Fairness-Preserving Implementation of Machine Learning Models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This preprint studied a fairness-preserving framework for implementing machine learning models, combining data bias quantification with model-level fairness evaluation and methods to eliminate fairness violations. The authors used Earth Mover’s Distance to measure distributional discrepancy between subgroups and the overall population, and assessed fairness across five confusion-matrix-derived definitions (demographic parity, equalised odds, equal opportunity, false positive rate parity, and predictive parity) on a real-world health dataset using logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbours. They reported that fairness-preserving adjustments, mainly via targeted data modification, reduced fairness violations with minimal impact on overall model performance. The paper is not peer reviewed and provides planned future extensions (e.g., intersectional fairness, multi-class classification, dynamic data environments), though the empirical validation is limited to the stated dataset/algorithms. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Fairness in machine learning systems is essential for building trustworthy, ethical, and socially responsible AI, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and human services. This study proposes a comprehensive fairness-preserving framework integrating data bias quantification with model-level fairness evaluation and eliminating its violation. The framework uses Earth Mover’s Distance to quantify the distributional discrepancy between subgroups and the overall population, providing a statistical foundation for identifying group-level data bias. We assess fairness across five widely accepted definitions (i.e., demographic parity, equalised odds, equal opportunity, false positive rate parity, and predictive parity), each derived from the confusion matrix outcomes of ML models. The framework is empirically validated using a real-world health dataset and five commonly used supervised learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbours. Results show that fairness-preserving adjustments, mainly through targeted data modification, significantly reduce fairness violations with minimal impact on overall model performance. By combining data-level bias quantification with robust statistical validation, this work offers a practical and interpretable approach to implementing fairness in ML systems. The framework lays a foundation for future extensions incorporating intersectional fairness, multi-class classification, and dynamic data environments. It contributes toward the development of AI systems that are not only accurate but also equitable and accountable.
Full text 11,412 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Fairness-Preserving Implementation of Machine Learning Models | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Fairness-Preserving Implementation of Machine Learning Models Shahadat Uddin, Haohui Lu, Farshid Hajati This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Fairness in machine learning systems is essential for building trustworthy, ethical, and socially responsible AI, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and human services. This study proposes a comprehensive fairness-preserving framework integrating data bias quantification with model-level fairness evaluation and eliminating its violation. The framework uses Earth Mover’s Distance to quantify the distributional discrepancy between subgroups and the overall population, providing a statistical foundation for identifying group-level data bias. We assess fairness across five widely accepted definitions (i.e., demographic parity, equalised odds, equal opportunity, false positive rate parity, and predictive parity), each derived from the confusion matrix outcomes of ML models. The framework is empirically validated using a real-world health dataset and five commonly used supervised learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbours. Results show that fairness-preserving adjustments, mainly through targeted data modification, significantly reduce fairness violations with minimal impact on overall model performance. By combining data-level bias quantification with robust statistical validation, this work offers a practical and interpretable approach to implementing fairness in ML systems. The framework lays a foundation for future extensions incorporating intersectional fairness, multi-class classification, and dynamic data environments. It contributes toward the development of AI systems that are not only accurate but also equitable and accountable. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Machine Learning ML Fairness Earth Mover’s Distance Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6466737","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":444066008,"identity":"c0b70223-c6f6-4f3e-ac0a-14a4c203a550","order_by":0,"name":"Shahadat Uddin","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-6919","institution":"The University of Sydney","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shahadat","middleName":"","lastName":"Uddin","suffix":""},{"id":444066009,"identity":"8d7de9ba-024c-454c-a9d1-56d870422c39","order_by":1,"name":"Haohui Lu","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-156X","institution":"The University of Sydney","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Haohui","middleName":"","lastName":"Lu","suffix":""},{"id":444066010,"identity":"3d619c5a-6d3c-4d9b-8543-49f2e18ef801","order_by":2,"name":"Farshid Hajati","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-5297","institution":"University of New England","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Farshid","middleName":"","lastName":"Hajati","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-16 23:56:37","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":true,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":80864925,"identity":"249c15c9-4f3e-4585-ac0a-b3481ece2293","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-18 03:09:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":502070,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AFrameworkforFairnessv02.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6466737/v1_covered_0e3d4c5e-7f27-4417-9360-480f48778cc4.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eFairness-Preserving Implementation of Machine Learning Models\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"The University of Sydney","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Machine Learning, ML Fairness, Earth Mover’s Distance","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFairness in machine learning systems is essential for building trustworthy, ethical, and socially responsible AI, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and human services. This study proposes a comprehensive fairness-preserving framework integrating data bias quantification with model-level fairness evaluation and eliminating its violation. The framework uses Earth Mover\u0026rsquo;s Distance to quantify the distributional discrepancy between subgroups and the overall population, providing a statistical foundation for identifying group-level data bias. We assess fairness across five widely accepted definitions (i.e., demographic parity, equalised odds, equal opportunity, false positive rate parity, and predictive parity), each derived from the confusion matrix outcomes of ML models. The framework is empirically validated using a real-world health dataset and five commonly used supervised learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and K-Nearest Neighbours. Results show that fairness-preserving adjustments, mainly through targeted data modification, significantly reduce fairness violations with minimal impact on overall model performance. By combining data-level bias quantification with robust statistical validation, this work offers a practical and interpretable approach to implementing fairness in ML systems. The framework lays a foundation for future extensions incorporating intersectional fairness, multi-class classification, and dynamic data environments. It contributes toward the development of AI systems that are not only accurate but also equitable and accountable.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Fairness-Preserving Implementation of Machine Learning Models","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-18 02:53:49","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6466737/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"c2913c85-9bf6-45ad-97ca-01b08276e62d","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 18th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":47279755,"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-18T02:53:50+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-18 02:53:49","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6466737","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6466737","identity":"rs-6466737","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0