Many analysts and few incentives
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
The Many Analysts Religion Project (MARP) follows in a tradition of many analysts projects that have examined how variations in analytic choices can affect results (Silberzahn & Uhlmann, 2015). One of the core strengths of the many analysts approach is that there are no direct incentives for analysis teams to attempt to achieve statistical significance (Silberzahn et al., 2018). However, in this commentary we suggest that a lack of direct incentives to achieve particular outcomes can be a double-edged sword. We use our own submissions to the MARP project to illustrate our point.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-24T02:00:01.246996+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0