Artificial Intelligence and Control Charts: A Big Problem
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
We use the data of some published papers to compare those authors findings with ours. From the analysis we get different results: the cause is that they use the Probability Limits of the PI (Probability Interval) as they were the Confidence Limits (Control Limits of the Control Charts, CCs). The Control Limits in the Shewhart CCs are based on the Normal Distribution (Central Limit Theorem, CLT) and are not valid for non-normal distributed data: consequently, the decisions about the “In Control” (IC) and “Out Of Control” (OOC) states of the process are wrong. The Control Limits of the CCs are wrongly computed, due to unsound knowledge of the fundamental concept of Confidence Interval. Minitab and other software e (e.g. JMP, SAS) use the “T Charts”, claimed to be a good method for deal-ing with “rare events”, but their computed Control Limits of the CCs are wrong. The same happens for the Confidence Limits of the parameters of the distribution involved in the papers (Weibull, Inverse Weibull, Gamma, Binomial, Maxwell). We will show that the Re-liability Integral Theory (RIT) is able to solve these problems and the Sequential way of dealing with data.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0