Full text
36,274 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
A Rapid Multiplex LAMP Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of CT, NG, TV, and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in NG | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results A Rapid Multiplex LAMP Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of CT, NG, TV, and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in NG Shoulian Dong , Manuel X. Duval , Tri D. Do , Jeff Ho , Omar Abdallah , Michael R. White , Jacob C. Johnson , Christine Meda , Nancy Schoenbrunner doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.24.666671 Shoulian Dong 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Manuel X. Duval 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Tri D. Do 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jeff Ho 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Omar Abdallah 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Michael R. White 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jacob C. Johnson 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Christine Meda 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Nancy Schoenbrunner 1 AmplifiDx Inc , Newark, CA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: nancyschoenbrunner{at}amplifidx.com Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF ABSTRACT Rapid point-of-care (POC) diagnostics are essential tools for improving timely treatment and reducing the transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The STI NG Plus Assay is a rapid multiplex LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) NAAT (nucleic acid amplification test) capable of simultaneously detecting Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in NG ( gyrA S91F). In this study, we assessed the STI NG Plus assay primer design and analytical sensitivity. Using a bioinformatically optimized primer design pipeline and empirical screening, the assay demonstrated high inclusivity and specificity, with no cross-reactivity to 48 urogenital organisms or the human genome. Analytical sensitivity testing showed reliable detection of all targets in both lysis buffer and clinical matrix. Limits of detection were lower than those of an existing FDA-cleared test. The assay’s robustness, speed, and sensitivity support its potential for decentralized STI testing with integrated antimicrobial resistance profiling. INTRODUCTION Rapid diagnostic tests at the point-of-care (POC) are transforming infectious disease management by significantly reducing the time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, thus improving patient outcomes. Timely, accurate diagnostics in clinical settings enable immediate treatment decisions, enhance patient compliance, and reduce disease transmission, particularly in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) where follow-up visits may be challenging [ 1 , 2 ]. POC testing can enable a shift from empirical, symptom-based or history-based treatment to timely, result-driven treatment, reducing unnecessary exposure to antibiotics. Adoption of POC diagnostics has the potential to reduce total cost of care, when implemented in an evidence-based manner [ 3 - 5 ]. Studies have demonstrated that POC testing leads to improved patient satisfaction, reduced patient anxiety, and better clinical outcomes due to faster initiation of treatment [ 6 , 7 ]. A critical and growing threat within STI management is antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified NG as a high-priority pathogen due to escalating resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, including fluoroquinolones and extended-spectrum cephalosporins [ 8 , 9 ]. Molecular assays capable of detecting fluoroquinolone resistance mutations, such as the gyrA S91F mutation, provide an opportunity for targeted antibiotic therapy. Such resistance-informed testing promotes antibiotic stewardship by reducing inappropriate antibiotic use and preserving the effectiveness of existing antibiotic therapies [ 10 - 12 ]. Multiplex diagnostic platforms further enhance clinical utility by simultaneously detecting multiple pathogens and resistance markers. A multiplex POC assay capable of identifying Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations in NG will offer substantial clinical advantages. Enhanced sensitivity, particularly in assays utilizing loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), increases diagnostic accuracy, ensuring fewer false negatives and thus enabling more reliable clinical decision-making [ 13 - 15 ]. This improvement directly impacts patient outcomes through timely and appropriate interventions, reduced complications from untreated infections, and improved long-term reproductive health [ 16 , 17 ]. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technology has emerged as a promising alternative NAAT to traditional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) due to several distinct advantages. LAMP is rapid, simple, and cost-effective, requiring minimal laboratory equipment and enabling use in resource-limited settings, making it ideal for point-of-care testing [ 18 - 20 ]. Moreover, LAMP assays often demonstrate higher tolerance to inhibitors commonly found in clinical samples, enhancing their robustness in field applications [ 21 ]. However, LAMP has certain limitations compared to qPCR, including potential difficulties in multiplexing due to complex primer design, reduced quantitative capability, and occasional challenges in distinguishing specific amplification products from nonspecific signals [ 22 , 23 ]. These limitations make careful assay design exceedingly important. For molecular diagnostic assays, performance is highly dependent on the specificity and inclusivity of the primers and probes. Inclusivity ensures that all known genetic variants of a target organism are reliably detected, while specificity ensures that the assay does not cross-react with closely related organisms, other microbes present at the sample collection site, or human genomic DNA. These considerations are particularly critical for LAMP, which uses multiple primers per target and is thus more prone to primer-dimer formation and off-target amplification. The STI NG Plus assay was therefore designed using a rigorous in silico pipeline to ensure comprehensive genome coverage and minimal cross-reactivity, followed by empirical screening to confirm the absence of primer-primer interference and the robustness of each target’s detection chemistry. In this study, we present early sensitivity data from an extraction-free multiplex LAMP-based assay targeting CT, NG, TV, and NG gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, in addition to an in silico analysis of LAMP primers used. The assay’s chemistry and analytical sensitivity are evaluated, demonstrating its suitability as a reliable diagnostic tool that may be used in diverse clinical settings. While this initial testing was carried out using a research instrument, the assay is designed for use in point-of-care settings on a device that can be operated by untrained individuals with minimal instruction. MATERIALS/METHODS In Silico Assay Design and Bioinformatic Screening Candidate LAMP primer sets were designed for each target gene using publicly available genomic sequence data. To assess inclusivity, full-length genome sequences for each pathogen ( C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae , and T. vaginalis ) were retrieved from the NCBI Nucleotide database via the Entrez API. For each target, local pairwise alignments were performed between candidate primers and all retrieved genome records using the Bioconductor Biostrings package in R. Primer sets were retained only if all oligonucleotides aligned to the complete set of known isolates with minimal mismatches (≤1 mismatch per primer), ensuring detection across all known variants. Specificity and cross-reactivity were then evaluated against a panel of 48 organisms commonly found in the urogenital tract ( Table 1 ) , including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. Local alignments were performed to identify potential off-target matches at genomic loci that could support amplification. Primer sets with significant cross-reactivity—defined as alignment of multiple primers within a set to a single non-target genome—were excluded. All primers were also aligned against the human genome (GRCh38.p13) to exclude any potential interaction with host DNA. Primer sets passing both inclusivity and specificity filters were selected for empirical validation. A schematic of the bioinformatic screening pipeline is shown in ( Figure 1 ) . View this table: View inline View popup Table 1. List of organisms included in cross-reactivity panel. This panel includes organisms known to colonize or infect the urogenital tract. Sequence data were retrieved from the NCBI database and used for local alignment-based cross-reactivity in silico screening. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. In silico primer screening workflow for STI NG Plus assay design. The bioinformatics pipeline used for LAMP primer design and validation involved three sequential screening stages: (1) inclusivity assessment to ensure primer binding across all known genome variants of each target pathogen; (2) cross-reactivity assessment against 48 non-target organisms commonly found in the urogenital tract; and (3) host genome screening to eliminate any potential interaction with human genomic DNA. Only primer sets passing all three filters were advanced to laboratory screening as shown in Figure 2 . Empirical Screening of Primer Sets Primer sets that passed in silico screening were synthesized and evaluated in the laboratory ( Figure 2 ). Initial screening was performed in singleplex LAMP reactions using synthetic double-stranded gene fragments corresponding to each target. Reactions were monitored using an intercalating dye to measure time-to-detection (TTD), with a TTD of ≤15 minutes under screening conditions required to proceed. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Workflow for empirical screening of LAMP primer sets. Primer sets that passed in silico inclusivity and specificity filters ( Figure 1 ) were subjected to a multi-stage empirical screening process. First, primers were tested in singleplex reactions using synthetic gene fragments to confirm amplification efficiency and acceptable time-to-detection (TTD ≤15 min). Sets with consistent amplification were then transitioned into multiplex reactions using target-specific fluorescent probes. Multiplexed assays were evaluated for amplification efficiency, primer–primer interference, and background signal. Final primer sets with robust, reproducible performance were incorporated into the STI NG Plus assay chemistry. Primer sets demonstrating efficient single-target amplification were advanced to multiplex screening using target-specific fluorescent probes. Multiplex formulations containing up to 35 oligonucleotides were assessed for amplification efficiency, absence of primer-primer interference, and reproducibility. Sets with robust performance and minimal background were incorporated into the final STI NG Plus chemistry used in this study. Organism Stock Quantification Strains used in this study were obtained from ATCC or BEI and included: Chlamydia trachomatis (ATCC VR-348B) (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 49226) (NG WT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA S91F (BEI 1130991) (NG MUT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (ATCC NYCA04) (TV). Stocks of CT were diluted 500-fold in TE buffer to TCID50 ≥ 10. Stocks of NG WT, NG MT and TV were diluted 1:10 with the lysis buffer and used for digital PCR quantification. Dilutions were aliquoted and stored at -80°C. Aliquoted samples were then diluted in AmplifiDx lysis buffer at 1:1 ratio to lyse the cells and denature the double-stranded bacterial genomic DNA. Lysate was used directly for digital PCR quantification. Digital PCR (dPCR) was performed using the Qiagen QIAcuity Four dPCR system (Qiagen cat no. 911042) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For quantification of DNA, the QIAcuity EG PCR Kit (Qiagen cat no. 250111) was used with 1X master mix, 400 nM each forward and reverse primers, and 20% (v/v) final concentration of template. Each sample was run in duplicate using QIAcuity 8.5k 24-well Nanoplates (Qiagen cat no. 250011). 14 uL of dPCR mix was loaded into each well. Thermocycling was performed with an initial denaturing at 95 ° C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 ° C for 15 sec, 60 ° C for 15 sec, and 72 ° C for 15 sec, with a final cool down at 40 ° C for 5 min. Plate images were obtained in the green channel with a 200 ms exposure and a gain value of 6. Sample Preparation and LOD Determination Quantified stocks samples were prepared by diluting stocks into either clean STI NG Plus lysis buffer (1x TE, IDT cat no. 11-05-01-13) or clinical matrix to generate contrived samples for assay Limit of Detection (LOD) testing ( Figure 3 ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Schematic overview of the STI NG Plus testing workflow for bench testing, lyophilized reaction beads (Lyo Beads) were combined with contrived samples (spiked in clean lysis buffer or clinical matrix) in PCR tubes and loaded onto the QuantStudio 5 instrument for isothermal amplification and optical detection. The LOD of the STI NG Plus assay was first evaluated using a clean buffer. CT and NG WT samples were initially prepared at concentrations corresponding to a FDA-cleared test LOD level: 755 GE/mL for CT and 245 GE/mL for NG. At each dilution level 10 replicates of each target were tested; if 10/10 were detected, targets were diluted 3-fold and testing was repeated until there was <95% detection. For TV and NG MUT microorganism testing, dilutions were initiated at a series of 10-fold, subsequently at 3-fold down from the last most diluted level of detection. At each dilution level, 3 replicates of each target were tested; if 3/3 were detected, targets were diluted 3-fold more and testing was repeated until there was 95% detection. LOD of the STI NG Plus assay was then evaluated with clinical matrix samples spiked with diluted microorganism stocks ( Figure 3 ). Clinical matrix samples consisted of dry vaginal swabs sourced from University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB Certificate of Action for Protocol #20232944). Vaginal swabs were from healthy donors, and had tested negative for all microorganisms included in the study via an existing cleared test. To prepare a clinical matrix, a swab was eluted into a 1x PBS buffer. Microorganism stocks were diluted with the swab eluate at the final targeted LOD level that was previously determined for the target microorganism in a clean buffer. The workflow was designed to be similar to the workflow that will be implemented in the POC device under development ( Figure 6 ). The negative control matrices from clinically negative swabs were used to confirm specificity. Samples were placed in PCR tubes preloaded with STI NG Plus amplification reagents. Samples underwent isothermal amplification and optical detection using a Thermo Fischer QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR instrument. Amplification and detection were performed at 63°C for 20 or 30 min and fluorescence was collected at 1 min intervals. RESULTS In silico analysis confirmed that the STI NG Plus primer sets achieved high inclusivity across all known genome variants of each target organism. Specifically, all C. trachomatis primers aligned perfectly to all 321 GenBank whole genome records. For N. gonorrhoeae , 5 out of 351 genomes exhibited minor nucleotide variability in a subset of primers, but no mismatches were observed in critical regions required for amplification. For T. vaginalis , minor variability was observed in a single primer (LB) across 11 of 287 genomes, with all variation found in draft assemblies where sequencing artifacts could not be ruled out. These results indicate that the selected primers maintain comprehensive coverage of known pathogen diversity. Cross-reactivity screening against 48 organisms commonly found in the urogenital tract, including Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli , and Lactobacillus spp., demonstrated high assay specificity. No primer sets met alignment criteria predictive of off-target amplification. In addition, none of the primers exhibited significant alignment to the human genome (GRCh38), confirming absence of host interference. These findings provide confidence in the assay’s specificity and support the observed clean amplification profiles in both buffer and clinical matrix samples. The STI NG Plus multiplex LAMP assay successfully amplified and detected DNA from all four target organisms— Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae wild type (NG WT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA mutant (NG MUT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)—in both clean lysis buffer and negative clinical matrix. Amplification curves generated using the QuantStudio 5 system demonstrated robust signal strength and consistent amplification kinetics across multiple replicates, supporting reliable detection at low template concentrations. In clean lysis buffer, the assay demonstrated high analytical sensitivity, with limits of detection (LODs) substantially lower than those of the existing FDA-cleared test. Specifically, LODs for CT and NG WT were approximately 31-fold and 7-fold lower, respectively, compared to the FDA-cleared test (755 GE/mL for CT and 245 GE/mL for NG) ( Table 2 ). Amplification was observed in all replicates for all pathogenic samples at low concentrations, confirming the efficiency and sensitivity of the LAMP amplification chemistry ( Figure 4 ). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Analytical sensitivity results for the STI NG Plus Assay run with contrived samples in both lysis buffer and clinical matrix. Limits of detection (LOD) in genome equivalents per milliliter (GE/mL) for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae wild type (NG WT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA S91F (NG MUT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) using the STI NG Plus assay. Results are shown for both clean lysis buffer and clinical matrix. The assay demonstrates lower LODs for CT and NG WT than an FDA-cleared test. Detection was confirmed in ≥95% of replicates at the listed concentrations. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Amplification curves in clean lysis buffer matrix. Representative LAMP amplification curves for each of the four target organisms— Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae wild type (NG WT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA mutant (NG MUT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)—using quantified stocks spiked into clean lysis buffer. Reactions were run on the QuantStudio 5 platform. All targets amplified efficiently at low genome equivalent concentrations, with consistent signal profiles across replicates, demonstrating high analytical sensitivity and reproducibility under ideal reaction conditions. Critically, the assay also demonstrated strong performance in clinical matrix samples derived from swab eluates from healthy patients. Pathogen DNA spiked into this matrix was consistently amplified and detected at low concentrations, validating the assay’s robustness in the presence of compounds found in patient samples ( Figure 5 ). These findings support the feasibility of the assay chemistry using direct patient swab eluates without extraction or extensive sample processing. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. Amplification curves in clinical matrix. Representative LAMP amplification curves for each of the four target organisms— Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae wild type (NG WT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA mutant (NG MUT), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV)—using quantified stocks spiked into negative clinical matrix derived from swab eluates. Despite the presence of complex biological components, all target organisms were reliably detected at low concentrations, confirming the robustness of the assay chemistry with real-world clinical specimens. Overall, the LAMP-based STI NG Plus assay chemistry delivered detection for CT, NG WT, NG MUT, and TV in both lysis buffer and in clinically relevant matrices. The LAMP-based STI NG Plus assay requires no sample preparation, and has a rapid time to amplification, highlighting its suitability for rapid, point-of-care applications. Discussion We have developed a rapid molecular multiplexed assay utilizing LAMP technology, specifically tailored for point-of-care settings. This multiplexed test simultaneously detects CT, NG, TV, and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations in NG (S91F of gyrA ), addressing critical gaps in current diagnostic offerings. Including TV alongside the more commonly tested CT and NG provides significant clinical benefits, as 1) TV infections are often asymptomatic yet associated with serious reproductive health consequences; 2) symptoms may mimic those of CT and NG; and 3) co-infection of TV with other STIs is high in vulnerable populations [ 23 ]. Early and simultaneous detection through multiplexing supports prompt, targeted treatment and clinical management, and reduces the risk of ongoing transmission and long-term complications [ 16 , 24 , 25 ]. The strong analytical performance of the STI NG Plus assay is supported by a rigorous in silico design and screening process. Primer sets were selected based on comprehensive inclusivity analysis across hundreds of whole-genome sequences for each target organism, ensuring detection of known genetic diversity, including variants of clinical and epidemiologic relevance. This is particularly important for pathogens like N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis , where sequence variability can impact diagnostic accuracy. In addition, cross-reactivity screening against a diverse panel of urogenital flora and the human genome minimized the risk of false positives due to off-target amplification. This high level of target discrimination is especially critical in LAMP assays, which use multiple primers per target and are more susceptible to primer–primer interactions and non-specific signals if poorly designed. The combination of bioinformatic and empirical screening steps resulted in a robust multiplexed chemistry with excellent sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility across clinical matrices. The STI NG Plus assay demonstrated high analytical sensitivity, capable of reliably detecting low pathogen loads. Critically, the assay performed robustly in clinically derived sample matrices, confirming its suitability for realistic clinical scenarios. This robust performance underscores the assay’s potential to enhance clinical decision-making accuracy at the point of care [ 13 - 15 ]. Detection of NG gyrA-positive samples highlights another significant benefit of this multiplexed test. Identifying fluoroquinolone resistance markers enables healthcare providers to tailor antibiotic therapy effectively, thus promoting antibiotic stewardship. This targeted approach helps mitigate inappropriate antibiotic use and combat the rising threat of antimicrobial resistance in NG, preserving the efficacy of existing medications [ 10 - 12 ]. To further advance the assay’s clinical applicability, the next steps include transitioning to testing cartridges on the intended POC instrument, DX 100, currently under development ( Figure 6 ), and evaluating assay performance with clinical patient samples against an accepted method. These steps will validate the assay’s practical effectiveness and readiness for clinical deployment. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. Proposed next phase of testing to be run on the DX 100 instrument, currently under development. The DX 100 platform will utilize a similar process as the bench testing ( Figure 3 ) in a closed cartridge system. Briefly a dry swab or liquid sample is mixed with preloaded lysis buffer within the cartridge, reconstituting the lyophilized reagent bead (Lyo Bead) and initiating the amplification reaction within integrated chambers. Both bench and cartridge workflows use the same chemistry and amplification conditions. Technological advancements, such as this multiplexed LAMP assay, have profound implications for patient care by enhancing accessibility, speed, and accuracy of STI diagnostics. Through improvements in point-of-care testing, healthcare systems can more effectively address the escalating rates of STIs, including CT, NG, and TV, thereby improving patient outcomes and public health [ 6 , 7 , 16 ]. Ethics Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. (University of Alabama Birmingham IRB Certificate of Action for Protocol #20232944) Data and materials availability All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Materials, including the STI NG Plus assay chemistry, are available for research use. For inquiries regarding access to materials or data, please contact Chris Meda at chrismeda{at}amplifidx.com . Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R43AI174562. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This project has been funded in part with Federal funds from the NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. 75N92023D00001 as part of the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx ® ) initiative. Funder Information Declared National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, https://ror.org/043z4tv69 , R43AI174562 National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, https://ror.org/012pb6c26 , 75N92023D00001 REFERENCES 1. ↵ Pai NP et al. ( 2015 ). Point-of-care testing for infectious diseases: diversity, complexity, and barriers in low- and middle-income countries . PLoS Med 2. ↵ Gaydos CA . ( 2017 ). Review of use of a new rapid diagnostic test for chlamydia and gonorrhea at the point of care . Sex Transm Dis 3. ↵ Drain PK et al. ( 2014 ). Diagnostic point-of-care tests in resource-limited settings . Lancet Infect Dis 4. Petti CA , et al. ( 2006 ). Laboratory medicine in Africa: a barrier to effective health care . Clin Infect Dis 5. ↵ St John A et al. ( 2010 ). Evidence-based practice for point-of-care testing: balancing the benefits and risks in clinical decision-making . Clin Biochem Rev 6. ↵ Lingervelder D et al. ( 2019 ). Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing: a systematic review . Clin Chem Lab Med 7. ↵ Tucker JD et al. ( 2013 ). Patient perceptions and acceptability of rapid point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections . BMC Health Serv Res 8. ↵ Wi T et al. ( 2017 ). Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Global surveillance and a call for international collaborative action . PLoS Med 9. ↵ Unemo M et al. ( 2019 ). Gonorrhoea . Nat Rev Dis Primers 10. ↵ Allan-Blitz LT et al. ( 2017 ). Implementation of a rapid genotypic assay to promote targeted ciprofloxacin therapy of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection . Clin Infect Dis 11. Tuite AR et al. ( 2017 ). Impact of rapid susceptibility testing and antibiotic stewardship in controlling Neisseria gonorrhoeae . Sex Transm Infect 12. ↵ Seña AC , et al. ( 2020 ) Optimising treatments for sexually transmitted infections: surveillance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, therapeutic strategies, and molecular resistance prediction . Lancet Infect Dis 13. ↵ Zhang and Tanner ( 2022 ). Efficient multiplexing and variant discrimination in reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification with sequence-specific hybridization probes . BioTechniques 14. Zhou Q et al. ( 2022 ) Diagnosis of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis . Indian J Microbiol 15. ↵ Papp et al. ( 2014 ). Recommendations for the Laboratory-Based Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae — 2014 . Recommendations and Reports. CDC Morbity and Mortality Weekly Report, March 14, 2014 . 16. ↵ Peeling RW et al. ( 2006 ). Rapid tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs): the way forward . Sex Transm Infect 17. ↵ Nichols J. ( 2021 ) Utilizing Point-of-Care Testing to Optimize Patient Care . EJIFCC 18. ↵ Notomi T et al. ( 2000 ). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA . Nucleic Acids Res 19. Njiru ZK . ( 2012 ). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification technology: towards point of care diagnostics . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 20. ↵ Yoshioka et al. ( 2023 ). Specific and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for Madurella strains, eumycetoma filamentous fungi causative agent . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 21. ↵ Kaneko et al. ( 2005 ). Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus DNA by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification . J Clin Microbiol 22. ↵ Nagamine K et al. ( 2002 ). Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers . Mol Cell Probes 23. ↵ Zhang Q et al. ( 2025 ) High rates of Treponema pallidum, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, or Trichomonas vaginalis co-infection in people with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24. ↵ Swygard H , Sena AC , Hobbs MM , Cohen MS . ( 2004 ). Trichomoniasis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management . Sex Transm Infect 25. ↵ Kissinger P. ( 2015 ). Trichomonas vaginalis: a review of epidemiologic, clinical and treatment issues . BMC Infect Dis 26. Goldenberg RL et al. ( 2008 ). The Vaginal Microbiota: New Information about Genital Tract Flora Using Molecular-Based Techniques . BJOG View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted July 26, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following A Rapid Multiplex LAMP Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of CT, NG, TV, and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in NG Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share A Rapid Multiplex LAMP Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of CT, NG, TV, and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in NG Shoulian Dong , Manuel X. Duval , Tri D. Do , Jeff Ho , Omar Abdallah , Michael R. White , Jacob C. Johnson , Christine Meda , Nancy Schoenbrunner bioRxiv 2025.07.24.666671; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.24.666671 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools A Rapid Multiplex LAMP Assay for Point-of-Care Detection of CT, NG, TV, and Fluoroquinolone Resistance in NG Shoulian Dong , Manuel X. Duval , Tri D. Do , Jeff Ho , Omar Abdallah , Michael R. White , Jacob C. Johnson , Christine Meda , Nancy Schoenbrunner bioRxiv 2025.07.24.666671; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.24.666671 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Molecular Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7635) Biochemistry (17697) Bioengineering (13894) Bioinformatics (41951) Biophysics (21455) Cancer Biology (18592) Cell Biology (25507) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13380) Ecology (19903) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24321) Genetics (15610) Genomics (22509) Immunology (17737) Microbiology (40398) Molecular Biology (17182) Neuroscience (88618) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2833) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7641) Plant Biology (15158) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4296) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.