Family Planning Practices and Women’s Impression of an Adapted Reproductive Life Plan in a Disadvantaged Area in Eswatini

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background Family planning in Eswatini is limited and unplanned pregnancies are common. The Reproductive Life Plan (RLP) is a clinical tool formerly evaluated in high-income settings aiming to increase pregnancy planning. Mentor Mothers (MM), i.e. Community Health Workers, were trained in using an adapted RLP and introduced it into family planning (FP) discussions with their clients. This study aimed to evaluate these women’s impression of the RLP and to investigate their FP practices.Method Women were recruited during home visits, purposively selected to cover all areas where the MMs are working. Data were collected in September and October 2018 using anonymous questionnaires filled out by women aged 15-44 years that were either mothers or pregnant mothers-to-be. The questionnaire consisted of 20 questions on background, fertility desires, pregnancy planning as well as quality and perceived need for FP support. Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact test were used for group comparisons and the need for more FP support.Results A total of 203 women participated. Most women (74% n=148) expressed that FP discussions with their MM using the RLP had helped them ‘very much’. A majority had a perceived need for these discussions; 70% wanted to have more support from their MM and 92% wanted more information about FP. Significantly more women with lower educational level (secondary or lower) and younger women (age 15-24 years) wanted more support compared to women with higher educational level and older women (p<0.001 and p=0.028). The unmet need for contraception was 22%.Conclusion The introduction of the RLP was well received among women but most of them requested more support in FP. Using the RLP may help women in this context achieve their reproductive goals.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0