Investment subsidies and SME performance under staggered treatment: Evidence from matched difference-in-differences

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

Investment subsidies significantly increase fixed asset accumulation in Spanish SMEs, with stronger effects for micro-enterprises and higher subsidy intensities, but show no short-run impact on revenue or employment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This preprint studied the causal effect of Spanish government investment subsidies on small and medium-sized enterprises’ performance when subsidy receipt is non-random and implemented in staggered cohorts over time. Using administrative subsidy records from the Spanish National Subsidies Database and firm accounting data from SABI (2018–2024), the authors combined propensity score matching with a doubly robust estimator to estimate group-time average treatment effects while accounting for treatment heterogeneity. They found subsidies increased fixed asset accumulation with no significant short-run effects on revenue, employment, or financial ratios, and that benefits were concentrated among micro-enterprises and rose monotonically with subsidy intensity. The paper is a preprint and not peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Monitoring of support schemes for small and medium-sized enterprises is essential to assess policy effectiveness and the efficient use of public resources. This paper evaluates the causal impact of investment subsidies on SME performance under non-random treatment assignment and staggered policy implementation. The empirical strategy combines propensity score matching, to construct a comparable control group, with a doubly robust estimator, which identifies group-time average treatment effects while accounting for treatment heterogeneity across cohorts and periods. The framework is implemented using administrative subsidy records from the Spanish National Subsidies Database (BDNS) and firm-level accounting data from SABI for the period 2018--2024. Results indicate that subsidies generate a positive and significant effect on fixed asset accumulation, with no significant short-run effects on revenue, employment, or financial ratios. Heterogeneity analysis shows that effects are concentrated among micro-enterprises and increase monotonically with subsidy intensity Plain English Summary. Public investment subsidies boost capital investment in small firms, but do not immediately improve sales or jobs for most recipients.We study the effect of Spanish government grants on small and medium-sized enterprises using a rigorous statistical method that accounts for the fact that firms receive subsidies at different points in time. We find that subsidies lead to a significant increase in fixed assets but have no significant short-run effect on revenue, employment, or financial health for the average recipient. However,the smallest firms, those with fewer than ten employees, do show broader benefits,including employment growth, and larger grants generate stronger effects. These findings suggest that policymakers designing SME support programmes should pay close attention to firm size and grant magnitude when allocating public funds, as blanket interventions may be ineffective for larger firms while provingtransformative for the smallest ones.
Full text 12,438 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Investment subsidies and SME performance under staggered treatment: Evidence from matched difference-in-differences | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Investment subsidies and SME performance under staggered treatment: Evidence from matched difference-in-differences Eugeni Gil-Ocana, Ana Garcia-Bernabeu, Pablo De Pedraza This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Monitoring of support schemes for small and medium-sized enterprises is essential to assess policy effectiveness and the efficient use of public resources. This paper evaluates the causal impact of investment subsidies on SME performance under non-random treatment assignment and staggered policy implementation. The empirical strategy combines propensity score matching, to construct a comparable control group, with a doubly robust estimator, which identifies group-time average treatment effects while accounting for treatment heterogeneity across cohorts and periods. The framework is implemented using administrative subsidy records from the Spanish National Subsidies Database (BDNS) and firm-level accounting data from SABI for the period 2018--2024. Results indicate that subsidies generate a positive and significant effect on fixed asset accumulation, with no significant short-run effects on revenue, employment, or financial ratios. Heterogeneity analysis shows that effects are concentrated among micro-enterprises and increase monotonically with subsidy intensity Plain English Summary. Public investment subsidies boost capital investment in small firms, but do not immediately improve sales or jobs for most recipients.We study the effect of Spanish government grants on small and medium-sized enterprises using a rigorous statistical method that accounts for the fact that firms receive subsidies at different points in time. We find that subsidies lead to a significant increase in fixed assets but have no significant short-run effect on revenue, employment, or financial health for the average recipient. However,the smallest firms, those with fewer than ten employees, do show broader benefits,including employment growth, and larger grants generate stronger effects. These findings suggest that policymakers designing SME support programmes should pay close attention to firm size and grant magnitude when allocating public funds, as blanket interventions may be ineffective for larger firms while provingtransformative for the smallest ones. Public subsidies SME policy evaluation Causal inference Matching methods Difference-in-differences Staggered treatment effects Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9498631","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":635425772,"identity":"91b27c23-764a-4082-8cff-b30957e06835","order_by":0,"name":"Eugeni Gil-Ocana","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universitat Politècnica de València","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eugeni","middleName":"","lastName":"Gil-Ocana","suffix":""},{"id":635425777,"identity":"9b7404a5-487f-4abe-8029-a5022f59117d","order_by":1,"name":"Ana Garcia-Bernabeu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universitat Politècnica de València","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ana","middleName":"","lastName":"Garcia-Bernabeu","suffix":""},{"id":635425780,"identity":"0b66bdb3-133e-4b33-9af6-e3c7be5fc5ef","order_by":2,"name":"Pablo De Pedraza","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Universitat Politècnica de València","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pablo","middleName":"","lastName":"De Pedraza","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-22 16:08:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":109205119,"identity":"a9ffb465-c2fc-4208-8d94-7d06d33a3d9a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-13 15:03:25","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":5515313,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9498631/v1_covered_0ead4e6b-6975-4852-bded-9eaa26e91b4a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Investment subsidies and SME performance under staggered treatment: Evidence from matched difference-in-differences","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Public subsidies, SME policy evaluation, Causal inference, Matching methods, Difference-in-differences, Staggered treatment effects","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eMonitoring of support schemes for small and medium-sized enterprises is essential to assess policy effectiveness and the efficient use of public resources. This paper evaluates the causal impact of investment subsidies on SME performance under non-random treatment assignment and staggered policy implementation. The empirical strategy combines propensity score matching, to construct a comparable control group, with a doubly robust estimator, which identifies group-time average treatment effects while accounting for treatment heterogeneity across cohorts and periods. The framework is implemented using administrative subsidy records from the Spanish National Subsidies Database (BDNS) and firm-level accounting data from SABI for the period 2018--2024. Results indicate that subsidies generate a positive and significant effect on fixed asset accumulation, with no significant short-run effects on revenue, employment, or financial ratios. Heterogeneity analysis shows that effects are concentrated among micro-enterprises and increase monotonically with subsidy intensity\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePlain English Summary. \u003c/strong\u003ePublic investment subsidies boost capital investment in small firms, but do not immediately improve sales or jobs for most recipients.We study the effect of Spanish government grants on small and medium-sized enterprises using a rigorous statistical method that accounts for the fact that firms receive subsidies at different points in time. We find that subsidies lead to a significant increase in fixed assets but have no significant short-run effect on revenue, employment, or financial health for the average recipient. However,the smallest firms, those with fewer than ten employees, do show broader benefits,including employment growth, and larger grants generate stronger effects. These findings suggest that policymakers designing SME support programmes should pay close attention to firm size and grant magnitude when allocating public funds, as blanket interventions may be ineffective for larger firms while provingtransformative for the smallest ones.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Investment subsidies and SME performance under staggered treatment: Evidence from matched difference-in-differences","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-05-12 18:13:21","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9498631/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"4e28e8dc-645b-431e-b905-be504f059693","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 12th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"262523495503070568856345711980944736739","date":"2026-05-06T10:44:23+00:00","index":18,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"314513319277713290371636194091007962228","date":"2026-05-04T09:41:38+00:00","index":14,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"6","date":"2026-05-04T08:29:27+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-12T18:13:22+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-05-12 18:13:21","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9498631","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9498631","identity":"rs-9498631","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0