Laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing using LigaSure™: Gazi hospital experience
This study evaluated laparoscopic hysterectomy using retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing with LigaSure in 50 women, finding it effective and safe with minimal bleeding and short hospital stays.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective study evaluated laparoscopic hysterectomy performed using retroperitoneal uterine artery sealing with LigaSure™ in 50 women with various indications, measuring mean operation time, intraoperative bleeding proxies (hemoglobin drop), uterine specimen weight, postoperative complications, and conversion to laparotomy. The mean operation time was 85 minutes and mean hemoglobin decreased by 0.4 g/dl by postoperative day 1; one major complication (cystotomy) occurred in a patient with severe adhesions after two prior cesarean sections repaired laparoscopically. Only one patient required conversion to an open abdominal approach due to severe bowel adhesions associated with rectovaginal endometriosis, and all patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 with no minor complications reported. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports a key surgical failure/conversion case attributable to rectovaginal endometriosis during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,352 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study 1999
- Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking 2005
- Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. 2001
Cited by (2)
References (14)
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study via openalex
- Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking via openalex
- Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. via openalex
- W2002465598 via openalex
- W2049446992 via openalex
- W2088101594 via openalex
- W2093175362 via openalex
- W2144738065 via openalex
- W2403635289 via openalex
- W3012567982 via openalex
- W128055854 via openalex
- W4235229803 via openalex
- W1521382446 via openalex
- W1993790913 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:15:24.848197+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:47:16.638238+00:00