Neural Flip-Flops III: Stomatogastric Ganglion

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This paper proposes explicit neural network models of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion pyloric CPG, demonstrating similarities in connectivity and oscillatory output, and introducing novel circuit designs.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The stomatogastric ganglion (STG) is a group of about 30 neurons that resides on the stomach in decapod crustaceans. Its two central pattern generators (CPGs) control the chewing action of the gastric mill and the peristaltic movement of food through the pylorus to the gut. The STG has been studied extensively because it has properties that are common to all nervous systems and because of the small number of neurons and other features that make it convenient to study. So many details are known that the STG is considered a classic test case in neuroscience for the reductionist strategy of explaining the emergence of macro-level phenomena from micro-level data. In spite of the intense scrutiny the STG has received, how it generates its rhythmic patterns of bursts remains unknown. The explicit neural networks proposed here model the pyloric CPG of the American lobster ( Homarus americanus ). The models share enough significant features with the lobster’s CPG that they may be considered first approximations, or perhaps simplified versions, of STG architecture. The similarities include 1) mostly inhibitory synapses; 2) pairs of cells with reciprocal inhibitory inputs, complementary outputs that are approximately 180 degrees out of phase, and state changes occurring with the high output changing first; 3) cells that have reciprocal, inhibitory inputs with more than one other cell; and 4) six cells that produce coordinated oscillations with the same period, four phases distributed approximately uniformly over the period, and half of the burst durations approximately 1/4 of the period and the other half 3/8. Each model’s connectivity is explicit, and its operation depends only on minimal neuron capabilities of excitation and inhibition. One model performs a function that fills a gap in standard ring oscillators. It is apparently new to engineering, making it an example of neuroscience and logic circuit design informing each other. Some models are derived from standard circuit designs by moving each negation symbol from one end of a connection to the other. This does not change the logic of the network, but it changes each logic gate to one that can be implemented with a single neuron.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0