Historic residential segregation impacts biodiversity data availability disparately across the tree of life

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Urbanization alters species ranges and nature’s contributions to people, motivating urban conservation. Residential segregation policies have left an indelible impact on urban environments, greenspaces, and wildlife communities, creating socioeconomic heterogeneity and altering biota. However, the extent to which data sufficiently capture urban biodiversity patterns remains unclear, especially when considering historic segregation. We explore how biodiversity metrics (sampling density, estimated completeness of sampling, and expected species richness) vary by Home Owner’s Loan Corporation (HOLC) grade across taxonomic groups, leveraging nearly 60 million amphibia, aves, fungi, insecta, mammalia, plantae, and reptilia observations collected between 2000 and 2020, for 145 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States. After accounting for environmental conditions, we estimate significant differences in sampling density across HOLC grade for all taxonomic groups, with the lowest values found in areas previously redlined. Estimated completeness of biodiversity inventory was low (average ~42% across all taxa) and varied significantly by HOLC grade for birds, mammals, and plants. Expected richness only varied by HOLC grade for birds. Our findings highlight how differences in biodiversity sampling may not translate to differences in expected species richness patterns, and suggest that applying insights obtained from certain taxonomic groups and extrapolating to multiple others may not be appropriate. Urban wildlife communities are not well-documented despite the explosion of digital information, and what is documented is known to be biased along a housing segregation typology for some taxon. These findings add evidence to suggest long-lasting effects of legacies of segregation on the natural world.
Full text 3,098 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Urbanization alters species ranges and nature’s contributions to people, motivating urban conservation. Residential segregation policies have left an indelible impact on urban environments, greenspaces, and wildlife communities, creating socioeconomic heterogeneity and altering biota. However, the extent to which data sufficiently capture urban biodiversity patterns remains unclear, especially when considering historic segregation. We explore how biodiversity metrics (sampling density, estimated completeness of sampling, and expected species richness) vary by Home Owner’s Loan Corporation (HOLC) grade across taxonomic groups, leveraging nearly 60 million amphibia, aves, fungi, insecta, mammalia, plantae, and reptilia observations collected between 2000 and 2020, for 145 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States. After accounting for environmental conditions, we estimate significant differences in sampling density across HOLC grade for all taxonomic groups, with the lowest values found in areas previously redlined. Estimated completeness of biodiversity inventory was low (average ~42% across all taxa) and varied significantly by HOLC grade for birds, mammals, and plants. Expected richness only varied by HOLC grade for birds. Our findings highlight how differences in biodiversity sampling may not translate to differences in expected species richness patterns, and suggest that applying insights obtained from certain taxonomic groups and extrapolating to multiple others may not be appropriate. Urban wildlife communities are not well-documented despite the explosion of digital information, and what is documented is known to be biased along a housing segregation typology for some taxon. These findings add evidence to suggest long-lasting effects of legacies of segregation on the natural world. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2D04V Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Race and Ethnicity, Research Methods in Life Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Urban Studies and Planning residential segregation, biodiversity sampling, environmental justice, Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Home Owners’ Loan Corporation Published: 2024-04-23 08:08 Last Updated: 2024-08-12 14:56 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Underlying raw data, the summarized analysis-ready data, and the R scripts for curating, compiling and conducting the final analyses will be freely available on an openly-accessible government data repository upon publication of this manuscript. This combination gives the broadest range of end users the most flexibility. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0