraorbital ridges and female subjects had flatter foreheads in both ethnic groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn contrast, upward displacement of the subnasal region and the nasal tip in the female compared with male subgroup was only observed in the Japanese group; this trait is a sexually dimorphic phenotypic characteristic that was unique to the Japanese subjects. Moreover, greater upward displacement of the cheeks in the female subgroup was also only observed in the Japanese subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe nasal dorsum showed greater upward displacement in the Turkish male subgroup, which indicates a greater naso-frontal angle and greater nasal hump (P\u0026lt;0.05); this characteristic was unique to the Turkish subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eZ-axis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e(antero-posterior direction). \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eZ-value comparison showed the most consistent results between the two ethnic groups. Both ethnic groups had more protuberant cheeks in the female than in the male subjects. Additionally, females of both ethnic groups had more retruded subnasal regions than males, and males of both ethnic groups had significantly more protuberant nasal tips than females. The upper and lower lips were more retruded in the Japanese female group compared with the Japanese male group (P\u0026lt;0.05), and this characteristic was unique to the Japanese population.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariance of each population and each sex, and their interactions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe first three significant principal components, which explained 66.2% of the sample\u0026rsquo;s variance, were determined to be significant by scree plot analysis. As the first three eigenvalues of a population covariance matrix were large enough compared to the others, PCA was considered to be appropriate for dimensional reduction of the present high dimensional data that exceeds the observation numbers \u003csup\u003e23\u003c/sup\u003e. Visualization of the between-group structure of the surface data (Figs 3, 4) revealed a distinct separation between populations and, to a lesser extent, a noticeable expression of sexual dimorphism (second principal component). Mahalanobis distances between the two ethnic groups were 32.2 and 30.4 for the male and female subgroups, respectively. In contrast, Mahalanobis distances between the sex subgroups were 1.4 and 1.6 in the Japanese and Turkish groups, respectively (Supplementary Fig S2). These results indicate that the geographic variation in facial morphology was greater relative to within population variation related to sex. Sex and population affinity were highly significant P\u0026lt;0.01, Table 1), but there was no significant interaction of these two factors (P=0.88).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe results of the sectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis are shown in Supplementary Tables S1, S2, and S3, and summarized in Table 2 and Supplementary Text S1.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBriefly, both Turkish and Japanese females had (1) a shorter lower face height, (2) a flatter forehead, (3) greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and (4) an antero-posteriorly smaller nose, with a greater retrusion of the subnasal region when compared with their male counterparts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe following phenotypic characteristics of sexual dimorphism were racially unique: Turkish females had greater vertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows, greater zygomatic width, and a shallower labio-mental sulcus; Japanese females had greater eye height, a flatter nose, a more superiorly positioned mouth, and reduced horizontal mandibular width (P\u0026lt;0.01 and d\u0026gt;0.8).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese results were consistent with those of the surface-based analyses.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, principal components that explained 66.2% of the sample\u0026rsquo;s variance showed interaction between population affinity and sex were not significant, which indicates that both populations have statistically similar expressions of sexual dimorphism. Alternatively, our detailed analysis revealed that both cross-racial characteristics of facial sexual dimorphism that were common to both the Japanese and Turkish subjects, and some characteristics that were unique to each set of subjects. The presence of both similarities and differences in facial sexual dimorphism among races described in this study were consistent with previous controversial studies regarding cross-racial consistency \u003csup\u003e15\u0026ndash;18 20\u003c/sup\u003e. The common characteristics could have arisen from a strong selective force on fundamental function to survive as a result of natural selection, and the differing sexually dimorphic characteristics could be due to environmental adaptation under a trade-off between natural and sexual selection \u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRegarding the common sexual dimorphic characteristics, both the Japanese and Turkish females had a shorter face height, especially with regard to the lower face; a flatter forehead; greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region; and less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region. Furthermore, females in both ethnic groups had antero-posteriorly smaller noses and greater retrusion of the columella base and subnasal region.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFemales had a shorter lower anterior face height, especially with regard to the chin, in both ethnic groups. It should be noted that a previous cephalometric study\u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e documented temporal changes in the ratios of the anterior lower face height to the total face height in the Japanese population. Females exhibited the anterior lower face height to total face height ratio almost equal to or longer than males at 6, 8, and 10 years old. Females at 6, 10, and 14 years old had lower face height ratios that were similar to those of adults (6 years old\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;54.6% and adults\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;54.9%). It is after 12 years of age when males begin to have increased face height ratio \u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e. The observed increase in the lower anterior face height in males can be ascribed to sexual differences in pubertal growth potential of the mandible \u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e, which is prolonged in males compared with females.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThere are several explanations regarding why men have a greater lower anterior face height, especially in the chin after pubertal growth. From the perspective of mastication, it seems likely that the acquired basic skill for most fundamental motor performance, such as mastication and locomotion, is independent of sex \u003csup\u003e25\u003c/sup\u003e. A previous study \u003csup\u003e26\u003c/sup\u003e documented that the smoothness or skillfulness of masticatory jaw movement in terms of minimizing the jerk cost is not sex-specific. It should, however, also be noted that some parameters, such as the amount of jaw opening and movement velocity, are sensitive to sex-specific differences in jaw size and masticatory muscle properties\u003csup\u003e26\u003c/sup\u003e. Adult females show longer duration and lower peak velocity in masticatory jaw movement compared with males\u003csup\u003e25\u003c/sup\u003e; this can be ascribed to adult males generating greater muscle force and faster muscle contraction \u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e with greater muscle volume and size of the mandible, to which the jaw-closing muscles are attached. Sex influences on maximal molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness \u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, the anatomy and function of the masticatory muscles may contribute to explaining why females generally have smaller faces, especially in the lower third.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrom a biological perspective, sex hormones are major factors related to sexual dimorphism. In males, higher androgen serum levels at puberty exert potent osteoanabolic effects and therefore may contribute to this skeletal sexual dimorphism. Animal experiments with anabolic steroids demonstrated a clear effect on craniofacial growth, mainly as an increase in total skull length and increase in the depth of the antegonial notch\u003csup\u003e28\u003c/sup\u003e. Interestingly, a previous study showed that mandibular and cortical human osteoblastic cells of both sexes expressed higher androgen receptor mRNA levels and significantly more androgen binding sites per cell, and exhibited significantly greater mitogenic responses to the androgen dihydrotestosterone \u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e. Those results indicate that the vertically greater mandibular height in males observed in our study could be due to skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in the mandible. Additionally, a previous study that examined facial morphology of 1-year-old boys and girls showed the existence of early sexual dimorphism, and prenatal testosterone exposure is thought to be related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology \u003csup\u003e30\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, it is possible that androgens in males could contribute to facial sexual dimorphism both before and after puberty.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrevious studies on anthropoids revealed only smaller muscle strains in the supraorbital region in contrast to those in the infraorbital region or the zygomatic arch during mastication \u003csup\u003e31,32\u003c/sup\u003e. Animal studies \u003csup\u003e33,34\u003c/sup\u003e have also revealed that circumorbital structures became greater to provide rigidity against non-masticatory forces; these studies revealed that is unlikely that masticatory muscle forces contributed to the remodeling of the supraorbital torus. On the contrary, the development of the supraorbital ridge has been viewed as an ontogenetic adaptation to masticatory forces \u003csup\u003e35\u003c/sup\u003e. In primates, masticatory-stress models have been examined using in vivo experimental data. Primates have significant temporalis attachments that extend to almost the midline of the frontal bones; bending of the brow-ridges is thought to be due to the mastication force pushing upward and the masseter and temporalis muscles pulling downward \u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e. Few of the previous computational models, using finite element analysis of primate skulls \u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e, agree with these in vivo findings. A previous study \u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e found a positive correlation between the mesio-distal crown width of the mandibular first molar and the size of the supraorbital ridge in humans. Occlusal forces exerted on the molar teeth contribute to supraorbital torus formation. Because females generate weaker muscle force and slower muscle contraction than males \u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e, and exhibit decreased maximal molar bite force and masticatory muscle thickness \u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e, we should not rule out the possibility of contribution of masticatory muscle forces to supraorbital ridge formation in humans. Phylogenetically, the smaller supraorbital ridge observed in the female subjects in the present study may be explained by the differences in masticatory force magnitude and its relevant jaw muscle thickness between males and females \u003csup\u003e11,31\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, both Japanese and Turkish females showed an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when the eye distances were standardized. This result is in line with those of previous studies \u003csup\u003e39\u0026ndash;41\u003c/sup\u003e. Previous studies primarily hypothesized that males have evolved to have greater nasal cavity dimensions to facilitate the oxygen intake that is needed to maintain a larger body mass \u003csup\u003e38,42\u003c/sup\u003e. The degree of sexual dimorphism in nasal shape is considered to be potentially due to the functional integration between the nasal cavity and the respiratory system \u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe extent of the cheek region is defined as \u0026ldquo;superiorly to the zygomatic arch, inferiorly to the margin of the mandible, posteriorly to the ear, and anteriorly to the corner of the mouth\u0026rdquo; and is divided into four parts as topographical regions: infra-orbital, buccal, zygomatic, and parotid\u0026ndash;masseteric regions \u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, in the infraorbital and buccal regions, the sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region was greater in the female subjects on the left side. Furthermore, lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid\u0026ndash;masseteric region was also observed in both Japanese and Turkish female subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid\u0026ndash;masseteric region can be explained by the smaller masseter muscles in women \u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e. Thin masseter muscles lead to a lesser prominence of the cheek in the parotid\u0026ndash;masseteric region in women.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEffects of developmental and functional interactions on morphological variability of the head through ontogeny have been discussed in previous studies \u003csup\u003e43,45\u003c/sup\u003e. Several studies\u003csup\u003e43,45\u003c/sup\u003e have claimed that genetic signals determine the initial geometry of craniofacial anatomy, and that geometry is altered by the local mechanical environment, such as masticatory function and respiratory function, through variations in the spatio-temporal interplay of depository and resorptive activity of bone. In contrast, there is very little concrete evidence of the relationship between functional and phylogenetic development in facial configurations. In general, it is assumed that varying environmental conditions, such as climates, geographic areas, and dietary resources, require physical characteristics, including dento-facial features, which contribute to maximizing the survival probability of individuals. Hominids are now recognized as showing higher adaptability to their surrounding environment based on related morphological changes than was previously understood.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the past, several researches have addressed 3D morphological differences between populations. For example, between Caucasians and African-Americans, the most distinct differences were observed in the forehead, alar base, and perioricular regions using 3D facial data \u003csup\u003e46\u003c/sup\u003e; between Caucasians and Asians, differences were observed in the malar and zygomatic areas, forehead, lips, and chin \u003csup\u003e47\u003c/sup\u003e. Even in the phylogenetically related populations, there were differences seen in the nasal, malar, lips, and lower facial regions between two population groups (Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Tex) \u003csup\u003e48\u003c/sup\u003e; differences were also observed in the nasal width, eye distances, and facial height of two European Caucasian populations of close phylogenetic and geographic proximity (UK and Netherlands) \u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e. In short, the previous studies described the facial differences between the population groups; however, limited data has been reported regarding varied facial sexual dimorphic characteristics among populations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the present study, four features in the Japanese and three in the Turkish were found to be exclusive sexual dimorphic characteristics. In the Japanese subjects, females had greater eye height (i.e., brighter eyes) compared with males. A medium or high upper eyelid crease is known to represent an attractive face in East Asian females, and 50% of females exhibit a minimal or absence of a double eyelid \u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e. Although greater eye height is also deemed an important factor for facial attractiveness in other racial or ethnic groups, the present results indicate that eye height is a visible facial sexual dimorphism that is more discriminatory in the Japanese subjects than the Turkish subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eJapanese females also showed a smaller anteroposterior protrusion of the nasal dorsum at the orbital level (i.e., a flatter nose) and a superiorly positioned mouth with a vertically shorter subnasal region. Additionally, shorter horizontal mandibular width was observed in the Japanese females. These findings indicate that Japanese females had overall smaller middle and lower facial structures than males. In a previous study that examined the 3D nasal shape and genotype in 3,746 individuals, nares width was correlated with temperature and absolute humidity \u003csup\u003e49\u003c/sup\u003e. This result indicates that at least sexual dimorphism in nasal shape may change because of climate adaptation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn contrast to the Japanese females, three features were found to be characteristic of the Turkish females compared with Turkish males. There was a greater vertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows, and an increased zygomatic width compared with exocanthion\u0026ndash;exocanthion distance. These traits reflect a stout upper facial structure. Facial ontogeny research on immature hominids with a finite element model\u003csup\u003e50\u003c/sup\u003e showed that bone deposition was identified over the outer aspects of the orbits, lateral nasal walls, infraorbital region, zygomatico-maxillary region, parts of the mid-clivus, including the canine jugum, and interincisal protuberance, as well as portions of the nasal sill and areas lateral to the intermaxillary suture; they inferred that these changes were related to the masticatory system \u003csup\u003e50\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA shallower labio-mental sulcus also characterized Turkish female compared with male faces. A recent study \u003csup\u003e51\u003c/sup\u003e indicated that an ontogenetic decrease in chin prominence was associated with increased vertical bending resistance and vice versa. Thus, it can be inferred that a shallow labiomental sulcus was unique to the current Turkish female participants, which indicates an adaptational response of Turkish females, who have delicately constituted jaw bones and muscles, compared with Turkish males in a dietary environment that includes tougher animal proteins compared with the Japanese dietary environment.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt is well known that Africa is the ancestral homeland of modern humans \u003csup\u003e52\u003c/sup\u003e. A phylogenetic tree showed the categorization of the world population into nine sub-populations based on the polymorphisms of protein genes of 1,915 populations: African; North African and West Asian; European; Amerind; Arctic Northeast Asian; Northeast Asian; Southeast Asian; Pacific Islander; and New Guinean and Australian \u003csup\u003e53\u003c/sup\u003e. The genetic distances between Japanese (Northeast Asian) and Turkish (European) were moderately far (55% of total distance) whereas European and North African were close (7%); this indicated that Japanese and Turkish (European) had different developmental route \u003csup\u003e53\u003c/sup\u003e. Genetic data also provided some indication that the spread of humans into Asia was along the coast to south and south-east Asia, from where it bifurcated to the north and south \u003csup\u003e54\u003c/sup\u003e. Thus, our comparisons of sexual dimorphism in facial forms between Turkish and Japanese populations can explain a relatively long span of genetic drift, which is the result of population variation among individual genotypes in their probabilities of survival and/or reproduction.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAlthough the present study does not provide a convincing explanation about whether the sexual dimorphisms, which were determined in the present study to be unique to each racial group, represent consequences of natural selection for ethnicities that successfully adapted to dietary environments for many generations. Therefore, although we must be cautious about the limitations of interpreting these data, the results of the present study further enhance our understanding of human sexual dimorphism expressed in the oral and facial regions.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe found four facial features representing sexual dimorphism that are common to both ethnic groups. Both Turkish and Japanese females had (1) a shorter lower face height, (2) a flatter forehead, (3) greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and (4) an antero-posteriorly smaller nose, with a greater retrusion of the subnasal region when compared with their male counterparts. These results provided implications for the potential contribution of chewing apparatus in adaptation.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Material And Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSubjects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA total of 272 subjects, which included 72 Turkish (Turkish group; females = 36 [Turkish female subgroup]; male = 36 [Turkish male subgroup]) and 200 Japanese (females = 100 [Japanese female subgroup], males = 100 [Japanese male subgroup]) aged between 18 and 35 years, were recruited from among the students and faculty of Ankara University in Turkey and Osaka University in Japan who met the following selection criteria: no congenital facial deformities including cleft lip or palate, no facial paralysis, no noticeable scars or skin disease in the neck or dentofacial regions (or history thereof), no history of any psychiatric disorder, no subjectively or objectively discernible jaw dysfunction, a body mass index [BMI] that ranged from 18.50 to 24.99, a dental overbite that ranged from 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm, a dental overjet that ranged from 0.0 mm to 7.0 mm, and a straight soft-tissue facial profile. For the present Japanese group, we used the samples from our previous study \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. Due to recording limitations with 3-D digital cameras, male subjects having thick beards were excluded in advance. A written informed consent form was distributed to and signed by all participants. Informed consent was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Osaka University Dental Hospital (project ID: H25-E37-1) and the Ethics Committee, Ankara University (project ID: 36290600/S5).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eacquisition\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe participants were asked to sit on a fixed chair with a natural head position without head support. They were then asked to assume a resting posture, which was defined as a relaxed facial posture with the lips in repose and the teeth in light contact in the habitual maximum intercuspation position. Each subject\u0026rsquo;s face was recorded once with a 3-D digital camera (3dMDcranial System, 3dMD, Atlanta, GA, USA) with a 1.5-millisecond capture speed and a dimensional accuracy of 0.2 mm \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach 3D facial image, scaled down to 75% of its actual size, was displayed on a 17-in LCD monitor (1701FP, Dell, Inc., Round Rock, TX, USA). The positions of 10 single and 8 paired landmarks (glabella [Gla], nasion [N], exocanthion [Ex], endocanthion [En], palpebrale superius [Ps], palpebrale inferius [Pi], porion [Po], orbitale [Or], pronasale [Prn], alar curvature point [Ac], subnasale [Sn], labiale superius [Ls], stomion [Sto], cheilion [Ch], labiale inferius [Li], submentale [Sm], pogonion [Pog], gnathion [Gn] (Supplementary Table S4, Supplementary Fig S3) were identified by visual inspection of the image and digitized using a computer mouse cursor and commercial software (Face Rugle, Medic Engineering Co., Kyoto, Japan). The zygomaticus\u0026prime; [Zy\u0026prime;] and gonion\u0026prime; [Go\u0026prime;] were mathematically defined as the most lateral point of the mathematically defined facial outline and the most inferior and lateral point of the mandibular facial outline, respectively, where the facial outline was defined as a series of the points with 60\u0026deg; angles between the surface normal vectors and Z-axis \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. The process was repeated twice for each image, and the landmark coordinates from the two digitizations produced were averaged to yield the final landmark coordinates. A previous study \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e that investigated the intra-observer reliability confirmed a mean absolute landmark difference of 0.32 mm (range, 0.07 mm to 0.52 mm) between the repeated measures (Supplementary Text S2). This result falls into the range considered reliable to highly reliable \u003csup\u003e55\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA 3D coordinate system identical to that employed in our previous study (Supplementary Fig S3; Informed consent was obtained to publish this image in an online open-access publication.) \u003csup\u003e56 \u003c/sup\u003ewas used in the current study. In short, the sagittal plane was defined by the exocanthions and endocanthions, and the axial plane was defined by the exocanthions, porion, and subnasale. The nasion was set as the origin.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAnalyses\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe 3D soft tissue facial morphology was evaluated by the two kinds of analysis: surface- and sectional-line-and-landmark-based analyses \u003csup\u003e22,57\u003c/sup\u003e, which are summarized below.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(1) Surface-based analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe morphology of the facial surface was analyzed using the method documented in our previous study \u003csup\u003e22,57\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eHomogeneous modeling. \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eFor each facial surface, fitting of high-resolution template meshes or a generic model \u003csup\u003e57,58\u003c/sup\u003e was performed using commercial software (HBM-Rugle, Medic Engineering Co., Kyoto) based on the landmarks assigned to each 3D image. This method automatically generated a homogeneous model that consisted of 6,017 points (i.e., fitted mesh or semi-landmark nodes) on the wire mesh for each model with landmark anchors (i.e., Ex, En, Ps, Pi, Prn, Ac, Sn, Ls, Sto, Ch, Li, Sm, and Pog). This technique permits the extraction of relevant surface anatomy from face data while removing and/or smoothing out non-relevant data, yielding high-resolution, 3D surface data that provide enough detail to facilitate a quantitative assessment while maintaining small file sizes that are easily manipulatable and portable to a range of visualization technologies \u003csup\u003e57,58\u003c/sup\u003e (Fig 5; Informed consent was obtained to publish this image in an online open-access publication.). The arithmetic means of the coordinate values of each corresponding point on the wire mesh were computed and used to generate the averaged 3D facial images for each male and female subgroup in each ethnic group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe surface displacement was quantitatively evaluated in each X-, Y-, and Z-axis in two different ways. The actual displacement vectors (male to female) and significance of differences were calculated for the 6,017 points on each mesh between the male and female subgroups in each ethnic group. The calculated vectors in millimeters were visualized with color-coding. Thereafter, the arithmetic means of the coordinate values of each corresponding point on the wire mesh were statistically analyzed for significant differences between the male and female subgroups using a two-sample t-test. A significance probability map \u003csup\u003e22,57\u003c/sup\u003e of the X-, Y-, and Z-values was generated to visualize these significant differences (Fig 6).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecause previous studies revealed that masticatory muscle function likely influences mandible morphology (mainly in the vertical direction) \u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e and inter-ocular width is less affected by masticatory muscle function \u003csup\u003e59\u003c/sup\u003e, the eyes, which are horizontally separated paired landmarks, were considered candidates for size normalization. A previous study\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003ealso showed that the right and left exocanthions were reliable points for identification. Thus, in the present study, facial size differences between individuals were standardized by normalizing the values of all surface coordinates to the distance between right and left exocanthions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSexual dimorphism of accentuated images\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eTo quantitatively infer facial form femininity and masculinity, accentuated averaged faces, \u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e\u0026nbsp;and \u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e were calculated for the male and female subgroups, respectively, to highlight site-specific sexual dimorphism \u003csup\u003e22,57\u003c/sup\u003e, where\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eand \u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e \u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e and\u0026nbsp;\u003cimg src=\"\" alt=\"\" /\u003e are the arithmetic means of the coordinate values for the male subgroup, female subgroup, and the sum of both groups, respectively, and \u003cem\u003ew\u003c/em\u003e is the arbitrary weight value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003examination of the variance of each population\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e and each\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003esex\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e, and their interactions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003eTo examine the variance in each population and each sex, and their interactions, we first reduced dimensionality by performing PCA for the 6,017 coordinates of the aforementioned surface model \u003csup\u003e60\u003c/sup\u003e. The significant principal components were determined by scree plot analysis. Significant principal components were entered into a MANOVA to test for significance of the factors population affinity and sex. After MANOVA, a dendrogram was computed by applying the single linkage method to the matrix of Mahalanobis distances between subgroup means.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(2)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSectional-line-and-landmark-based analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo analyze the surface data in detail, five categories of curving lines were extracted from the 3D images (Supplementary Table S5). The curving lines were used to extract 142 measurements that were previously reported (see Supplementary Figs S4, S5, and S6 for definitions of those variables) \u003csup\u003e23\u003c/sup\u003e. In addition, 28 inter-landmark distances and 15 ratios that were previously reported \u003csup\u003e22 \u003c/sup\u003ewere determined and employed. Therefore, 185 variables were employed in total. Facial size differences between individuals were also standardized by normalizing the values of all linear variables to the distance between right and left exocanthions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-test was performed to determine whether the mean of each variable significantly differed between the Turkish male and female subgroups. To examine the similarity and dissimilarities of facial forms between the Japanese and Turkish groups, we included the sexual dimorphism results from a Japanese group reported in our previous study \u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. The effect size was calculated for each variable. Values greater than 0.8 for Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d were considered to have a large effect. Variables that showed significant differences and had large effects were considered biologically significant. Significance level was set to 0.01 due to a power analysis with a power of 0.8.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of Interest Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll author's declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 22792048 and 25862008) and Osaka University. We thank Ms. Rukiye Gocer and Dr. Yuri Ohnishi for their help, support and suggestions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eC.T. and K.T. conceived the study and were in charge of overall direction and planning. C.T. designed the model and the computational framework and analyzed the data. C.T., O.A., H.G., and E.Z. carried out the data acquisition. C.T. and E.Z. performed the calculations. C.T. and K.T. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDarwin, C. \u003cem\u003eThe descent of man, and selection in relation to sex\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; (D. Appleton and company, 1871).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePerrett, D. I.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e394\u003c/strong\u003e, 884-887, doi:10.1038/29772 (1998).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eda Silva, J. M., Herrel, A., Measey, G. J. \u0026amp; Tolley, K. A. Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e9\u003c/strong\u003e, e86846, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086846 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C. H., Barbee, A. P. \u0026amp; Druen, P. B. Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours - Consistency and Variability in the Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Physical Attractiveness. \u003cem\u003eJ Pers Soc Psychol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e68\u003c/strong\u003e, 261-279, doi:Doi 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 (1995).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohnston, S. E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e502\u003c/strong\u003e, 93-+, doi:10.1038/nature12489 (2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKatsumura, T.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Natural allelic variations of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes affect sexual dimorphism in Oryzias latipes. \u003cem\u003eProc Biol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e281\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2259 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndersson, M. \u0026amp; Iwasa, Y. Sexual selection. \u003cem\u003eTrends Ecol Evol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11\u003c/strong\u003e, 53-58, doi:Doi 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1 (1996).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlavcan, J. M. Inferring social behavior from sexual dimorphism in the fossil record. \u003cem\u003eJ Hum Evol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e39\u003c/strong\u003e, 327-344, doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0423 (2000).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeutenegger, W. \u0026amp; Kelly, J. T. Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e42\u003c/strong\u003e, 314-314 (1975).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShort, R. V. \u0026amp; Balaban, E. \u003cem\u003eThe differences between the sexes\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; (Cambridge University Press, 1994).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePalinkas, M.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. \u003cem\u003eArch Oral Biol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e55\u003c/strong\u003e, 797-802, doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTattersall, I. Cranial anatomy of archaeolemurinae (Lemuroidea, Primates). \u003cem\u003eAnthropol Pap Am Mus\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e52\u003c/strong\u003e, 1-110 (1973).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTaylor, A. B. Masticatory form and function in the African apes. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e117\u003c/strong\u003e, 133-156, doi:10.1002/ajpa.10013 (2002).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHylander, W. L. Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: an in vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible. \u003cem\u003eJ Morphol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e159\u003c/strong\u003e, 253-296, doi:10.1002/jmor.1051590208 (1979).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchlager, S. \u0026amp; Rudell, A. Sexual dimorphism and population affinity in the human zygomatic structure-comparing wurface to outline data. \u003cem\u003eAnat Rec (Hoboken)\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e300\u003c/strong\u003e, 226-237, doi:10.1002/ar.23450 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBaab, K. L., Freidline, S. E., Wang, S. L. \u0026amp; Hanson, T. Relationship of cranial robusticity to cranial form, geography and climate in Homo sapiens. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e141\u003c/strong\u003e, 97-115, doi:10.1002/ajpa.21120 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarvin, H. M., Sholts, S. B. \u0026amp; Mosca, L. A. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e154\u003c/strong\u003e, 259-269, doi:10.1002/ajpa.22502 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThayer, Z. M. \u0026amp; Dobson, S. D. Geographic variation in chin shape challenges the universal facial attractiveness hypothesis. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e, e60681, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060681 (2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHopman, S. M., Merks, J. H., Suttie, M., Hennekam, R. C. \u0026amp; Hammond, P. Face shape differs in phylogenetically related populations. \u003cem\u003eEur J Hum Genet\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e22\u003c/strong\u003e, 1268-1271, doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.289 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLarson, J. R.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Body size and allometric variation in facial shape in children. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e165\u003c/strong\u003e, 327-342, doi:10.1002/ajpa.23356 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHealth., N. I. o. \u003cem\u003eRacial and ethnic categories and definitions for NIH diversity programs and for other reporting purposes\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026lt;https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-089.html \u0026gt; (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanikawa, C., Zere, E. \u0026amp; Takada, K. Sexual dimorphism in the facial morphology of adult humans: A three-dimensional analysis. \u003cem\u003eHomo\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e67\u003c/strong\u003e, 23-49, doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2015.10.001 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanikawa, C. \u0026amp; Takada, K. Objective classification of nose-lip-chin profiles and their relation to dentoskeletal traits. \u003cem\u003eOrthodontics \u0026amp; Craniofacial Research\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e17\u003c/strong\u003e, 226-238, doi:10.1111/ocr.12047 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWada, K. A study of the individual growth of maxillofacial skeleton by means of lateral cephalometric roentgenograms. . \u003cem\u003eJ Osaka Univ Dent Sch.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e22\u003c/strong\u003e, 239\u0026ndash;269 (1977).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYashiro, K., Takagi, M. \u0026amp; Takada, K. Smoothness of chewing jaw movements in adults with mandibular prognathism. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Oral Rehabilitation\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e39\u003c/strong\u003e, 100-110, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02256.x (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTome, W., Yashiro, K. \u0026amp; Takada, K. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusion improves impaired skillfulness of masticatory jaw movements. \u003cem\u003eAngle Orthod\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e79\u003c/strong\u003e, 1078-1083, doi:10.2319/052708-282R.1 (2009).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarlow, S. M. \u0026amp; Rath, E. M. Maximum voluntary closing forces in the upper and lower lips of humans. \u003cem\u003eJ Speech Hear Res\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 373-376, doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.373 (1985).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNoda, K., Chang, H. P., Takahashi, I., Kinoshita, Z. \u0026amp; Kawamoto, T. Effects of the anabolic steroid nandrolone phenylpropionate on craniofacial growth in rats. \u003cem\u003eJ Morphol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e220\u003c/strong\u003e, 25-33, doi:10.1002/jmor.1052200104 (1994).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKasperk, C.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in human osteoblastic cell populations. \u003cem\u003eCalcif Tissue Int\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e61\u003c/strong\u003e, 464-473, doi:10.1007/s002239900369 (1997).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhitehouse, A. J. O.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood. \u003cem\u003eP Roy Soc B-Biol Sci\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e282\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:ARTN 2015135110.1098/rspb.2015.1351 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMiura, H., Watanabe, S., Isogai, E. \u0026amp; Miura, K. Comparison of maximum bite force and dentate status between healthy and frail elderly persons. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Oral Rehabilitation\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e28\u003c/strong\u003e, 592-595, doi:DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00716.x (2001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHylander, W. L., Picq, P. G. \u0026amp; Johnson, K. R. Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e86\u003c/strong\u003e, 1-36, doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330860102 (1991).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRavosa, M. J., Noble, V. E., Hylander, W. L., Johnson, K. R. \u0026amp; Kowalski, E. M. Masticatory stress, orbital orientation and the evolution of the primate postorbital bar. \u003cem\u003eJ Hum Evol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e38\u003c/strong\u003e, 667-693, doi:DOI 10.1006/jhev.1999.0380 (2000).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKupczik, K.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Masticatory loading and bone adaptation in the supraorbital torus of developing macaques. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e139\u003c/strong\u003e, 193-203, doi:10.1002/ajpa.20972 (2009).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRussell, M. D. Tooth Eruption and Browridge Formation. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e58\u003c/strong\u003e, 59-65, doi:DOI 10.1002/ajpa.1330580107 (1982).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHylander, W. L. \u0026amp; Ravosa, M. J. in \u003cem\u003eStructure, function and evolution of teeth \u003c/em\u003e(eds P. Smith \u0026amp; E. Tchernov)\u0026nbsp; (London: Freund Publishing House Ltd., 1993).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoss, C. F.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: Sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis. \u003cem\u003eAnat Rec Part A\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e283a\u003c/strong\u003e, 288-299, doi:10.1002/ar.a.20170 (2005).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHilloowala, R., Trent, R. \u0026amp; Dal Pozzo, G. Role of the mandibular first molar in the development of the supraorbital region in apes and humans. \u003cem\u003eAnthropol Anz\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e51\u003c/strong\u003e, 275-282 (1993).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRosas, A. \u0026amp; Bastir, M. Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e117\u003c/strong\u003e, 236-245, doi:10.1002/ajpa.10023 (2002).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolton, N. E., Yokley, T. R., Froehle, A. W. \u0026amp; Southard, T. E. Ontogenetic scaling of the human nose in a longitudinal Sample: Implications for genus Homo facial evolution. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e153\u003c/strong\u003e, 52-60, doi:10.1002/ajpa.22402 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKesterke, M. J.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Using the 3D facial norms database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults. \u003cem\u003eBiol Sex Differ\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e7\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:ARTN 2310.1186/s13293-016-0076-8 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBastir, M., Godoy, P. \u0026amp; Rosas, A. Common features of sexual dimorphism in the cranial airways of different human populations. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e146\u003c/strong\u003e, 414-422, doi:10.1002/ajpa.21596 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnlow, D. H. \u0026amp; Hunter, W. S. A differential analysis of sutural and remodeling growth in the human face. \u003cem\u003eAm J Orthod\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e52\u003c/strong\u003e, 823-830, doi:10.1016/0002-9416(66)90251-x (1966).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePilsl, U., Anderhuber, F. \u0026amp; Rzany, B. Anatomy of the cheek: implications for soft tissue augmentation. \u003cem\u003eDermatol Surg\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e38\u003c/strong\u003e, 1254-1262, doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02382.x (2012).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnlow, D. H. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. \u003cem\u003eAm J Orthod\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e52\u003c/strong\u003e, 283-299, doi:10.1016/0002-9416(66)90169-2 (1966).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTalbert, L., Kau, C. H., Christou, T., Vlachos, C. \u0026amp; Souccar, N. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population. \u003cem\u003eJ Orthod\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e41\u003c/strong\u003e, 19-29, doi:10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000077 (2014).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKim, J. Y., Kau, C. H., Christou, T., Ovsenik, M. \u0026amp; Guk Park, Y. Three-dimensional analysis of normal facial morphologies of Asians and Whites: A novel method of quantitative analysis. \u003cem\u003ePlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e4\u003c/strong\u003e, e865, doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000853 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGor, T., Kau, C. H., English, J. D., Lee, R. P. \u0026amp; Borbely, P. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas. \u003cem\u003eAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e137\u003c/strong\u003e, 424-432, doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.022 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZaidi, A. A.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Investigating the case of human nose shape and climate adaptation. \u003cem\u003ePLoS Genet\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13\u003c/strong\u003e, e1006616, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006616 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLacruz, R. S.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Distinct growth of the nasomaxillary complex in Au. sediba. \u003cem\u003eSci Rep\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e5\u003c/strong\u003e, 15175, doi:10.1038/srep15175 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolton, N. E.\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The ontogeny of the chin: an analysis of allometric and biomechanical scaling. \u003cem\u003eJ Anat\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e226\u003c/strong\u003e, 549-559, doi:10.1111/joa.12307 (2015).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRelethford, J. H. \u0026amp; Jorde, L. B. Genetic evidence for larger African population size during recent human evolution. \u003cem\u003eAm J Phys Anthropol\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e108\u003c/strong\u003e, 251-260, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199903)108:3\u0026lt;251::AID-AJPA1\u0026gt;3.0.CO;2-H (1999).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCavalli-Sforza, L. L. \u0026amp; Feldman, M. W. The application of molecular genetic approaches to the study of human evolution. \u003cem\u003eNat Genet\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e33 Suppl\u003c/strong\u003e, 266-275, doi:10.1038/ng1113 (2003).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStringer, C. Palaeoanthropology. Coasting out of Africa. \u003cem\u003eNature\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e405\u003c/strong\u003e, 24-25, 27, doi:10.1038/35011166 (2000).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAung, S. C., Ngim, R. C. K. \u0026amp; Lee, S. T. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. \u003cem\u003eBrit J Plast Surg\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e48\u003c/strong\u003e, 551-558, doi:Doi 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90043-8 (1995).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanikawa, C., Takada, K., van Aalst, J. \u0026amp; Trotman, C. A. Objective three-dimensional assessment of lip form in patients with repaired cleft lip. \u003cem\u003eCleft Palate Craniofac J\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e47\u003c/strong\u003e, 611-622, doi:10.1597/09-099 (2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKono, K., Tanikawa, C., Yanagita, T., Kamioka, H. \u0026amp; Yamashiro, T. A novel method to detect 3D mandibular changes related to soft-diet feeding. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in Physiology\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8\u003c/strong\u003e, doi:ARTN 56710.3389/fphys.2017.00567 (2017).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanikawa, C. \u0026amp; Takada, K. Test-retest reliability of smile tasks using three-dimensional facial topography. \u003cem\u003eAngle Orthodontist\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e88\u003c/strong\u003e, 319-328, doi:10.2319/062617-425.1 (2018).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eToro-Ibacache, V., Munoz, V. Z. \u0026amp; O'Higgins, P. The relationship between skull morphology, masticatory muscle force and cranial skeletal deformation during biting. \u003cem\u003eAnn Anat\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e203\u003c/strong\u003e, 59-68, doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2015.03.002 (2016).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJung, S. \u0026amp; Marron, J. S. Pca Consistency in high dimension, low sample size context. \u003cem\u003eAnn Stat\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e37\u003c/strong\u003e, 4104-4130, doi:10.1214/09-Aos709 (2009).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMultifactor analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the surface-based model\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/caption\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDf\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePillai\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eApprox F\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNum Df\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDen Df\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePr(\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;F)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopulation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.30\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e36.65\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e262\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;2e-16\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSex\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.73\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e231.53\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e262\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;2e-16\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePopulation : Sex\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.00\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.23\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e262\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResiduals\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e264\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSummary of findings in the present study that represented significant sexual dimorphism and were unique to female compared with male subjects in each respective racial group.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/caption\u003e\n\u003cthead\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003cth colspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnatomy Findings unique to the female subjects\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTurkish\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJapanese\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/th\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/thead\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"3\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFace height\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShorter face height due to shorter lower face height\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDecreased chin height\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSmaller ratio of total face height to mandible width\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eForehead\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFlatter\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVertical distance between the eyes and eyebrows\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreater\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEyes\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreater eye height\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFace (zygomatic) width\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWider face (zygomatic) width\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCheek\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreater sagittal cheek protrusion in the posterior part of the infraorbital region and less prominence of the cheek in the parotid\u0026ndash;masseteric region\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNose\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTransversely and anteroposteriorly smaller in size\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFlatter nasal dorsum\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSubnasal region and upper lip vermilion\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreater retrusion of the columella base and upper lip\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMouth\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA vertically shorter subnasale region and superiorly positioned mouth\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChin\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShallow labio-mental sulcus\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e✔\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003ctfoot\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003e✔ indicates that there were significant sexual differences in facial form.\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eFor details, see Supplementary Tables S1, S2, and S3.\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tfoot\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Sexual dimorphism, Cross-racial consistency, Masticatory organ, Human face, 3D","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFacial features may reflect an individual’s probability of survival because of natural selection—for example, through reproduction and feeding abilities. However, questions remain about which facial characteristics contribute to facial masculinity and/or femininity across races. Given that sexual dimorphism stems from the common natural selection process, it is hypothesized that there is cross-racial consistency in sexual dimorphism of facial forms. Examining the extent to which sex differences in facial soft tissue configurations are similar across diverse populations could suggest the source of the indirect evolutionary benefits of facial sexual dimorphism traits. To explore this idea, we selected two geographically distinct races. Three-dimensional model faces were derived from 272 Turkish and Japanese men and women; their facial morphologies were evaluated using landmark and surface-based analyses. We found four common facial features related to sexual dimorphism. Both Turkish and Japanese females had a shorter lower face height, a flatter forehead, greater sagittal cheek protrusion in the infraorbital region but less prominence of the cheek in the parotid-masseteric region, and an antero-posteriorly smaller nose when compared with their male counterparts. We also discussed the possible phylogenetic contribution of masticatory organ function and morphogenesis on sexual dimorphism of the human face.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Cross-racial Consistency of Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Forms: Comparisons Between Turkish and Japanese Populations","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-02-23 00:16:16","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-221121/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2021-04-06T10:20:49+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-03-25T11:43:05+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"e4a2542c-6192-4021-b79b-9d1822245d79","date":"2021-03-08T09:11:09+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-03-08T03:38:32+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2021-03-01T13:35:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2021-02-17T07:07:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2021-02-16T06:32:26+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2021-02-08T04:03:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"978aa29d-8a87-41ef-82d3-bca56e96fbbd","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 23rd, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":2529113,"name":"Anthropology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-08-29T15:08:01+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-221121","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2021-08-17 15:02:15","publishedOnDateReadable":"August 17th, 2021"},"versionCreatedAt":"2021-02-23 00:16:16","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96029-9","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-221121","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-221121","identity":"rs-221121","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}