Comparing clinical characteristic with uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic hysterectomy in symptomatic uterine fibroids – A prospective, single-institution study

Kazuki Anyo, Hyo Kyozuka, Riho Yazawa, Toma Fukuda, Takahiro Omoto, Chihiro Okoshi, Daisuke Suzuki, Tokiya Ishida, Tatsuya Ando, Takuya Ando, Tadanobu Tameta, Tadanobu Tameda, Hiroko Kobayashi, Shun Yasuda, Yasuhisa Nomura, Shu Soeda, Keiya Fujimori
In: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 2025 · vol. 316 , pp. 114806 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114806 · PMID:41223826 · W4415845400
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This prospective study compared the clinical characteristics of uterine artery embolization and laparoscopic hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids, detailing differences between the two treatments.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:12:37.668444+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK