The role of cohesin loading at enhancers in the flux of loop extrusion and long-range transcriptional control

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper investigates whether enhancers act as privileged sites for cohesin loading that promote long-range genome looping and transcriptional activation, focusing on cohesin recruitment near enhancers versus its broader genome-wide roles. Using quantitative experiments in mouse embryonic stem cells together with biophysical modeling, the authors find that driving strong focal cohesin recruitment near an enhancer inhibits transcription from distal target promoters, and that enhancer-proximal loading does not substantially contribute to genome-wide cohesin binding or chromosome folding patterns. They conclude that cohesin must load throughout the genome to extrude it, with cohesin “traffic” mainly determined by extrusion barriers such as transcriptional activity and clustered CTCF sites. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Enhancers have been proposed to act as privileged loading sites for cohesin, raising the idea that they actively fold the genome to engage distal target promoters for transcription. Supporting this idea, NIPBL/MAU2, which is required for cohesin loading, binds at enhancers in mouse embryonic stem cells. However, we find that driving cohesin recruitment near an enhancer strongly inhibits transcription from its target distal promoter, indicating that strong focal cohesin loading at enhancers is not compatible with their long-range regulatory functions. Quantitative experiments and biophysical modeling further indicate that cohesin loading at enhancers does not make major contributions to genome-wide cohesin binding and chromosome folding patterns. Instead, cohesin must load throughout the genome to extrude it, regardless of enhancer proximity, with the major determinants of cohesin traffic being extrusion barriers such as transcription and clustered CTCF sites. These findings indicate that enhancer function is largely ancillary to the general mechanisms of chromosome folding, informing further study of the relationship between genome architecture and transcriptional regulation.
Full text 1,347 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Enhancers have been proposed to act as privileged loading sites for cohesin, raising the idea that they actively fold the genome to engage distal target promoters for transcription. Supporting this idea, NIPBL/MAU2, which is required for cohesin loading, binds at enhancers in mouse embryonic stem cells. However, we find that driving cohesin recruitment near an enhancer strongly inhibits transcription from its target distal promoter, indicating that strong focal cohesin loading at enhancers is not compatible with their long-range regulatory functions. Quantitative experiments and biophysical modeling further indicate that cohesin loading at enhancers does not make major contributions to genome-wide cohesin binding and chromosome folding patterns. Instead, cohesin must load throughout the genome to extrude it, regardless of enhancer proximity, with the major determinants of cohesin traffic being extrusion barriers such as transcription and clustered CTCF sites. These findings indicate that enhancer function is largely ancillary to the general mechanisms of chromosome folding, informing further study of the relationship between genome architecture and transcriptional regulation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Minor typos and text changes throughout the manuscript.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0